The practicality of pure reason. A normative defence of Kant's theory of moral motivation

Fuente: Redalyc
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Triantafyllos Gkouvas
Format: Artículo científico
Language:en
Published: Universidad del Norte 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1876484898498281472
author Triantafyllos Gkouvas
author_facet Triantafyllos Gkouvas
contents The practicality of pure reason. A normative defence of Kant's theory of moral motivation Triantafyllos Gkouvas Filosofía will autonomy pure reason moral judgment Moral motivation The purpose of this paper is to defend the view that Kant has propounded an internalist theory of moral motivation. In particular, I shall argue that Kant's espousal of internalism is evidenced by his claim that pure reason's relation to the will is premised on a practical synthetic a priori proposition. What I aim to demonstrate is that Kant treated practical syntheticity as a pivotal concept for his account of what it means to be motivated by principles of pure reason. On my construal of Kant's motivational theory, the relation between universalizable maxims and the moral interest to act upon them is necessary but non-tautological, since violations of duty are logically possible despite our having a moral reason to act. What prevents the latter argument from collapsing into a quasiexternalist account of moral motivation is that the motivational impact of law-like maxims is ultimately premised on a normative conception of ourselves as free agents. 2011 artículo científico 1692-8857 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=85422476007 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=854 Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad del Norte application/pdf Universidad del Norte Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad del Norte (Colombia) Num.14
format Artículo científico
id redalyc_85422476007
institution Redalyc
language en
publishDate 2011
publisher Universidad del Norte
spellingShingle The practicality of pure reason. A normative defence of Kant's theory of moral motivation
Triantafyllos Gkouvas
Filosofía
will
autonomy
pure reason
moral judgment
Moral motivation
The practicality of pure reason. A normative defence of Kant's theory of moral motivation Triantafyllos Gkouvas Filosofía will autonomy pure reason moral judgment Moral motivation The purpose of this paper is to defend the view that Kant has propounded an internalist theory of moral motivation. In particular, I shall argue that Kant's espousal of internalism is evidenced by his claim that pure reason's relation to the will is premised on a practical synthetic a priori proposition. What I aim to demonstrate is that Kant treated practical syntheticity as a pivotal concept for his account of what it means to be motivated by principles of pure reason. On my construal of Kant's motivational theory, the relation between universalizable maxims and the moral interest to act upon them is necessary but non-tautological, since violations of duty are logically possible despite our having a moral reason to act. What prevents the latter argument from collapsing into a quasiexternalist account of moral motivation is that the motivational impact of law-like maxims is ultimately premised on a normative conception of ourselves as free agents. 2011 artículo científico 1692-8857 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=85422476007 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=854 Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad del Norte application/pdf Universidad del Norte Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad del Norte (Colombia) Num.14
title The practicality of pure reason. A normative defence of Kant's theory of moral motivation
topic Filosofía
will
autonomy
pure reason
moral judgment
Moral motivation
url https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=85422476007