Looking for Biomarkers Which May Explain Idiopathic Environmental Intolerance Attributed to Electromagnetic Fields (IEI‐EMF): Does RF‐EMF Exposure Influence Salivary Cortisol Response?

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Adam Verrender, Jacob Manley, Nikkeah K. Wallace, Sarah P. Loughran, Rodney J. Croft
Format: Artículo Open Access
Published: Wiley 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867021596371189760
author Adam Verrender
Jacob Manley
Nikkeah K. Wallace
Sarah P. Loughran
Rodney J. Croft
author_facet Adam Verrender
Jacob Manley
Nikkeah K. Wallace
Sarah P. Loughran
Rodney J. Croft
Adam Verrender
Jacob Manley
Nikkeah K. Wallace
Sarah P. Loughran
Rodney J. Croft
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Looking for Biomarkers Which May Explain Idiopathic Environmental Intolerance Attributed to Electromagnetic Fields (IEI‐EMF): Does RF‐EMF Exposure Influence Salivary Cortisol Response? Adam Verrender Jacob Manley Nikkeah K. Wallace Sarah P. Loughran Rodney J. Croft Bioelectromagnetics ABSTRACT In order to understand Idiopathic Environmental Intolerance attributed to Electromagnetic Fields (IEI‐EMF), it has been argued that it is crucial to test for effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF‐EMF) on biomarkers, given that they can be more objective than symptom reports. While no clear evidence links RF‐EMF exposure to biomarker changes, research remains limited and largely speculative due to the lack of known bioeffect mechanisms. However, there is in vitro evidence that cortisol is affected by heating, which, as RF‐EMF causes heating, raises the possibility that RF‐EMF exposure may increase cortisol via thermally mediated processes. If cortisol is affected by RF‐EMF exposure, it may form part of a broader aetiology of IEI‐EMF, where RF‐EMF‐induced physiological (cortisol) inputs first generate somatic sensations, which are then fostered by expectancy or learning‐based processes to generate symptoms. However, studies investigating whether RF‐EMF exposure influences cortisol have reported inconsistent, but mostly null results, and many suffer from methodological issues. The current study was designed with several methodological improvements to determine whether RF‐EMF affects cortisol. Seventy‐two participants completed a randomized, double‐blind, counterbalanced provocation study where they were exposed to both active (2 W/kg peak SAR 10g in head) and sham RF‐EMF (0 W/kg peak SAR 10g in head). Despite implementing several methodological improvements, the current study failed to find an effect of RF‐EMF exposure on salivary cortisol concentration. This study provides a valuable direction for future research and stresses the importance of establishing and testing theoretically plausible interactions between low‐level RF‐EMF exposure, the human body, and IEI‐EMF symptoms. 10.1002/bem.70021 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
doi_str_mv 10.1002/bem.70021
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1002_bem_70021
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
publishDate 2025
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Looking for Biomarkers Which May Explain Idiopathic Environmental Intolerance Attributed to Electromagnetic Fields (IEI‐EMF): Does RF‐EMF Exposure Influence Salivary Cortisol Response?
Adam Verrender
Jacob Manley
Nikkeah K. Wallace
Sarah P. Loughran
Rodney J. Croft
Bioelectromagnetics
Looking for Biomarkers Which May Explain Idiopathic Environmental Intolerance Attributed to Electromagnetic Fields (IEI‐EMF): Does RF‐EMF Exposure Influence Salivary Cortisol Response? Adam Verrender Jacob Manley Nikkeah K. Wallace Sarah P. Loughran Rodney J. Croft Bioelectromagnetics ABSTRACT In order to understand Idiopathic Environmental Intolerance attributed to Electromagnetic Fields (IEI‐EMF), it has been argued that it is crucial to test for effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF‐EMF) on biomarkers, given that they can be more objective than symptom reports. While no clear evidence links RF‐EMF exposure to biomarker changes, research remains limited and largely speculative due to the lack of known bioeffect mechanisms. However, there is in vitro evidence that cortisol is affected by heating, which, as RF‐EMF causes heating, raises the possibility that RF‐EMF exposure may increase cortisol via thermally mediated processes. If cortisol is affected by RF‐EMF exposure, it may form part of a broader aetiology of IEI‐EMF, where RF‐EMF‐induced physiological (cortisol) inputs first generate somatic sensations, which are then fostered by expectancy or learning‐based processes to generate symptoms. However, studies investigating whether RF‐EMF exposure influences cortisol have reported inconsistent, but mostly null results, and many suffer from methodological issues. The current study was designed with several methodological improvements to determine whether RF‐EMF affects cortisol. Seventy‐two participants completed a randomized, double‐blind, counterbalanced provocation study where they were exposed to both active (2 W/kg peak SAR 10g in head) and sham RF‐EMF (0 W/kg peak SAR 10g in head). Despite implementing several methodological improvements, the current study failed to find an effect of RF‐EMF exposure on salivary cortisol concentration. This study provides a valuable direction for future research and stresses the importance of establishing and testing theoretically plausible interactions between low‐level RF‐EMF exposure, the human body, and IEI‐EMF symptoms. 10.1002/bem.70021 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
title Looking for Biomarkers Which May Explain Idiopathic Environmental Intolerance Attributed to Electromagnetic Fields (IEI‐EMF): Does RF‐EMF Exposure Influence Salivary Cortisol Response?
topic Bioelectromagnetics
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bem.70021