Multidisciplinary meetings for lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostate hyperplasia

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Emilien Seizilles de Mazancourt, Nadia Abid, Gaele Pagnoux, Olivier Rouvière, Ricardo Codas Duarte, Alain Ruffion, Hakim Fassi Fehri
Format: Artículo Open Access
Veröffentlicht: Wiley 2025
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1867014417808359425
author Emilien Seizilles de Mazancourt
Nadia Abid
Gaele Pagnoux
Olivier Rouvière
Ricardo Codas Duarte
Alain Ruffion
Hakim Fassi Fehri
author_facet Emilien Seizilles de Mazancourt
Nadia Abid
Gaele Pagnoux
Olivier Rouvière
Ricardo Codas Duarte
Alain Ruffion
Hakim Fassi Fehri
Emilien Seizilles de Mazancourt
Nadia Abid
Gaele Pagnoux
Olivier Rouvière
Ricardo Codas Duarte
Alain Ruffion
Hakim Fassi Fehri
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Multidisciplinary meetings for lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostate hyperplasia Emilien Seizilles de Mazancourt Nadia Abid Gaele Pagnoux Olivier Rouvière Ricardo Codas Duarte Alain Ruffion Hakim Fassi Fehri BJUI Compass Abstract Objectives To describe a single academic centre experience in the establishment of Multidisciplinary Meetings (MDM) for the management of male non‐neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) and Benign Prostate Hyperplasia (BPH). Materials and methods Retrospective analysis of all the cases discussed in MDM for LUTS/BPH in our academic centre over a year, and analysis of the implementation rates, reasons for failure of implementation and discrepancies between the proposal and the final decision. Results Over one year, 108 cases were discussed. The implementation rate of the recommendation was 71% (77/108). The reasons for the failure of implementation of the recommendation were patient preference in 6 (5%), lost to follow‐up in 13 (12%), consultant decision in 4 (4%), patient deterioration or new comorbidities in 2 (2%), improvement of LUTS symptoms in 4 (4%) and the suggested technique was not available for technical reasons in 1 (1%). The consultant's proposal was validated in 98 cases (90.7%) and a different decision was made in 9 cases (8.3%). Conclusion The establishment of a MDM for male LUTS/BPH is feasible and could contribute to the improvement of the management of patients. Further studies are needed to evaluate all its aspects. 10.1002/bco2.70089 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
doi_str_mv 10.1002/bco2.70089
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1002_bco2_70089
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
publishDate 2025
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Multidisciplinary meetings for lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostate hyperplasia
Emilien Seizilles de Mazancourt
Nadia Abid
Gaele Pagnoux
Olivier Rouvière
Ricardo Codas Duarte
Alain Ruffion
Hakim Fassi Fehri
BJUI Compass
Multidisciplinary meetings for lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostate hyperplasia Emilien Seizilles de Mazancourt Nadia Abid Gaele Pagnoux Olivier Rouvière Ricardo Codas Duarte Alain Ruffion Hakim Fassi Fehri BJUI Compass Abstract Objectives To describe a single academic centre experience in the establishment of Multidisciplinary Meetings (MDM) for the management of male non‐neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) and Benign Prostate Hyperplasia (BPH). Materials and methods Retrospective analysis of all the cases discussed in MDM for LUTS/BPH in our academic centre over a year, and analysis of the implementation rates, reasons for failure of implementation and discrepancies between the proposal and the final decision. Results Over one year, 108 cases were discussed. The implementation rate of the recommendation was 71% (77/108). The reasons for the failure of implementation of the recommendation were patient preference in 6 (5%), lost to follow‐up in 13 (12%), consultant decision in 4 (4%), patient deterioration or new comorbidities in 2 (2%), improvement of LUTS symptoms in 4 (4%) and the suggested technique was not available for technical reasons in 1 (1%). The consultant's proposal was validated in 98 cases (90.7%) and a different decision was made in 9 cases (8.3%). Conclusion The establishment of a MDM for male LUTS/BPH is feasible and could contribute to the improvement of the management of patients. Further studies are needed to evaluate all its aspects. 10.1002/bco2.70089 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
title Multidisciplinary meetings for lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostate hyperplasia
topic BJUI Compass
url https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.70089