Copertina

Creating Interactive Data Dashboards for Evidence Syntheses

Fuente: Wiley Open Access

Salvato in:

Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali:	Leslie A. Perdue, Shaina D. Trevino, Sean Grant, Jennifer S. Lin, Emily E. Tanner‐Smith
Natura:	Artículo Open Access
Pubblicazione:	Wiley 2025
Soggetti:	Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods
Accesso online:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Aggiungi Tag Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!

Documenti analoghi

Correction to “Artificial Intelligence and Automation in Evidence Synthesis: An Investigation of Methods Employed in Cochrane, Campbell Collaboration, and Environmental Evidence Reviews,” “Creating Interactive Data Dashboards for Evidence Syntheses,” and “Using GPT‐4 for Title and Abstract Screening in a Literature Review of Public Policies: A Feasibility Study”
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Methods of Engaging Interest‐Holders in Healthcare Evidence Syntheses: A Scoping Review
di: Alex Todhunter‐Brown, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Using GPT‐4 for Title and Abstract Screening in a Literature Review of Public Policies: A Feasibility Study
di: Max Rubinstein, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Artificial Intelligence and Automation in Evidence Synthesis: An Investigation of Methods Employed in Cochrane, Campbell Collaboration, and Environmental Evidence Reviews
di: Kristen L. Scotti, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Leveraging AI for Meta‐Analysis: Evaluating LLMs in Detecting Publication Bias for Next‐Generation Evidence Synthesis
di: Xing Xing, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Assessing the Feasibility and Acceptability of a Bespoke Large Language Model Pipeline to Extract Data From Different Study Designs for Public Health Evidence Reviews
di: Zalaya Simmons, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Artificial Intelligence Search Tools for Evidence Synthesis: Comparative Analysis and Implementation Recommendations
di: Robin Featherstone, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Coproducing a Cochrane Qualitative Evidence Synthesis: Process, Outcomes, and Reflections on Power
di: Bronwen Merner, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Promoting the Implementation of Co‐Produced Cochrane Evidence: An Exploratory Study of Improving Partnering With Consumers
di: Bronwen Merner, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Influence of Social and Demographic Factors on Retinoblastoma Outcomes in the United States: A Systematic Review
di: Vijay Joshi, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Enhancing Evidence Synthesis Efficiency: Leveraging Large Language Models and Agentic Workflows for Optimized Literature Screening
di: Bing Hu, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

A Co‐production Evaluation Tool Informed by Co‐production Workshops for Use in Evidence Synthesis Contexts
di: Meena Khatwa, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Better Together: Tools to Aid Patient and Public Involvement in Evidence Synthesis and the Need for Consensus on Essential Reporting Items
di: Eugenie Evelynne Johnson, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Multiple Long‐Term Conditions, Co‐Long‐Term Conditions and Polyvascular Disease: Considerations for Evidence Synthesis and Meta‐Analyses
di: Gillian Mead, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Meta‐Analysis Using Time‐to‐Event Data: A Tutorial
di: Ashma Krishan, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Incorporating uncertainty in the baseline risk: An R Shiny tool and an empirical study
di: M. Hassan Murad, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Harnessing Large‐Language Models for Efficient Data Extraction in Systematic Reviews: The Role of Prompt Engineering
di: Molly Murton, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

“Interest‐holders”: A new term to replace “stakeholders” in the context of health research and policy
di: Elie A. Akl, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Health Equity in Systematic Reviews: A Tutorial—Part 1 Getting Started With Health Equity in Your Review
di: Jennifer Petkovic, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

An evaluation of the recommendations for primary nutrition research addressing noncommunicable disease using the EPICOT+ framework: A cross‐sectional descriptive meta‐research study of Cochrane nutrition systematic reviews
di: Sheena Ruzive, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Meta‐epidemiological study on the publication rate of South American countries' systematic reviews of interventions registered in PROSPERO
di: Mariana A. Burgos, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Systematic reviews of clinical laboratory studies: Pilot risk of bias tool developed by consensus
di: Tilly Fox, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Publication barriers and facilitators of Cochrane authors in sub‐Saharan Africa: A mixed‐methods study
di: Idriss I. Kallon, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

The effects of public health and social measures (PHSM) implemented during the COVID‐19 pandemic: An overview of systematic reviews
di: Racha Fadlallah, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Certainty of evidence assessment in high‐impact medical journals: A meta‐epidemiological survey
di: Madelin R. Siedler, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

RETRACTED: Human‐in‐the‐Loop Artificial Intelligence System for Systematic Literature Review: Methods and Validations for the AutoLit Review Software
di: Kevin M. Kallmes, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Inclusion, characteristics and methodological limitations of systematic reviews in doctoral theses: A cross‐sectional study of all universities in Sweden
di: M. Ringsten, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Issue Information
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Using a Large Language Model (ChatGPT‐4o) to Assess the Risk of Bias in Randomized Controlled Trials of Medical Interventions: Interrater Agreement With Human Reviewers
di: Christopher James Rose, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

A New Process Model of Study Identification Specific to the Identification of Randomised Studies for Systematic Reviews of Medical Interventions
di: Chris Cooper, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Issue Information
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Single‐arm interventional versus observational studies for assessing efficacy: A meta‐epidemiological study
di: Mary Chappell, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Count data, rates, rate differences, and rate ratios in meta‐analysis: A tutorial
di: Christopher James Rose, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Analyzing the Utility of Openalex to Identify Studies for Systematic Reviews: Methods and a Case Study
di: Claire Stansfield, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Enhancing nursing and other healthcare professionals' knowledge of childhood sexual abuse through self‐assessment: A realist review
di: Olumide Adisa, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Issue Information
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Issue Information
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Cochrane's COVID‐19 Living Systematic Reviews: A Mixed‐Methods Study of Their Conduct, Reporting and Currency
di: Kevindu De Silva, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Assessing the reporting quality of published qualitative evidence syntheses in the cochrane library
di: Martina Giltenane, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Split Body Trials in Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses: A Tutorial
di: Nuala Livingstone, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)