Enregistré dans:
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artículo científico |
| Langue: | en |
| Publié: |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
2014
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=80931523002 |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
Table des matières:
- Is Aristotle’s Response to the Argument for Fatalism in De Interpretatione 9 Successful? M. A. Istvan Jr. Filosofía fatalism Aristotle The goal of this paper is to figure out whether Aristotle’s response to the argu- ment for fatalism in De Interpretatione 9 is a success. By “response” it is meant not simply the reasons Aristotle offers to highlight why fatalism does not accord with how we conduct our lives, but also the solution he devises to block the argument for fatalism. This paper finds that a) Aristotle’s argument for fatalism is essentially bivalence plus that the truth of a proposition implies necessity, b) that Aristotle’s solution is to restrict bivalence, c) that this solution is coherent, and d) that while this solution does not rule out the possibility of fatalism, it does succeed in block- ing the argument for fatalism offered within chapter 9. 2014 artículo científico 0120-0062 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=80931523002 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=809 Ideas y Valores application/pdf Universidad Nacional de Colombia Ideas y Valores (Colombia) Num.155 Vol.LXIII