Outcomes of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aamer Ubaid, Arindam Bagga, Kevin Kennedy, John T. Saxon, Chetan P. Huded
Format: Artículo Open Access
Published: Wiley 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867014714145374208
author Aamer Ubaid
Arindam Bagga
Kevin Kennedy
John T. Saxon
Chetan P. Huded
author_facet Aamer Ubaid
Arindam Bagga
Kevin Kennedy
John T. Saxon
Chetan P. Huded
Aamer Ubaid
Arindam Bagga
Kevin Kennedy
John T. Saxon
Chetan P. Huded
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Outcomes of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction Aamer Ubaid Arindam Bagga Kevin Kennedy John T. Saxon Chetan P. Huded Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions ABSTRACT Background Patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) were excluded from major trials of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). Aim The objective of this study was to describe this population and evaluate outcomes after LAAO in patients with and without HFrEF. Methods Patients with and without HFrEF undergoing LAAO were identified in the Nationwide Readmissions Database from 2016 to 2020. Outcomes of interest were major in‐hospital adverse events (death, stroke, pericardial effusion, tamponade, pericardial window, transfusion) and 6‐month readmissions (any readmission, heart failure readmission, death/stroke readmission). To account for differences between patients with and without HFrEF, outcomes were evaluated using risk‐adjusted logistic regression models and risk‐adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. Results Of 50,526 encounters for LAAO, 5895 (11.7%) patients had HFrEF. The HFrEF group had a lower proportion of women and a higher proportion of major cardiovascular comorbidities. CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASC score was 3.8 ± 1.3 in the HFrEF group and 3.7 ± 1.4 in those without HFrEF. HFrEF was associated with a higher risk of composite in‐hospital major adverse events (6.0% vs. 5.0%, adjusted OR 1.23 [95% CI 1.09−1.40], p  = 0.001) and a higher risk of 6‐month all‐cause readmission (adjusted HR 1.18 [95% CI 1.08−1.28], p  < 0.001), heart failure readmission (adjusted HR 1.59 [95% CI 1.46−1.72], p  < 0.001), and readmission with death or stroke (adjusted HR 1.27 [95% CI 1.03−1.57], p  = 0.001). Conclusion One out of nine patients treated with LAAO in the United States has HFrEF, which is associated with a higher risk of major in‐hospital complications and hospital readmission. 10.1002/ccd.70607 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ccd.70607
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1002_ccd_70607
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
publishDate 2026
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Outcomes of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
Aamer Ubaid
Arindam Bagga
Kevin Kennedy
John T. Saxon
Chetan P. Huded
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Outcomes of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction Aamer Ubaid Arindam Bagga Kevin Kennedy John T. Saxon Chetan P. Huded Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions ABSTRACT Background Patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) were excluded from major trials of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). Aim The objective of this study was to describe this population and evaluate outcomes after LAAO in patients with and without HFrEF. Methods Patients with and without HFrEF undergoing LAAO were identified in the Nationwide Readmissions Database from 2016 to 2020. Outcomes of interest were major in‐hospital adverse events (death, stroke, pericardial effusion, tamponade, pericardial window, transfusion) and 6‐month readmissions (any readmission, heart failure readmission, death/stroke readmission). To account for differences between patients with and without HFrEF, outcomes were evaluated using risk‐adjusted logistic regression models and risk‐adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. Results Of 50,526 encounters for LAAO, 5895 (11.7%) patients had HFrEF. The HFrEF group had a lower proportion of women and a higher proportion of major cardiovascular comorbidities. CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASC score was 3.8 ± 1.3 in the HFrEF group and 3.7 ± 1.4 in those without HFrEF. HFrEF was associated with a higher risk of composite in‐hospital major adverse events (6.0% vs. 5.0%, adjusted OR 1.23 [95% CI 1.09−1.40], p  = 0.001) and a higher risk of 6‐month all‐cause readmission (adjusted HR 1.18 [95% CI 1.08−1.28], p  < 0.001), heart failure readmission (adjusted HR 1.59 [95% CI 1.46−1.72], p  < 0.001), and readmission with death or stroke (adjusted HR 1.27 [95% CI 1.03−1.57], p  = 0.001). Conclusion One out of nine patients treated with LAAO in the United States has HFrEF, which is associated with a higher risk of major in‐hospital complications and hospital readmission. 10.1002/ccd.70607 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
title Outcomes of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
topic Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ccd.70607