Comparison of Three TR Band Deflation Protocols Following Radial Coronary Procedures: A Prospective Randomized Trial

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Ebtisam A. Elhihi, Rudaynah H. Alromaili, Sadakhathulla Valiyapeediakkal, Rahaf H. Alsharif, Lubina M. Ashraf, Abdul Rasheed V. Abdul Rassak, Marwin R. Patarasa, Roaa S. Fouta, Muhammed R. Elamkulavan, Razan W. Alsulaimani, Asma S. Alrizqi, Mifas Meleraroth, Amani Bakr Albandar, Amani B. Tukruni
Format: Artículo Open Access
Veröffentlicht: Wiley 2026
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1867010343069286400
author Ebtisam A. Elhihi
Rudaynah H. Alromaili
Sadakhathulla Valiyapeediakkal
Rahaf H. Alsharif
Lubina M. Ashraf
Abdul Rasheed V. Abdul Rassak
Marwin R. Patarasa
Roaa S. Fouta
Muhammed R. Elamkulavan
Razan W. Alsulaimani
Asma S. Alrizqi
Mifas Meleraroth
Amani Bakr Albandar
Amani B. Tukruni
author_facet Ebtisam A. Elhihi
Rudaynah H. Alromaili
Sadakhathulla Valiyapeediakkal
Rahaf H. Alsharif
Lubina M. Ashraf
Abdul Rasheed V. Abdul Rassak
Marwin R. Patarasa
Roaa S. Fouta
Muhammed R. Elamkulavan
Razan W. Alsulaimani
Asma S. Alrizqi
Mifas Meleraroth
Amani Bakr Albandar
Amani B. Tukruni
Ebtisam A. Elhihi
Rudaynah H. Alromaili
Sadakhathulla Valiyapeediakkal
Rahaf H. Alsharif
Lubina M. Ashraf
Abdul Rasheed V. Abdul Rassak
Marwin R. Patarasa
Roaa S. Fouta
Muhammed R. Elamkulavan
Razan W. Alsulaimani
Asma S. Alrizqi
Mifas Meleraroth
Amani Bakr Albandar
Amani B. Tukruni
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Comparison of Three TR Band Deflation Protocols Following Radial Coronary Procedures: A Prospective Randomized Trial Ebtisam A. Elhihi Rudaynah H. Alromaili Sadakhathulla Valiyapeediakkal Rahaf H. Alsharif Lubina M. Ashraf Abdul Rasheed V. Abdul Rassak Marwin R. Patarasa Roaa S. Fouta Muhammed R. Elamkulavan Razan W. Alsulaimani Asma S. Alrizqi Mifas Meleraroth Amani Bakr Albandar Amani B. Tukruni Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions ABSTRACT Background Radial artery hemostasis can be achieved through a variety of methods after the excision of the sheath. The risk of radial artery blockage presents a challenge linked to the radial approach, potentially limiting its future application. The patent hemostasis method effectively achieves hemostasis while maintaining the patency of the radial artery, thereby reducing the likelihood of radial artery occlusion. Aims The aim of this study was to compare three TR band deflation protocols (early initiation with long intervals, delayed initiation with short intervals, and routine protocol) to determine the optimum approach for TR band deflation following radial coronary procedures. Methods A randomized controlled trial was performed at King Abdullah Medical City, including 207 cardiac patients undergoing trans‐radial coronary procedures. The TR band was utilized with the patented hemostasis technique, wherein 2 mL of air was injected following the detection of the radial pulse on pulse oximetry after complete occlusion with 16 mL of air. Patients were randomized using electronic randomization in a 1:1:1 ratio into three groups. Total time for TR band removal, bleeding complications, and radial artery occlusions' occurrence were measured through one tool developed by the researcher. This study was conducted in accordance with the CONSORT guidelines. Results A total of 207 patients were recruited. Protocols A, B, and C had significantly different mean percentages of total TR band removal time (194.1 ± 38.15, 200.1 ± 27.2, and 152.9 ± 59.4, p  = 0.000). The three groups had similar bleeding rates (11.8%, 15.9%, and 22.9%; p  = 0.2). The study indicated that 10.3% of patients in protocol A, 7.2% in protocol B, and 22.9% in protocol C reported bleeding during the first hour from starting the protocol, with a significant difference ( p  = 0.01). In the second hour, 1.4% of protocol B patients had small hematomas (< 5 cm). No incidence of radial artery occlusion was observed in any group. Conclusion The early protocol appears to be the most effective in reducing the incidence of bleeding complications, while the routine protocol offers a faster approach but is associated with earlier bleeding complications. 10.1002/ccd.70517 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ccd.70517
