Testosterone nadir and clinical outcomes in patients with advanced prostate cancer: Post hoc analysis of triptorelin pamoate Phase III studies

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Laurence Klotz, Tri Tat
Format: Artículo Open Access
Veröffentlicht: Wiley 2024
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1867017256432566272
author Laurence Klotz
Tri Tat
author_facet Laurence Klotz
Tri Tat
Laurence Klotz
Tri Tat
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Testosterone nadir and clinical outcomes in patients with advanced prostate cancer: Post hoc analysis of triptorelin pamoate Phase III studies Laurence Klotz Tri Tat BJUI Compass AbstractObjectiveThe objective of the study is to evaluate whether low nadir testosterone during treatment with triptorelin pamoate, a luteinising hormone‐releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist, is associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with advanced prostate cancer using a retrospective analysis of clinical trial data.Patients and methodsData were pooled from three prospective, 9–12‐month Phase III studies of triptorelin monotherapy in patients with advanced prostate cancer (including NCT00751790). The serum testosterone concentration suppression targets evaluated were <0.35 nmol/L (<10 ng/dl), <0.7 nmol/L (<20 ng/dl), <1.7 nmol/L (<50 ng/dl) and ≥1.7 nmol/L. Overall survival (OS) and disease‐specific survival (DSS) by testosterone suppression group were assessed by Kaplan–Meier analysis, with log‐rank test. The time frame for the primary analysis was Days 1–518 (median OS follow‐up 254 days [range, 29–518 days]) and for the sensitivity analyses was Days 1–262. Supplementary analyses combined the ≥0.7‐ to <1.7‐nmol/L and ≥1.7‐nmol/L groups.ResultsThe sample size comprised 592 patients (most received triptorelin monotherapy; four reported concomitant androgen receptor‐axis–targeted therapy). Nadir testosterones of <0.35, ≥0.35 to <0.7, ≥0.7 to <1.7 and ≥1.7 nmol/L were achieved by 96%, 3.2%, 0.34% and 0.17% of patients, respectively. Better OS with decreasing level of nadir testosterone was observed (p < 0.001) and this persisted after sensitivity/supplemental analyses (all p < 0.001). Differences in DSS with decreasing levels of nadir testosterone were not statistically significant in the primary analysis. Sensitivity/supplemental analysis showed better DSS with decreasing level of nadir testosterone (Days 1–262, p = 0.01; combined groups Days 1–518, p = 0.03; combined groups Days 1–262, p = 0.005).ConclusionLow nadir testosterone achieved during treatment with the LHRH agonist triptorelin was associated with improved OS and DSS in patients with advanced prostate cancer. 10.1002/bco2.318 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
doi_str_mv 10.1002/bco2.318
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1002_bco2_318
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
publishDate 2024
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Testosterone nadir and clinical outcomes in patients with advanced prostate cancer: Post hoc analysis of triptorelin pamoate Phase III studies
Laurence Klotz
Tri Tat
BJUI Compass
Testosterone nadir and clinical outcomes in patients with advanced prostate cancer: Post hoc analysis of triptorelin pamoate Phase III studies Laurence Klotz Tri Tat BJUI Compass AbstractObjectiveThe objective of the study is to evaluate whether low nadir testosterone during treatment with triptorelin pamoate, a luteinising hormone‐releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist, is associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with advanced prostate cancer using a retrospective analysis of clinical trial data.Patients and methodsData were pooled from three prospective, 9–12‐month Phase III studies of triptorelin monotherapy in patients with advanced prostate cancer (including NCT00751790). The serum testosterone concentration suppression targets evaluated were <0.35 nmol/L (<10 ng/dl), <0.7 nmol/L (<20 ng/dl), <1.7 nmol/L (<50 ng/dl) and ≥1.7 nmol/L. Overall survival (OS) and disease‐specific survival (DSS) by testosterone suppression group were assessed by Kaplan–Meier analysis, with log‐rank test. The time frame for the primary analysis was Days 1–518 (median OS follow‐up 254 days [range, 29–518 days]) and for the sensitivity analyses was Days 1–262. Supplementary analyses combined the ≥0.7‐ to <1.7‐nmol/L and ≥1.7‐nmol/L groups.ResultsThe sample size comprised 592 patients (most received triptorelin monotherapy; four reported concomitant androgen receptor‐axis–targeted therapy). Nadir testosterones of <0.35, ≥0.35 to <0.7, ≥0.7 to <1.7 and ≥1.7 nmol/L were achieved by 96%, 3.2%, 0.34% and 0.17% of patients, respectively. Better OS with decreasing level of nadir testosterone was observed (p < 0.001) and this persisted after sensitivity/supplemental analyses (all p < 0.001). Differences in DSS with decreasing levels of nadir testosterone were not statistically significant in the primary analysis. Sensitivity/supplemental analysis showed better DSS with decreasing level of nadir testosterone (Days 1–262, p = 0.01; combined groups Days 1–518, p = 0.03; combined groups Days 1–262, p = 0.005).ConclusionLow nadir testosterone achieved during treatment with the LHRH agonist triptorelin was associated with improved OS and DSS in patients with advanced prostate cancer. 10.1002/bco2.318 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
title Testosterone nadir and clinical outcomes in patients with advanced prostate cancer: Post hoc analysis of triptorelin pamoate Phase III studies
topic BJUI Compass
url https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.318