Body‐Worn Camera Versus Officer Reports: How Inconsistencies Influence Public Perceptions of Trust, Accuracy, and Punishment

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kris‐Ann S. Anderson, Kristyn Jones, Deryn Strange
Formato: Artículo Open Access
Publicado: Wiley 2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1867006557074489344
author Kris‐Ann S. Anderson
Kristyn Jones
Deryn Strange
author_facet Kris‐Ann S. Anderson
Kristyn Jones
Deryn Strange
Kris‐Ann S. Anderson
Kristyn Jones
Deryn Strange
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Body‐Worn Camera Versus Officer Reports: How Inconsistencies Influence Public Perceptions of Trust, Accuracy, and Punishment Kris‐Ann S. Anderson Kristyn Jones Deryn Strange Applied Cognitive Psychology ABSTRACT Some officers advocate for watching their body‐worn camera (BWC) footage before writing incident reports, fearing inconsistencies may damage their credibility. Across two experiments ( N  = 1580), we examined how inconsistencies influence public perceptions of trust, accuracy, and punishment decisions for an officer involved use‐of‐force incident. In Experiment 1, participants read a brief description and the officer's report but did not see BWC footage; in Experiment 2, participants read the officer's report and watched ambiguous BWC footage. We manipulated whether the report was described as consistent or inconsistent with the footage and whether the officer wrote the report before or after watching the footage. Overall, inconsistency reduced trust and accuracy ratings and, in Experiment 1, increased charging decisions and guilt judgments. Additionally, participants preferred officers watch BWC footage after writing their reports. These results suggest a need for public education about interpreting inconsistencies and that officers have reason to fear inconsistencies. 10.1002/acp.70113 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
doi_str_mv 10.1002/acp.70113
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1002_acp_70113
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
publishDate 2025
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Body‐Worn Camera Versus Officer Reports: How Inconsistencies Influence Public Perceptions of Trust, Accuracy, and Punishment
Kris‐Ann S. Anderson
Kristyn Jones
Deryn Strange
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Body‐Worn Camera Versus Officer Reports: How Inconsistencies Influence Public Perceptions of Trust, Accuracy, and Punishment Kris‐Ann S. Anderson Kristyn Jones Deryn Strange Applied Cognitive Psychology ABSTRACT Some officers advocate for watching their body‐worn camera (BWC) footage before writing incident reports, fearing inconsistencies may damage their credibility. Across two experiments ( N  = 1580), we examined how inconsistencies influence public perceptions of trust, accuracy, and punishment decisions for an officer involved use‐of‐force incident. In Experiment 1, participants read a brief description and the officer's report but did not see BWC footage; in Experiment 2, participants read the officer's report and watched ambiguous BWC footage. We manipulated whether the report was described as consistent or inconsistent with the footage and whether the officer wrote the report before or after watching the footage. Overall, inconsistency reduced trust and accuracy ratings and, in Experiment 1, increased charging decisions and guilt judgments. Additionally, participants preferred officers watch BWC footage after writing their reports. These results suggest a need for public education about interpreting inconsistencies and that officers have reason to fear inconsistencies. 10.1002/acp.70113 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
title Body‐Worn Camera Versus Officer Reports: How Inconsistencies Influence Public Perceptions of Trust, Accuracy, and Punishment
topic Applied Cognitive Psychology
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acp.70113