Extracapsular extension risk assessment using an artificial intelligence prostate cancer mapping algorithm

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alan Priester, Sakina Mohammed Mota, Kyla P. Grunden, Joshua Shubert, Shannon Richardson, Anthony Sisk, Ely R. Felker, James Sayre, Leonard S. Marks, Shyam Natarajan, Wayne G. Brisbane
Formato: Artículo Open Access
Publicado: Wiley 2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1867017541066424320
author Alan Priester
Sakina Mohammed Mota
Kyla P. Grunden
Joshua Shubert
Shannon Richardson
Anthony Sisk
Ely R. Felker
James Sayre
Leonard S. Marks
Shyam Natarajan
Wayne G. Brisbane
author_facet Alan Priester
Sakina Mohammed Mota
Kyla P. Grunden
Joshua Shubert
Shannon Richardson
Anthony Sisk
Ely R. Felker
James Sayre
Leonard S. Marks
Shyam Natarajan
Wayne G. Brisbane
Alan Priester
Sakina Mohammed Mota
Kyla P. Grunden
Joshua Shubert
Shannon Richardson
Anthony Sisk
Ely R. Felker
James Sayre
Leonard S. Marks
Shyam Natarajan
Wayne G. Brisbane
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Extracapsular extension risk assessment using an artificial intelligence prostate cancer mapping algorithm Alan Priester Sakina Mohammed Mota Kyla P. Grunden Joshua Shubert Shannon Richardson Anthony Sisk Ely R. Felker James Sayre Leonard S. Marks Shyam Natarajan Wayne G. Brisbane BJUI Compass AbstractObjectiveThe objective of this study is to compare detection rates of extracapsular extension (ECE) of prostate cancer (PCa) using artificial intelligence (AI)‐generated cancer maps versus MRI and conventional nomograms.Materials and methodsWe retrospectively analysed data from 147 patients who received MRI‐targeted biopsy and subsequent radical prostatectomy between September 2016 and May 2022. AI‐based software cleared by the United States Food and Drug Administration (Unfold AI, Avenda Health) was used to map 3D cancer probability and estimate ECE risk. Conventional ECE predictors including MRI Likert scores, capsular contact length of MRI‐visible lesions, PSMA T stage, Partin tables, and the “PRedicting ExtraCapsular Extension” nomogram were used for comparison.Postsurgical specimens were processed using whole‐mount histopathology sectioning, and a genitourinary pathologist assessed each quadrant for ECE presence. ECE predictors were then evaluated on the patient (Unfold AI versus all comparators) and quadrant level (Unfold AI versus MRI Likert score). Receiver operator characteristic curves were generated and compared using DeLong's test.ResultsUnfold AI had a significantly higher area under the curve (AUC = 0.81) than other predictors for patient‐level ECE prediction. Unfold AI achieved 68% sensitivity, 78% specificity, 71% positive predictive value, and 75% negative predictive value. At the quadrant level, Unfold AI exceeded the AUC of MRI Likert scores for posterior (0.89 versus 0.82, p = 0.003), anterior (0.84 versus 0.80, p = 0.34), and all quadrants (0.89 versus 0.82, p = 0.002). The false negative rate of Unfold AI was lower than MRI in both the anterior (−60%) and posterior prostate (−40%).ConclusionsUnfold AI accurately predicted ECE risk, outperforming conventional methodologies. It notably improved ECE prediction over MRI in posterior quadrants, with the potential to inform nerve‐spare technique and prevent positive margins. By enhancing PCa staging and risk stratification, AI‐based cancer mapping may lead to better oncological and functional outcomes for patients. 10.1002/bco2.421 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
doi_str_mv 10.1002/bco2.421
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1002_bco2_421
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
publishDate 2024
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Extracapsular extension risk assessment using an artificial intelligence prostate cancer mapping algorithm
Alan Priester
Sakina Mohammed Mota
Kyla P. Grunden
Joshua Shubert
Shannon Richardson
Anthony Sisk
Ely R. Felker
James Sayre
Leonard S. Marks
Shyam Natarajan
Wayne G. Brisbane
BJUI Compass
Extracapsular extension risk assessment using an artificial intelligence prostate cancer mapping algorithm Alan Priester Sakina Mohammed Mota Kyla P. Grunden Joshua Shubert Shannon Richardson Anthony Sisk Ely R. Felker James Sayre Leonard S. Marks Shyam Natarajan Wayne G. Brisbane BJUI Compass AbstractObjectiveThe objective of this study is to compare detection rates of extracapsular extension (ECE) of prostate cancer (PCa) using artificial intelligence (AI)‐generated cancer maps versus MRI and conventional nomograms.Materials and methodsWe retrospectively analysed data from 147 patients who received MRI‐targeted biopsy and subsequent radical prostatectomy between September 2016 and May 2022. AI‐based software cleared by the United States Food and Drug Administration (Unfold AI, Avenda Health) was used to map 3D cancer probability and estimate ECE risk. Conventional ECE predictors including MRI Likert scores, capsular contact length of MRI‐visible lesions, PSMA T stage, Partin tables, and the “PRedicting ExtraCapsular Extension” nomogram were used for comparison.Postsurgical specimens were processed using whole‐mount histopathology sectioning, and a genitourinary pathologist assessed each quadrant for ECE presence. ECE predictors were then evaluated on the patient (Unfold AI versus all comparators) and quadrant level (Unfold AI versus MRI Likert score). Receiver operator characteristic curves were generated and compared using DeLong's test.ResultsUnfold AI had a significantly higher area under the curve (AUC = 0.81) than other predictors for patient‐level ECE prediction. Unfold AI achieved 68% sensitivity, 78% specificity, 71% positive predictive value, and 75% negative predictive value. At the quadrant level, Unfold AI exceeded the AUC of MRI Likert scores for posterior (0.89 versus 0.82, p = 0.003), anterior (0.84 versus 0.80, p = 0.34), and all quadrants (0.89 versus 0.82, p = 0.002). The false negative rate of Unfold AI was lower than MRI in both the anterior (−60%) and posterior prostate (−40%).ConclusionsUnfold AI accurately predicted ECE risk, outperforming conventional methodologies. It notably improved ECE prediction over MRI in posterior quadrants, with the potential to inform nerve‐spare technique and prevent positive margins. By enhancing PCa staging and risk stratification, AI‐based cancer mapping may lead to better oncological and functional outcomes for patients. 10.1002/bco2.421 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
title Extracapsular extension risk assessment using an artificial intelligence prostate cancer mapping algorithm
topic BJUI Compass
url https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.421