Cost‐effectiveness analysis of a biopsy‐free diagnostic strategy for prostate cancer using mpMRI and PSMA‐PET/CT

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Joshua Yi Min Tung, Rachel Shu‐En Lau, Edmund Pek Siang Teo, Kit Mun Chow, Julene Hui Wun Ong, Timothy Siliang Lu, Weiren Chen, Jingqiu Li, Xinyan Yang, Alvin Yuanming Lee, Yu Guang Tan, Kae Jack Tay, Sue Ping Thang, Winnie Wing Chuen Lam, Yan Mee Law, Henry Sun Sien Ho, Christopher Wai Sam Cheng, John Shyi‐Peng Yuen, Kenneth Chen
Format: Artículo Open Access
Publié: Wiley 2026
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1867012439955996672
author Joshua Yi Min Tung
Rachel Shu‐En Lau
Edmund Pek Siang Teo
Kit Mun Chow
Julene Hui Wun Ong
Timothy Siliang Lu
Weiren Chen
Jingqiu Li
Xinyan Yang
Alvin Yuanming Lee
Yu Guang Tan
Kae Jack Tay
Sue Ping Thang
Winnie Wing Chuen Lam
Yan Mee Law
Henry Sun Sien Ho
Christopher Wai Sam Cheng
John Shyi‐Peng Yuen
Kenneth Chen
author_facet Joshua Yi Min Tung
Rachel Shu‐En Lau
Edmund Pek Siang Teo
Kit Mun Chow
Julene Hui Wun Ong
Timothy Siliang Lu
Weiren Chen
Jingqiu Li
Xinyan Yang
Alvin Yuanming Lee
Yu Guang Tan
Kae Jack Tay
Sue Ping Thang
Winnie Wing Chuen Lam
Yan Mee Law
Henry Sun Sien Ho
Christopher Wai Sam Cheng
John Shyi‐Peng Yuen
Kenneth Chen
Joshua Yi Min Tung
Rachel Shu‐En Lau
Edmund Pek Siang Teo
Kit Mun Chow
Julene Hui Wun Ong
Timothy Siliang Lu
Weiren Chen
Jingqiu Li
Xinyan Yang
Alvin Yuanming Lee
Yu Guang Tan
Kae Jack Tay
Sue Ping Thang
Winnie Wing Chuen Lam
Yan Mee Law
Henry Sun Sien Ho
Christopher Wai Sam Cheng
John Shyi‐Peng Yuen
Kenneth Chen
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Cost‐effectiveness analysis of a biopsy‐free diagnostic strategy for prostate cancer using mpMRI and PSMA‐PET/CT Joshua Yi Min Tung Rachel Shu‐En Lau Edmund Pek Siang Teo Kit Mun Chow Julene Hui Wun Ong Timothy Siliang Lu Weiren Chen Jingqiu Li Xinyan Yang Alvin Yuanming Lee Yu Guang Tan Kae Jack Tay Sue Ping Thang Winnie Wing Chuen Lam Yan Mee Law Henry Sun Sien Ho Christopher Wai Sam Cheng John Shyi‐Peng Yuen Kenneth Chen BJUI Compass Abstract Introduction Prostate‐Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography (PSMA PET/CT) has shown a higher diagnostic accuracy in prostate cancer imaging when compared to conventional modalities, with improved sensitivity and specificity rates when combined with multiparametric prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI). We evaluated the cost‐effectiveness of a combined PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI biopsy‐free diagnostic approach for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Method A decision tree model was designed to compare two diagnostic strategies for csPCa in men with raised Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA)—the first with conventional mpMRI followed by transperineal prostate biopsy versus a second biopsy‐free, PSMA PET/CT plus mpMRI combined imaging strategy. We evaluated the impact of each strategy on costs and Quality‐Adjusted‐Life‐Years (QALYs). Willingness‐to‐pay thresholds were set at 1× and 3× Gross Domestic Product (GDP). One‐way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Results A combined mpMRI and PSMA PET/CT diagnostic strategy was 0.04 QALY more effective but SGD$4088.03 more expensive than the conventional mpMRI and biopsy strategy. The incremental cost‐effective ratio (ICER) was SGD$92782.87 per quality‐adjusted life year (QALY). In the combined imaging strategy, 3.5% of the cohort had a missed diagnosis of prostate cancer versus 13.9% in the conventional mpMRI and biopsy strategy. Probabilistic analyses showed that the combined imaging strategy was cost‐effective at willingness‐to‐pay thresholds of SGD$121160 and SGD$363480, respectively. Conclusion Combined mpMRI and PSMA PET/CT for csPCa diagnosis are a cost‐effective strategy in terms of health utility over the conventional approach for diagnosing csPCa in men with raised PSA, potentially reducing the need for invasive diagnostic procedures. 10.1002/bco2.70172 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
