Comparative Study of Single‐ Versus Double‐ProGlide Device Strategy for Access Site Closure of Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Documenti analoghi

• Dual ProGlide Versus ProGlide and Angio‐Seal for Femoral Access Hemostasias in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Meta‐Analysis of Up‐to‐Date Evidence
  di: Farhan Naeem, et al.
  Pubblicazione: (2025)
• Impact of Aortic Atherosclerosis on Clinical Outcomes After Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
  di: Yoshinori Shirai, et al.
  Pubblicazione: (2025)
• Propensity Matched Analysis of 14 French Suture‐ Versus Plug‐Based Vascular Closure During Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR)
  di: Tobias Lerchner, et al.
  Pubblicazione: (2025)
• ProGlide‐AngioSeal versus ProGlide‐FemoSeal for vascular access hemostasis posttranscatheter aortic valve implantation
  di: Mohamed Samy, et al.
  Pubblicazione: (2024)
• Anatomical Predictors of Access‐Related Vascular Complications Following Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
  di: Gökhan Demirci, et al.
  Pubblicazione: (2025)