Effect of preoperative alpha‐blockers on ureteroscopy outcomes: A meta‐analysis of randomised trials

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Naeem Bhojani, Ben H. Chew, Samir Bhattacharyya, Amy E. Krambeck, Khurshid R. Ghani, Larry E. Miller
Natura: Artículo Open Access
Pubblicazione: Wiley 2024
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1867011785104556032
author Naeem Bhojani
Ben H. Chew
Samir Bhattacharyya
Amy E. Krambeck
Khurshid R. Ghani
Larry E. Miller
author_facet Naeem Bhojani
Ben H. Chew
Samir Bhattacharyya
Amy E. Krambeck
Khurshid R. Ghani
Larry E. Miller
Naeem Bhojani
Ben H. Chew
Samir Bhattacharyya
Amy E. Krambeck
Khurshid R. Ghani
Larry E. Miller
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Effect of preoperative alpha‐blockers on ureteroscopy outcomes: A meta‐analysis of randomised trials Naeem Bhojani Ben H. Chew Samir Bhattacharyya Amy E. Krambeck Khurshid R. Ghani Larry E. Miller BJUI Compass AbstractObjectivesThis work aims to determine the efficacy and safety of preoperative alpha‐blocker therapy on ureteroscopy (URS) outcomes.MethodsIn this systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomised trials of URS with or without preoperative alpha‐blocker therapy, outcomes included the need for ureteral dilatation, stone access failure, procedure time, residual stone rate, hospital stay, and complications. Residual stone rates were reported with and without adjustments for spontaneous stone passage, medication noncompliance, or adverse events leading to patient withdrawal. Data were analysed using random‐effects meta‐analysis and meta‐regression. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE criteria.ResultsAmong 15 randomised trials with 1653 patients, URS was effective and safe with a stone‐free rate of 81.2% and rare (2.3%) serious complications. The addition of preoperative alpha‐blockers reduced the need for ureteral dilatation (risk ratio [RR] = 0.48; 95% CI = 0.30 to 0.75; p = 0.002), access failure rate (RR = 0.36; 95% CI = 0.23 to 0.57; p < 0.001), procedure time (mean difference [MD] = −6 min; 95% CI = −8 to −3; p < 0.001), risk of residual stone in the primary (RR = 0.44; 95% CI = 0.33 to 0.66; p < 0.001) and adjusted (RR = 0.52; 95% CI = 0.40 to 0.68; p < 0.001) analyses, hospital stay (MD = −0.3 days; 95% CI = −0.4 to −0.1; p < 0.001), and complication rate (RR = 0.46; 95% CI = 0.35 to 0.59; p < 0.001). Alpha‐blockers increased ejaculatory dysfunction risk and were less effective for renal/proximal ureter stones. The certainty of evidence was high or moderate for all outcomes. The main limitation of the review was inconsistency in residual stone assessment methods.ConclusionWhile URS is an effective and safe treatment for stone disease, preoperative alpha‐blocker therapy is well tolerated and can further improve patient outcomes. 10.1002/bco2.358 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
doi_str_mv 10.1002/bco2.358
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1002_bco2_358
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
publishDate 2024
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Effect of preoperative alpha‐blockers on ureteroscopy outcomes: A meta‐analysis of randomised trials
Naeem Bhojani
Ben H. Chew
Samir Bhattacharyya
Amy E. Krambeck
Khurshid R. Ghani
Larry E. Miller
BJUI Compass
Effect of preoperative alpha‐blockers on ureteroscopy outcomes: A meta‐analysis of randomised trials Naeem Bhojani Ben H. Chew Samir Bhattacharyya Amy E. Krambeck Khurshid R. Ghani Larry E. Miller BJUI Compass AbstractObjectivesThis work aims to determine the efficacy and safety of preoperative alpha‐blocker therapy on ureteroscopy (URS) outcomes.MethodsIn this systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomised trials of URS with or without preoperative alpha‐blocker therapy, outcomes included the need for ureteral dilatation, stone access failure, procedure time, residual stone rate, hospital stay, and complications. Residual stone rates were reported with and without adjustments for spontaneous stone passage, medication noncompliance, or adverse events leading to patient withdrawal. Data were analysed using random‐effects meta‐analysis and meta‐regression. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE criteria.ResultsAmong 15 randomised trials with 1653 patients, URS was effective and safe with a stone‐free rate of 81.2% and rare (2.3%) serious complications. The addition of preoperative alpha‐blockers reduced the need for ureteral dilatation (risk ratio [RR] = 0.48; 95% CI = 0.30 to 0.75; p = 0.002), access failure rate (RR = 0.36; 95% CI = 0.23 to 0.57; p < 0.001), procedure time (mean difference [MD] = −6 min; 95% CI = −8 to −3; p < 0.001), risk of residual stone in the primary (RR = 0.44; 95% CI = 0.33 to 0.66; p < 0.001) and adjusted (RR = 0.52; 95% CI = 0.40 to 0.68; p < 0.001) analyses, hospital stay (MD = −0.3 days; 95% CI = −0.4 to −0.1; p < 0.001), and complication rate (RR = 0.46; 95% CI = 0.35 to 0.59; p < 0.001). Alpha‐blockers increased ejaculatory dysfunction risk and were less effective for renal/proximal ureter stones. The certainty of evidence was high or moderate for all outcomes. The main limitation of the review was inconsistency in residual stone assessment methods.ConclusionWhile URS is an effective and safe treatment for stone disease, preoperative alpha‐blocker therapy is well tolerated and can further improve patient outcomes. 10.1002/bco2.358 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
title Effect of preoperative alpha‐blockers on ureteroscopy outcomes: A meta‐analysis of randomised trials
topic BJUI Compass
url https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.358