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1002_ccd_70517
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
publishDate 2026
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Comparison of Three TR Band Deflation Protocols Following Radial Coronary Procedures: A Prospective Randomized Trial
Ebtisam A. Elhihi
Rudaynah H. Alromaili
Sadakhathulla Valiyapeediakkal
Rahaf H. Alsharif
Lubina M. Ashraf
Abdul Rasheed V. Abdul Rassak
Marwin R. Patarasa
Roaa S. Fouta
Muhammed R. Elamkulavan
Razan W. Alsulaimani
Asma S. Alrizqi
Mifas Meleraroth
Amani Bakr Albandar
Amani B. Tukruni
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Comparison of Three TR Band Deflation Protocols Following Radial Coronary Procedures: A Prospective Randomized Trial Ebtisam A. Elhihi Rudaynah H. Alromaili Sadakhathulla Valiyapeediakkal Rahaf H. Alsharif Lubina M. Ashraf Abdul Rasheed V. Abdul Rassak Marwin R. Patarasa Roaa S. Fouta Muhammed R. Elamkulavan Razan W. Alsulaimani Asma S. Alrizqi Mifas Meleraroth Amani Bakr Albandar Amani B. Tukruni Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions ABSTRACT Background Radial artery hemostasis can be achieved through a variety of methods after the excision of the sheath. The risk of radial artery blockage presents a challenge linked to the radial approach, potentially limiting its future application. The patent hemostasis method effectively achieves hemostasis while maintaining the patency of the radial artery, thereby reducing the likelihood of radial artery occlusion. Aims The aim of this study was to compare three TR band deflation protocols (early initiation with long intervals, delayed initiation with short intervals, and routine protocol) to determine the optimum approach for TR band deflation following radial coronary procedures. Methods A randomized controlled trial was performed at King Abdullah Medical City, including 207 cardiac patients undergoing trans‐radial coronary procedures. The TR band was utilized with the patented hemostasis technique, wherein 2 mL of air was injected following the detection of the radial pulse on pulse oximetry after complete occlusion with 16 mL of air. Patients were randomized using electronic randomization in a 1:1:1 ratio into three groups. Total time for TR band removal, bleeding complications, and radial artery occlusions' occurrence were measured through one tool developed by the researcher. This study was conducted in accordance with the CONSORT guidelines. Results A total of 207 patients were recruited. Protocols A, B, and C had significantly different mean percentages of total TR band removal time (194.1 ± 38.15, 200.1 ± 27.2, and 152.9 ± 59.4, p  = 0.000). The three groups had similar bleeding rates (11.8%, 15.9%, and 22.9%; p  = 0.2). The study indicated that 10.3% of patients in protocol A, 7.2% in protocol B, and 22.9% in protocol C reported bleeding during the first hour from starting the protocol, with a significant difference ( p  = 0.01). In the second hour, 1.4% of protocol B patients had small hematomas (< 5 cm). No incidence of radial artery occlusion was observed in any group. Conclusion The early protocol appears to be the most effective in reducing the incidence of bleeding complications, while the routine protocol offers a faster approach but is associated with earlier bleeding complications. 10.1002/ccd.70517 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
title Comparison of Three TR Band Deflation Protocols Following Radial Coronary Procedures: A Prospective Randomized Trial
topic Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ccd.70517