Screening for Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Symptoms Among Autistic Adults: Measurement Invariance With a Comparison General Sample

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Courtney E. Breiner, Goldie A. McQuaid, Gregory L. Wallace, Hana F. Zickgraf
Format: Artículo Open Access
Publié: Wiley 2025
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1867002626210529281
author Courtney E. Breiner
Goldie A. McQuaid
Gregory L. Wallace
Hana F. Zickgraf
author_facet Courtney E. Breiner
Goldie A. McQuaid
Gregory L. Wallace
Hana F. Zickgraf
Courtney E. Breiner
Goldie A. McQuaid
Gregory L. Wallace
Hana F. Zickgraf
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Screening for Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Symptoms Among Autistic Adults: Measurement Invariance With a Comparison General Sample Courtney E. Breiner Goldie A. McQuaid Gregory L. Wallace Hana F. Zickgraf Autism Research ABSTRACT Research suggests a higher prevalence of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) in autistic people across the lifespan compared to the general population. However, ARFID symptoms in autistic people may be misattributed to core autistic traits and gastrointestinal symptoms that often co‐occur with autism. This diagnostic overshadowing could lead to the under‐recognition and under‐treatment of modifiable symptoms of psychopathology in autistic people. Validating ARFID symptom measures in this population is essential to screening for ARFID and tracking treatment outcomes in this population. Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis was used to evaluate the equivalence of the factor structure, factor loadings, and item intercepts of the Nine‐Item ARFID Screen (NIAS) between a sample of autistic adults ( n  = 248) who self‐disclosed their diagnosis and a comparison general sample ( n  = 398). There was support for strong measurement invariance (configural, metric, and scalar) on the NIAS. Autistic adults scored significantly higher on each of the three subscales: selective eating ( d  = 0.54), appetite impairment ( d  = 0.27), and fear‐driven avoidance of eating ( d  = 0.37). The NIAS is a valid instrument for measuring ARFID symptomatology in autistic adults. Autistic adults experience elevated symptomatology across all three ARFID eating restrictions. Future research should address whether evidence‐based ARFID treatments are efficacious for autistic adults or need to be modified. 10.1002/aur.70039 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
doi_str_mv 10.1002/aur.70039
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1002_aur_70039
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
publishDate 2025
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Screening for Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Symptoms Among Autistic Adults: Measurement Invariance With a Comparison General Sample
Courtney E. Breiner
Goldie A. McQuaid
Gregory L. Wallace
Hana F. Zickgraf
Autism Research
Screening for Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Symptoms Among Autistic Adults: Measurement Invariance With a Comparison General Sample Courtney E. Breiner Goldie A. McQuaid Gregory L. Wallace Hana F. Zickgraf Autism Research ABSTRACT Research suggests a higher prevalence of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) in autistic people across the lifespan compared to the general population. However, ARFID symptoms in autistic people may be misattributed to core autistic traits and gastrointestinal symptoms that often co‐occur with autism. This diagnostic overshadowing could lead to the under‐recognition and under‐treatment of modifiable symptoms of psychopathology in autistic people. Validating ARFID symptom measures in this population is essential to screening for ARFID and tracking treatment outcomes in this population. Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis was used to evaluate the equivalence of the factor structure, factor loadings, and item intercepts of the Nine‐Item ARFID Screen (NIAS) between a sample of autistic adults ( n  = 248) who self‐disclosed their diagnosis and a comparison general sample ( n  = 398). There was support for strong measurement invariance (configural, metric, and scalar) on the NIAS. Autistic adults scored significantly higher on each of the three subscales: selective eating ( d  = 0.54), appetite impairment ( d  = 0.27), and fear‐driven avoidance of eating ( d  = 0.37). The NIAS is a valid instrument for measuring ARFID symptomatology in autistic adults. Autistic adults experience elevated symptomatology across all three ARFID eating restrictions. Future research should address whether evidence‐based ARFID treatments are efficacious for autistic adults or need to be modified. 10.1002/aur.70039 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
title Screening for Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Symptoms Among Autistic Adults: Measurement Invariance With a Comparison General Sample
topic Autism Research
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aur.70039