Personalizing Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock: A Review and Comparison of Current Devices

Documenti analoghi

• Intravascular Imaging‐Guided Versus Angiography‐Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the United States
  di: Chayakrit Krittanawong, et al.
  Pubblicazione: (2024)
• Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Nonagenarians in the United States
  di: Arhum Mahmood, et al.
  Pubblicazione: (2025)
• A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Combined Mechanical Circulatory Support in Acute Myocardial Infarction Related Cardiogenic Shock
  di: Bing Wei Thaddeus Soh, et al.
  Pubblicazione: (2024)
• Comment on “Impact of Lactate Levels on Admission in STEMI Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Treated With IMPELLA”
  di: Mian Zain Hayat, et al.
  Pubblicazione: (2025)
• Large‐Bore Thrombectomy Versus Catheter‐Directed Thrombolysis for Acute Intermediate & High‐Risk Pulmonary Embolism: A Meta‐Analysis of Up‐to‐Date Evidence
  di: Farhan Naeem, et al.
  Pubblicazione: (2025)