Cover Image

The new rehabilitation definition for research purposes could improve rehabilitation description in Cochrane Systematic Reviews

Fuente: Wiley Open Access

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Irene Battel, Chiara Arienti, William Levack, Carlotte Kiekens, Stefano Negrini
Format:	Artículo Open Access
Published:	Wiley 2024
Subjects:	Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods
Online Access:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items

A simple form could prevent authorship issues in Cochrane manuscripts: A cohort study
by: Siv Fonnes, et al.
Published: (2024)

Cochrane's COVID‐19 Living Systematic Reviews: A Mixed‐Methods Study of Their Conduct, Reporting and Currency
by: Kevindu De Silva, et al.
Published: (2025)

An evaluation of the recommendations for primary nutrition research addressing noncommunicable disease using the EPICOT+ framework: A cross‐sectional descriptive meta‐research study of Cochrane nutrition systematic reviews
by: Sheena Ruzive, et al.
Published: (2024)

Artificial Intelligence and Automation in Evidence Synthesis: An Investigation of Methods Employed in Cochrane, Campbell Collaboration, and Environmental Evidence Reviews
by: Kristen L. Scotti, et al.
Published: (2025)

Coproducing a Cochrane Qualitative Evidence Synthesis: Process, Outcomes, and Reflections on Power
by: Bronwen Merner, et al.
Published: (2025)

Promoting the Implementation of Co‐Produced Cochrane Evidence: An Exploratory Study of Improving Partnering With Consumers
by: Bronwen Merner, et al.
Published: (2026)

Analysis of Cochrane systematic reviews: A comprehensive study of impact and influence from 1998 to 2024
by: Amin Sharifan
Published: (2024)

Publication barriers and facilitators of Cochrane authors in sub‐Saharan Africa: A mixed‐methods study
by: Idriss I. Kallon, et al.
Published: (2024)

Mechanical ventilation core outcome set uptake in Cochrane systematic reviews: A cross‐sectional study
by: Luis Garegnani, et al.
Published: (2024)

Correction to “Artificial Intelligence and Automation in Evidence Synthesis: An Investigation of Methods Employed in Cochrane, Campbell Collaboration, and Environmental Evidence Reviews,” “Creating Interactive Data Dashboards for Evidence Syntheses,” and “Using GPT‐4 for Title and Abstract Screening in a Literature Review of Public Policies: A Feasibility Study”
Published: (2026)

“Interest‐holders”: A new term to replace “stakeholders” in the context of health research and policy
by: Elie A. Akl, et al.
Published: (2024)

Do We Need Systematic Reviews of Research Priority Setting? A Proposal for a New Concept on Conducting Systematic Reviews of Research Priority Setting Exercises
by: Mona Nasser, et al.
Published: (2026)

Using Large Language Models to Address Contextual Questions in Systematic Reviews
by: Susanne Hempel, et al.
Published: (2026)

Split Body Trials in Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses: A Tutorial
by: Nuala Livingstone, et al.
Published: (2025)

Health Equity in Systematic Reviews: A Tutorial—Part 1 Getting Started With Health Equity in Your Review
by: Jennifer Petkovic, et al.
Published: (2025)

RETRACTED: Human‐in‐the‐Loop Artificial Intelligence System for Systematic Literature Review: Methods and Validations for the AutoLit Review Software
by: Kevin M. Kallmes, et al.
Published: (2025)

Analyzing the Utility of Openalex to Identify Studies for Systematic Reviews: Methods and a Case Study
by: Claire Stansfield, et al.
Published: (2025)

Influence of Social and Demographic Factors on Retinoblastoma Outcomes in the United States: A Systematic Review
by: Vijay Joshi, et al.
Published: (2026)

Harnessing Large‐Language Models for Efficient Data Extraction in Systematic Reviews: The Role of Prompt Engineering
by: Molly Murton, et al.
Published: (2025)

The Impact on Systematic Reviews of Risk of Bias Assessment Changes From Conference Abstracts to Full Text
by: Ryan P. W. Kenny, et al.
Published: (2026)

Systematic Reviews as Part of Doctoral Theses and for the Promotion to Associate Professor: A Descriptive Study of University Policies in Sweden
by: Martin Ringsten, et al.
Published: (2026)

A New Process Model of Study Identification Specific to the Identification of Randomised Studies for Systematic Reviews of Medical Interventions
by: Chris Cooper, et al.
Published: (2025)

Impact of a Research Integrity Assessment (RIA) of Randomized Controlled Trials Included in Interventional COVID‐19 Systematic Reviews: A Meta‐Epidemiological Study
by: Stephanie Weibel, et al.
Published: (2026)

Don't Stop Me Now, `Cause I'm Having a Good Time Screening: Evaluation of Stopping Methods for Safe Use of Priority Screening in Systematic Reviews
by: Tim Repke, et al.
Published: (2026)

Developing CAMELOT for assessing methodological limitations of qualitative research for inclusion in qualitative evidence syntheses
by: Heather M. Munthe‐Kaas, et al.
Published: (2024)

Menu labeling and portion size control to improve the out‐of‐home food environment: A scoping review
by: Kathiresan Jeyashree, et al.
Published: (2024)

Systematic reviews of clinical laboratory studies: Pilot risk of bias tool developed by consensus
by: Tilly Fox, et al.
Published: (2024)

Methods of Engaging Interest‐Holders in Healthcare Evidence Syntheses: A Scoping Review
by: Alex Todhunter‐Brown, et al.
Published: (2026)

Using GPT‐4 for Title and Abstract Screening in a Literature Review of Public Policies: A Feasibility Study
by: Max Rubinstein, et al.
Published: (2025)

Ninety‐Seven Percent of Trials Investigating Robotic Interventions in Physiotherapy Contained Abstract Spin: A Meta‐Research Review
by: Hilary Tier, et al.
Published: (2026)

Assessing the Feasibility and Acceptability of a Bespoke Large Language Model Pipeline to Extract Data From Different Study Designs for Public Health Evidence Reviews
by: Zalaya Simmons, et al.
Published: (2025)

Using a Large Language Model (ChatGPT‐4o) to Assess the Risk of Bias in Randomized Controlled Trials of Medical Interventions: Interrater Agreement With Human Reviewers
by: Christopher James Rose, et al.
Published: (2025)

Artificial Intelligence Search Tools for Evidence Synthesis: Comparative Analysis and Implementation Recommendations
by: Robin Featherstone, et al.
Published: (2025)

Incorporating uncertainty in the baseline risk: An R Shiny tool and an empirical study
by: M. Hassan Murad, et al.
Published: (2025)

Trustworthiness assessment of published clinical trials: Literature review of domains and questions
by: Zarko Alfirevic, et al.
Published: (2024)

What are the methodological characteristics of evidence and gap maps? A systematic review and evidence and gap map
by: Mary Fredlund, et al.
Published: (2024)

Issue Information
Published: (2024)

Development of a topic‐specific bibliographic database supporting the updates of SPIRIT 2013 and CONSORT 2010
by: Lasse Østengaard, et al.
Published: (2024)

Inclusion, characteristics and methodological limitations of systematic reviews in doctoral theses: A cross‐sectional study of all universities in Sweden
by: M. Ringsten, et al.
Published: (2025)

Multiple Long‐Term Conditions, Co‐Long‐Term Conditions and Polyvascular Disease: Considerations for Evidence Synthesis and Meta‐Analyses
by: Gillian Mead, et al.
Published: (2025)