AI‐enhanced micro‐ultrasound improves detection of clinically significant prostate cancer at biopsy
Fuente:
Wiley Open Access
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Muhammad Imran, Wayne G. Brisbane, Li‐Ming Su, Jason P. Joseph, Wei Shao |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artículo Open Access |
| Published: |
Wiley
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
Utility of dynamic contrast enhancement for clinically significant prostate cancer detection
by: Eric V. Li, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Eric V. Li, et al.
Published: (2024)
Micro‐ultrasound tissue echogenicity predicts prostate cancer grade
by: Ailene E. Corona, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Ailene E. Corona, et al.
Published: (2026)
Quantification of perineural invasion on prostate biopsy improves risk stratification in biopsy Grade Group 2–3 cancer
by: Yuki Teramoto, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Yuki Teramoto, et al.
Published: (2026)
Extracapsular extension risk assessment using an artificial intelligence prostate cancer mapping algorithm
by: Alan Priester, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Alan Priester, et al.
Published: (2024)
MRI performance to identify clinically significant prostate cancer following focal cryo‐ablation
by: Herbert Lepor, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Herbert Lepor, et al.
Published: (2025)
Omission of contralateral biopsies in unilateral MRI‐suspicious prostate cancer has minimal impact on clinical risk assessment
by: Stijn M. van den Bosch, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Stijn M. van den Bosch, et al.
Published: (2026)
The carbon footprint of transperineal prostate biopsy
by: Daniel A. Carson, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Daniel A. Carson, et al.
Published: (2025)
Impact of multiparametric MRI and prostate biopsies on anxiety and quality of life in men with suspected prostate cancer
by: Esther H. J. Hamoen, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Esther H. J. Hamoen, et al.
Published: (2025)
Emerging tools for the early detection of prostate cancer
by: Muhammad Haider, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Muhammad Haider, et al.
Published: (2025)
Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis, prostate size and transperineal prostate biopsy
by: Maxwell Louis Sandberg, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Maxwell Louis Sandberg, et al.
Published: (2026)
Clinical validation of a biopsy‐based six‐gene signature prognostic for aggressive prostate cancer
by: Agnieszka Krzyzanowska, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Agnieszka Krzyzanowska, et al.
Published: (2024)
The significant costs of prostate cancer management—An analysis from a Caribbean hospital
by: Geneva Pantoja, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Geneva Pantoja, et al.
Published: (2025)
The impact of pre‐biopsy MRI and additional testing on prostate cancer screening outcomes: A rapid review
by: Abel Tesfai, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Abel Tesfai, et al.
Published: (2024)
Does bladder outflow obstruction obfuscate the traditional clinical factors that are used to assess the risk of prostate cancer at rapid‐access diagnostic clinics?
by: Thomas Philip Cahill, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Thomas Philip Cahill, et al.
Published: (2024)
Cost‐effectiveness analysis of a biopsy‐free diagnostic strategy for prostate cancer using mpMRI and PSMA‐PET/CT
by: Joshua Yi Min Tung, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Joshua Yi Min Tung, et al.
Published: (2026)
Risk factors of negative prostate biopsies: A CHAID decision tree analysis
by: Pierre Allainguillaume, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Pierre Allainguillaume, et al.
Published: (2026)
Perioperative alpha blockers in voiding dysfunction secondary to prostate biopsy: A meta‐analysis
by: Sean Lim, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Sean Lim, et al.
Published: (2024)
Variation in harms and benefits of prostate‐specific antigen screening for prostate cancer by socio‐clinical risk factors: A rapid review
by: Abel Tesfai, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Abel Tesfai, et al.
Published: (2024)
Transperineal prostate biopsy with freehand technique under local anaesthetic: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
by: Benjamin M. Mac Curtain, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Benjamin M. Mac Curtain, et al.
Published: (2025)
Real‐world clinical outcomes of oligometastatic prostate cancer using SBRT: An Australian experience
by: Samantha Shekar, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Samantha Shekar, et al.
Published: (2025)
Effect of prior HoLEP procedure on multiparametric MRI accuracy in detection of prostate cancer
by: Austin Drysch, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Austin Drysch, et al.
Published: (2025)
Genomic prostate score and treatment selection in favourable intermediate‐risk prostate cancer
by: Eric Margolis, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Eric Margolis, et al.
Published: (2025)
Concordance with final pathology when transitioning from standard transrectal to cognitive targeted transperineal prostate biopsy
by: Alfred Honoré, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Alfred Honoré, et al.