doi_str_mv 10.1002/bco2.70172
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1002_bco2_70172
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
publishDate 2026
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Cost‐effectiveness analysis of a biopsy‐free diagnostic strategy for prostate cancer using mpMRI and PSMA‐PET/CT
Joshua Yi Min Tung
Rachel Shu‐En Lau
Edmund Pek Siang Teo
Kit Mun Chow
Julene Hui Wun Ong
Timothy Siliang Lu
Weiren Chen
Jingqiu Li
Xinyan Yang
Alvin Yuanming Lee
Yu Guang Tan
Kae Jack Tay
Sue Ping Thang
Winnie Wing Chuen Lam
Yan Mee Law
Henry Sun Sien Ho
Christopher Wai Sam Cheng
John Shyi‐Peng Yuen
Kenneth Chen
BJUI Compass
Cost‐effectiveness analysis of a biopsy‐free diagnostic strategy for prostate cancer using mpMRI and PSMA‐PET/CT Joshua Yi Min Tung Rachel Shu‐En Lau Edmund Pek Siang Teo Kit Mun Chow Julene Hui Wun Ong Timothy Siliang Lu Weiren Chen Jingqiu Li Xinyan Yang Alvin Yuanming Lee Yu Guang Tan Kae Jack Tay Sue Ping Thang Winnie Wing Chuen Lam Yan Mee Law Henry Sun Sien Ho Christopher Wai Sam Cheng John Shyi‐Peng Yuen Kenneth Chen BJUI Compass Abstract Introduction Prostate‐Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography (PSMA PET/CT) has shown a higher diagnostic accuracy in prostate cancer imaging when compared to conventional modalities, with improved sensitivity and specificity rates when combined with multiparametric prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI). We evaluated the cost‐effectiveness of a combined PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI biopsy‐free diagnostic approach for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Method A decision tree model was designed to compare two diagnostic strategies for csPCa in men with raised Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA)—the first with conventional mpMRI followed by transperineal prostate biopsy versus a second biopsy‐free, PSMA PET/CT plus mpMRI combined imaging strategy. We evaluated the impact of each strategy on costs and Quality‐Adjusted‐Life‐Years (QALYs). Willingness‐to‐pay thresholds were set at 1× and 3× Gross Domestic Product (GDP). One‐way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Results A combined mpMRI and PSMA PET/CT diagnostic strategy was 0.04 QALY more effective but SGD$4088.03 more expensive than the conventional mpMRI and biopsy strategy. The incremental cost‐effective ratio (ICER) was SGD$92782.87 per quality‐adjusted life year (QALY). In the combined imaging strategy, 3.5% of the cohort had a missed diagnosis of prostate cancer versus 13.9% in the conventional mpMRI and biopsy strategy. Probabilistic analyses showed that the combined imaging strategy was cost‐effective at willingness‐to‐pay thresholds of SGD$121160 and SGD$363480, respectively. Conclusion Combined mpMRI and PSMA PET/CT for csPCa diagnosis are a cost‐effective strategy in terms of health utility over the conventional approach for diagnosing csPCa in men with raised PSA, potentially reducing the need for invasive diagnostic procedures. 10.1002/bco2.70172 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
title Cost‐effectiveness analysis of a biopsy‐free diagnostic strategy for prostate cancer using mpMRI and PSMA‐PET/CT
topic BJUI Compass
url https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.70172