Análisis bibliométrico a través de indicadores de calidad metodológica de las revistas españolas de educación indizadas en JCR durante el trienio 2014-2016
Fuente:
Redalyc
Enregistré dans:
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artículo científico |
| Langue: | es |
| Publié: |
Universidad de Granada
2019
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
| _version_ | 1876427884025872384 |
|---|---|
| author | Clemente Rodríguez-Sabiote |
| author_facet | Clemente Rodríguez-Sabiote |
| contents | Análisis bibliométrico a través de indicadores de calidad metodológica de las revistas españolas de educación indizadas en JCR durante el trienio 2014-2016 Clemente Rodríguez-Sabiote Álvaro-Manuel Úbeda-Sánchez Educación Journals Bibliometrics Quality control Methods research Evaluation research This study carries out a bibliometric evaluation through methodological quality indicators of the scientific production published during the triennium of 2014 to 2016 in the seven Spanish journals of education indexed in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR): Revista de Psicodidáctica; Comunicar; Revista de Educación; Educación XX1; Enseñanza de las Ciencias, Revista Española de Pedagogía; y Porta Linguarum. Through a bibliometric-descriptive methodology, a sample of articles that totals 479 and selected through a non-probabilistic sampling of deliberate type. Overall, the results obtained indicate that the journals evaluated have achieved levels of compliance with the proposed methodological indicators, which show the excellent methodological quality treasured by these publications, although better in some journals than in others without detriment so that they have also been detected methodological indicators that can be improved. These indicators are related, above all, to the non-explicitation of the typologies of methodological approach, of the sampling used, as well as of the quantitative quality criteria (reliability and validity) and of a qualitative nature. Finally, note that there is empirical evidence to support that the best considered is a journal in JCR in also credited with a better methodological quality. 2019 artículo científico 1134-4032 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=91664442007 https://www.redalyc.org/journal/916/91664442007/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/916/91664442007/html/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/916/91664442007/91664442007.epub https://www.redalyc.org/journal/916/91664442007/movil https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.25.1.12771 es http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=916 RELIEVE. Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa application/pdf Universidad de Granada RELIEVE. Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa (España) Num.1 Vol.25 |
| format | Artículo científico |
| id | redalyc_91664442007 |
| institution | Redalyc |
| language | es |
| publishDate | 2019 |
| publisher | Universidad de Granada |
| spellingShingle | Análisis bibliométrico a través de indicadores de calidad metodológica de las revistas españolas de educación indizadas en JCR durante el trienio 2014-2016 Clemente Rodríguez-Sabiote Educación Journals Bibliometrics Quality control Methods research Evaluation research Análisis bibliométrico a través de indicadores de calidad metodológica de las revistas españolas de educación indizadas en JCR durante el trienio 2014-2016 Clemente Rodríguez-Sabiote Álvaro-Manuel Úbeda-Sánchez Educación Journals Bibliometrics Quality control Methods research Evaluation research This study carries out a bibliometric evaluation through methodological quality indicators of the scientific production published during the triennium of 2014 to 2016 in the seven Spanish journals of education indexed in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR): Revista de Psicodidáctica; Comunicar; Revista de Educación; Educación XX1; Enseñanza de las Ciencias, Revista Española de Pedagogía; y Porta Linguarum. Through a bibliometric-descriptive methodology, a sample of articles that totals 479 and selected through a non-probabilistic sampling of deliberate type. Overall, the results obtained indicate that the journals evaluated have achieved levels of compliance with the proposed methodological indicators, which show the excellent methodological quality treasured by these publications, although better in some journals than in others without detriment so that they have also been detected methodological indicators that can be improved. These indicators are related, above all, to the non-explicitation of the typologies of methodological approach, of the sampling used, as well as of the quantitative quality criteria (reliability and validity) and of a qualitative nature. Finally, note that there is empirical evidence to support that the best considered is a journal in JCR in also credited with a better methodological quality. 2019 artículo científico 1134-4032 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=91664442007 https://www.redalyc.org/journal/916/91664442007/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/916/91664442007/html/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/916/91664442007/91664442007.epub https://www.redalyc.org/journal/916/91664442007/movil https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.25.1.12771 es http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=916 RELIEVE. Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa application/pdf Universidad de Granada RELIEVE. Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa (España) Num.1 Vol.25 |
| title | Análisis bibliométrico a través de indicadores de calidad metodológica de las revistas españolas de educación indizadas en JCR durante el trienio 2014-2016 |
| topic | Educación Journals Bibliometrics Quality control Methods research Evaluation research |
| url | https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=91664442007 https://www.redalyc.org/journal/916/91664442007/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/916/91664442007/html/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/916/91664442007/91664442007.epub https://www.redalyc.org/journal/916/91664442007/movil https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.25.1.12771 |