Deliberative DeLP agents with multiple informants

Fuente: Redalyc
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Luciano H. Tamargo
Format: Artículo científico
Sprache:en
Veröffentlicht: Asociación Española para la Inteligencia Artificial 2012
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1876488178512166912
author Luciano H. Tamargo
author_facet Luciano H. Tamargo
contents Deliberative DeLP agents with multiple informants Luciano H. Tamargo Sebastian Gottifredi Alejandro J. García Marcelo A. Falappa Guillermo R. Simari Ingeniería DeLP Trust Preference Argumentation Abstract In this paper we dene a trust-based argumentative reasoning formalism where the source of the received information is used to decide the warranted conclusions. In the proposed formalism, the agent's tentative conclusions are supported by arguments, and these conclusions can in turn be attacked by other arguments, referred to as counter-arguments. The inference mechanism compares arguments and counter-arguments to decide which conclusion prevails. We propose a novel development of di erent argument comparison criteria based on trust. Thus, given a particular application domain, the more appropriate criterion can be used. Finally, since a realistic scenario should consider that trust on informants is usually subject to change, a complete change theory over the agents' trust is introduced. 2012 artículo científico 1137-3601 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=92525389003 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=925 Inteligencia Artificial. Revista Iberoamericana de Inteligencia Artificial application/pdf Asociación Española para la Inteligencia Artificial Inteligencia Artificial. Revista Iberoamericana de Inteligencia Artificial (España) Num.49 Vol.15
format Artículo científico
id redalyc_92525389003
institution Redalyc
language en
publishDate 2012
publisher Asociación Española para la Inteligencia Artificial
spellingShingle Deliberative DeLP agents with multiple informants
Luciano H. Tamargo
Ingeniería
DeLP
Trust
Preference
Argumentation
Deliberative DeLP agents with multiple informants Luciano H. Tamargo Sebastian Gottifredi Alejandro J. García Marcelo A. Falappa Guillermo R. Simari Ingeniería DeLP Trust Preference Argumentation Abstract In this paper we dene a trust-based argumentative reasoning formalism where the source of the received information is used to decide the warranted conclusions. In the proposed formalism, the agent's tentative conclusions are supported by arguments, and these conclusions can in turn be attacked by other arguments, referred to as counter-arguments. The inference mechanism compares arguments and counter-arguments to decide which conclusion prevails. We propose a novel development of di erent argument comparison criteria based on trust. Thus, given a particular application domain, the more appropriate criterion can be used. Finally, since a realistic scenario should consider that trust on informants is usually subject to change, a complete change theory over the agents' trust is introduced. 2012 artículo científico 1137-3601 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=92525389003 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=925 Inteligencia Artificial. Revista Iberoamericana de Inteligencia Artificial application/pdf Asociación Española para la Inteligencia Artificial Inteligencia Artificial. Revista Iberoamericana de Inteligencia Artificial (España) Num.49 Vol.15
title Deliberative DeLP agents with multiple informants
topic Ingeniería
DeLP
Trust
Preference
Argumentation
url https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=92525389003