On the genesis and nature of judicial power
Fuente:
Redalyc
Enregistré dans:
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artículo científico |
| Langue: | en |
| Publié: |
Universidad del Norte
2011
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
| _version_ | 1876459236725096448 |
|---|---|
| author | Murray S. Y. Bessette |
| author_facet | Murray S. Y. Bessette |
| contents | On the genesis and nature of judicial power Murray S. Y. Bessette Filosofía law Locke Hobbes Clarendon judiciary The essential nature of legislative power is to make the laws; that of executive power is to execute those law. The difference between the two is both substantial and significant; it is the difference between the rule of arbitrary power and the rule of law. This paper will seek to trace the genesis of an independent judicial power, in both theory and practice, through an examination of sections of The Constitutions of Clarendon, The Assize of Clarendon, Hobbes´ Leviathan, Locke´s Second Treatise, Montesquieu¿s Spirit of the Laws, as well as The Federalist Papers. Moreover, it will seek to establish its executive nature and to explain why it is so often (at least presently) misunderstood to be akin to the legislative power. 2011 artículo científico 1692-8857 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=85420750010 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=854 Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad del Norte application/pdf Universidad del Norte Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad del Norte (Colombia) Num.15 |
| format | Artículo científico |
| id | redalyc_85420750010 |
| institution | Redalyc |
| language | en |
| publishDate | 2011 |
| publisher | Universidad del Norte |
| spellingShingle | On the genesis and nature of judicial power Murray S. Y. Bessette Filosofía law Locke Hobbes Clarendon judiciary On the genesis and nature of judicial power Murray S. Y. Bessette Filosofía law Locke Hobbes Clarendon judiciary The essential nature of legislative power is to make the laws; that of executive power is to execute those law. The difference between the two is both substantial and significant; it is the difference between the rule of arbitrary power and the rule of law. This paper will seek to trace the genesis of an independent judicial power, in both theory and practice, through an examination of sections of The Constitutions of Clarendon, The Assize of Clarendon, Hobbes´ Leviathan, Locke´s Second Treatise, Montesquieu¿s Spirit of the Laws, as well as The Federalist Papers. Moreover, it will seek to establish its executive nature and to explain why it is so often (at least presently) misunderstood to be akin to the legislative power. 2011 artículo científico 1692-8857 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=85420750010 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=854 Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad del Norte application/pdf Universidad del Norte Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad del Norte (Colombia) Num.15 |
| title | On the genesis and nature of judicial power |
| topic | Filosofía law Locke Hobbes Clarendon judiciary |
| url | https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=85420750010 |