Published: (2025)
A pilot study evaluating the safety and efficacy of En‐bloc holmium laser enucleation of the prostate in patients with a history of radiation therapy or high intensity focused ultrasound for management of organ confined prostate cancer with review of the literature
by: Renil S. Titus, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Renil S. Titus, et al.
Published: (2025)
Does total lesion prostate‐specific membrane antigen (PSMA) activity on 68Ga‐PSMA PET/CT correlate with PSA and prostatectomy histopathological/clinical outcomes in patients with localised primary prostate cancer?
by: Jeremy Cheng, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Jeremy Cheng, et al.
Published: (2025)
A sustainable and expedited ‘One‐Stop’ prostate cancer diagnostic pathway to reduce environmental impact and enhance accessibility
by: Lorenzo Storino Ramacciotti, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Lorenzo Storino Ramacciotti, et al.
Published: (2024)
Investigating the prognostic utility of GSTP1 promoter methylation in prostate cancer
by: Ruth Pidsley, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Ruth Pidsley, et al.
Published: (2024)
Incidental crossed fused renal ectopia detected during prostate cancer staging: A photorealistic three‐dimensional rendering
by: Kei Ushijima, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Kei Ushijima, et al.
Published: (2025)
Quality of English‐ and Spanish‐language online content about prostate cancer genetics: Insights into potential contributors to prostate cancer disparities
by: Sophia M. Abusamra, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Sophia M. Abusamra, et al.
Published: (2025)
Testosterone nadir and clinical outcomes in patients with advanced prostate cancer: Post hoc analysis of triptorelin pamoate Phase III studies
by: Laurence Klotz, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Laurence Klotz, et al.
Published: (2024)
Sociodemographic landscape of suspected prostate cancer referrals and diagnoses across North East London
by: Muhammad Haider, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Muhammad Haider, et al.
Published: (2025)
Bibliometric analysis of focal therapy in prostate cancer research
by: Mohammed Shahait, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Mohammed Shahait, et al.
Published: (2024)
Multivariable model integrating PHI and mpMRI for detecting csPCa in biopsy‐naïve men
by: Mario Dominguez Esteban, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Mario Dominguez Esteban, et al.
Published: (2025)
First validation of the Prostatype® P‐score in an Asian cohort: Improving risk stratification for prostate cancer
by: See‐Tong Pang, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: See‐Tong Pang, et al.
Published: (2025)
Reliability of mpMRI in diagnosing cancer prostate following intravesical BCG for bladder cancer
by: Arjun Pon Avudaiappan, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Arjun Pon Avudaiappan, et al.
Published: (2024)
‘It Just Makes Sense to Me’: A qualitative study exploring patient decision‐making and experiences with prostate MRI during active surveillance for prostate cancer
by: Ryan Sutherland, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Ryan Sutherland, et al.
Published: (2024)
National survey of urologists' views on prostate cancer screening in the United Kingdom
by: Nikhil Mayor, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Nikhil Mayor, et al.
Published: (2026)
Focal therapy in prostate cancer: Development, application and outcomes in the United Kingdom
by: Nadia Rokan, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Nadia Rokan, et al.
Published: (2025)
Incorporating the NICE Cambridge Prognostic Groups and Predict Prostate into a structured informed‐decision making clinic reduces over‐treatment rates of early prostate cancer
by: Vincent J. Gnanapragasam, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Vincent J. Gnanapragasam, et al.
Published: (2025)
The impact of biopsy core length on the discrepancy in Gleason scores between biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen
by: Cheng‐hao Guo, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Cheng‐hao Guo, et al.
Published: (2025)
Similar Items
-
Utility of dynamic contrast enhancement for clinically significant prostate cancer detection
by: Eric V. Li, et al.
Published: (2024) -
Micro‐ultrasound tissue echogenicity predicts prostate cancer grade
by: Ailene E. Corona, et al.
Published: (2026) -
Quantification of perineural invasion on prostate biopsy improves risk stratification in biopsy Grade Group 2–3 cancer
by: Yuki Teramoto, et al.
Published: (2026) -
Extracapsular extension risk assessment using an artificial intelligence prostate cancer mapping algorithm
by: Alan Priester, et al.
Published: (2024) -
MRI performance to identify clinically significant prostate cancer following focal cryo‐ablation
by: Herbert Lepor, et al.
Published: (2025)