Copertina

Meta‐epidemiological study on the publication rate of South American countries' systematic reviews of interventions registered in PROSPERO

Fuente: Wiley Open Access

Salvato in:

Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali:	Mariana A. Burgos, Diego Ivaldi, Gisela Oltra, Camila M. Escobar Liquitay, Luis Garegnani
Natura:	Artículo Open Access
Pubblicazione:	Wiley 2024
Soggetti:	Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods
Accesso online:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Aggiungi Tag Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!

Documenti analoghi

Mechanical ventilation core outcome set uptake in Cochrane systematic reviews: A cross‐sectional study
di: Luis Garegnani, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Single‐arm interventional versus observational studies for assessing efficacy: A meta‐epidemiological study
di: Mary Chappell, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Methodological and reporting quality of systematic and rapid reviews on human mpox and their utility during a public health emergency
di: Kusala Pussegoda, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

The effects of public health and social measures (PHSM) implemented during the COVID‐19 pandemic: An overview of systematic reviews
di: Racha Fadlallah, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Quality of systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in dermatology
di: Annapoorani Muthiah, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Common statistical errors in systematic reviews: A tutorial
di: Afroditi Kanellopoulou, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Guidance for systematic reviews in journal author instructions: Findings and recommendations for editorial teams
di: Nele S. Pauwels, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Consideration of health inequity in systematic reviews and primary studies on risk factors for hearing loss
di: Simon Briscoe, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

What are the methodological characteristics of evidence and gap maps? A systematic review and evidence and gap map
di: Mary Fredlund, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Analysis of Cochrane systematic reviews: A comprehensive study of impact and influence from 1998 to 2024
di: Amin Sharifan
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Certainty of evidence assessment in high‐impact medical journals: A meta‐epidemiological survey
di: Madelin R. Siedler, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Inclusion, characteristics and methodological limitations of systematic reviews in doctoral theses: A cross‐sectional study of all universities in Sweden
di: M. Ringsten, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Ninety‐Seven Percent of Trials Investigating Robotic Interventions in Physiotherapy Contained Abstract Spin: A Meta‐Research Review
di: Hilary Tier, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

An evaluation of the recommendations for primary nutrition research addressing noncommunicable disease using the EPICOT+ framework: A cross‐sectional descriptive meta‐research study of Cochrane nutrition systematic reviews
di: Sheena Ruzive, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Count data, rates, rate differences, and rate ratios in meta‐analysis: A tutorial
di: Christopher James Rose, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Sensitivity Analysis in Meta‐Analysis: A Tutorial
di: Nyan Min Aung, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Meta‐Analysis Using Time‐to‐Event Data: A Tutorial
di: Ashma Krishan, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Split Body Trials in Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses: A Tutorial
di: Nuala Livingstone, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Leveraging AI for Meta‐Analysis: Evaluating LLMs in Detecting Publication Bias for Next‐Generation Evidence Synthesis
di: Xing Xing, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

A scoping review: Screening questionnaires for identifying tanning addiction
di: John Meisenheimer, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Trustworthiness assessment of published clinical trials: Literature review of domains and questions
di: Zarko Alfirevic, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Multiple Long‐Term Conditions, Co‐Long‐Term Conditions and Polyvascular Disease: Considerations for Evidence Synthesis and Meta‐Analyses
di: Gillian Mead, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Systematic reviews of clinical laboratory studies: Pilot risk of bias tool developed by consensus
di: Tilly Fox, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Impact of a Research Integrity Assessment (RIA) of Randomized Controlled Trials Included in Interventional COVID‐19 Systematic Reviews: A Meta‐Epidemiological Study
di: Stephanie Weibel, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Menu labeling and portion size control to improve the out‐of‐home food environment: A scoping review
di: Kathiresan Jeyashree, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Enhancing nursing and other healthcare professionals' knowledge of childhood sexual abuse through self‐assessment: A realist review
di: Olumide Adisa, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Artificial Intelligence Search Tools for Evidence Synthesis: Comparative Analysis and Implementation Recommendations
di: Robin Featherstone, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Incorporating uncertainty in the baseline risk: An R Shiny tool and an empirical study
di: M. Hassan Murad, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Coproducing a Cochrane Qualitative Evidence Synthesis: Process, Outcomes, and Reflections on Power
di: Bronwen Merner, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Systematic Reviews as Part of Doctoral Theses and for the Promotion to Associate Professor: A Descriptive Study of University Policies in Sweden
di: Martin Ringsten, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

RETRACTED: Human‐in‐the‐Loop Artificial Intelligence System for Systematic Literature Review: Methods and Validations for the AutoLit Review Software
di: Kevin M. Kallmes, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Issue Information
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Development of a topic‐specific bibliographic database supporting the updates of SPIRIT 2013 and CONSORT 2010
di: Lasse Østengaard, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Issue Information
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Issue Information
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Issue Information
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Issue Information
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Using a Large Language Model (ChatGPT‐4o) to Assess the Risk of Bias in Randomized Controlled Trials of Medical Interventions: Interrater Agreement With Human Reviewers
di: Christopher James Rose, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

A New Process Model of Study Identification Specific to the Identification of Randomised Studies for Systematic Reviews of Medical Interventions
di: Chris Cooper, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Correction to “Artificial Intelligence and Automation in Evidence Synthesis: An Investigation of Methods Employed in Cochrane, Campbell Collaboration, and Environmental Evidence Reviews,” “Creating Interactive Data Dashboards for Evidence Syntheses,” and “Using GPT‐4 for Title and Abstract Screening in a Literature Review of Public Policies: A Feasibility Study”
Pubblicazione: (2026)