Endovascular Treatment of Malfunctioning Dialysis Fistulas: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis Comparing Transradial and Conventional Transvenous Access

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roberto Minici, Massimo Venturini, Federico Fontana, Giuseppe Guzzardi, Federico Torre, Marco Spinetta, Andrea Coppola, Filippo Piacentino, Pasquale Guerriero, Nicola De Rosi, Biagio Apollonio, Marco Franchin, Francesco Giurazza, Luca Brunese, Domenico Laganà
Formato: Artículo Open Access
Publicado: Wiley 2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1867021861736415232
author Roberto Minici
Massimo Venturini
Federico Fontana
Giuseppe Guzzardi
Federico Torre
Marco Spinetta
Andrea Coppola
Filippo Piacentino
Pasquale Guerriero
Nicola De Rosi
Biagio Apollonio
Marco Franchin
Francesco Giurazza
Luca Brunese
Domenico Laganà
author_facet Roberto Minici
Massimo Venturini
Federico Fontana
Giuseppe Guzzardi
Federico Torre
Marco Spinetta
Andrea Coppola
Filippo Piacentino
Pasquale Guerriero
Nicola De Rosi
Biagio Apollonio
Marco Franchin
Francesco Giurazza
Luca Brunese
Domenico Laganà
Roberto Minici
Massimo Venturini
Federico Fontana
Giuseppe Guzzardi
Federico Torre
Marco Spinetta
Andrea Coppola
Filippo Piacentino
Pasquale Guerriero
Nicola De Rosi
Biagio Apollonio
Marco Franchin
Francesco Giurazza
Luca Brunese
Domenico Laganà
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Endovascular Treatment of Malfunctioning Dialysis Fistulas: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis Comparing Transradial and Conventional Transvenous Access Roberto Minici Massimo Venturini Federico Fontana Giuseppe Guzzardi Federico Torre Marco Spinetta Andrea Coppola Filippo Piacentino Pasquale Guerriero Nicola De Rosi Biagio Apollonio Marco Franchin Francesco Giurazza Luca Brunese Domenico Laganà Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions ABSTRACT Background Venous outflow is the favored access for endovascular management of dialysis fistulas. However, transradial access (TRA) offers advantages in specific clinical scenarios. The study aims to compare the efficacy, feasibility, and safety of TRA and transvenous access (TVA) in the endovascular management of malfunctioning dialysis fistulas, addressing the existing gap in comprehensive literature. Methods A retrospective multi‐center analysis included prospectively collected data (January 2021–November 2023) from patients undergoing endovascular management of malfunctioning dialysis fistulas with TRA. Control groups comprised patients with TVA. Results Of 206 patients, 62 underwent TRA, and 144 underwent TVA. Baseline demographics showed a well‐matched distribution. TRA exhibited longer cannulation times but similar procedural and fluoroscopy times. Technical success rates were high for both TRA (98.4%) and TVA (97.2%). Clinical success rates were comparable (96.8% vs. 95.8%). Postprocedure access flow rates and complications demonstrated no significant differences. Conclusions This study provides the first direct comparison of TRA and TVA in malfunctioning dialytic fistulas. While venous outflow remains the standard vascular access site for managing malfunctioning dialysis fistulas, TRA shows comparable efficacy, safety, and feasibility, making it a viable alternative in specific clinical contexts. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and to determine the long‐term durability of TRA. 10.1002/ccd.31349 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ccd.31349
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1002_ccd_31349
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
publishDate 2024
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Endovascular Treatment of Malfunctioning Dialysis Fistulas: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis Comparing Transradial and Conventional Transvenous Access
Roberto Minici
Massimo Venturini
Federico Fontana
Giuseppe Guzzardi
Federico Torre
Marco Spinetta
Andrea Coppola
Filippo Piacentino
Pasquale Guerriero
Nicola De Rosi
Biagio Apollonio
Marco Franchin
Francesco Giurazza
Luca Brunese
Domenico Laganà
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Endovascular Treatment of Malfunctioning Dialysis Fistulas: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis Comparing Transradial and Conventional Transvenous Access Roberto Minici Massimo Venturini Federico Fontana Giuseppe Guzzardi Federico Torre Marco Spinetta Andrea Coppola Filippo Piacentino Pasquale Guerriero Nicola De Rosi Biagio Apollonio Marco Franchin Francesco Giurazza Luca Brunese Domenico Laganà Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions ABSTRACT Background Venous outflow is the favored access for endovascular management of dialysis fistulas. However, transradial access (TRA) offers advantages in specific clinical scenarios. The study aims to compare the efficacy, feasibility, and safety of TRA and transvenous access (TVA) in the endovascular management of malfunctioning dialysis fistulas, addressing the existing gap in comprehensive literature. Methods A retrospective multi‐center analysis included prospectively collected data (January 2021–November 2023) from patients undergoing endovascular management of malfunctioning dialysis fistulas with TRA. Control groups comprised patients with TVA. Results Of 206 patients, 62 underwent TRA, and 144 underwent TVA. Baseline demographics showed a well‐matched distribution. TRA exhibited longer cannulation times but similar procedural and fluoroscopy times. Technical success rates were high for both TRA (98.4%) and TVA (97.2%). Clinical success rates were comparable (96.8% vs. 95.8%). Postprocedure access flow rates and complications demonstrated no significant differences. Conclusions This study provides the first direct comparison of TRA and TVA in malfunctioning dialytic fistulas. While venous outflow remains the standard vascular access site for managing malfunctioning dialysis fistulas, TRA shows comparable efficacy, safety, and feasibility, making it a viable alternative in specific clinical contexts. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and to determine the long‐term durability of TRA. 10.1002/ccd.31349 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
title Endovascular Treatment of Malfunctioning Dialysis Fistulas: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis Comparing Transradial and Conventional Transvenous Access
topic Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ccd.31349