Deactivation mechanism for water splitting: Recent advances

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Yansong Jia, Yang Li, Qiong Zhang, Sohail Yasin, Xinyu Zheng, Kai Ma, Zhengli Hua, Jianfeng Shi, Chaohua Gu, Yuhai Dou, Shixue Dou
Format: Artículo Open Access
Veröffentlicht: Wiley 2024
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1867019602834227200
author Yansong Jia
Yang Li
Qiong Zhang
Sohail Yasin
Xinyu Zheng
Kai Ma
Zhengli Hua
Jianfeng Shi
Chaohua Gu
Yuhai Dou
Shixue Dou
author_facet Yansong Jia
Yang Li
Qiong Zhang
Sohail Yasin
Xinyu Zheng
Kai Ma
Zhengli Hua
Jianfeng Shi
Chaohua Gu
Yuhai Dou
Shixue Dou
Yansong Jia
Yang Li
Qiong Zhang
Sohail Yasin
Xinyu Zheng
Kai Ma
Zhengli Hua
Jianfeng Shi
Chaohua Gu
Yuhai Dou
Shixue Dou
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Deactivation mechanism for water splitting: Recent advances Yansong Jia Yang Li Qiong Zhang Sohail Yasin Xinyu Zheng Kai Ma Zhengli Hua Jianfeng Shi Chaohua Gu Yuhai Dou Shixue Dou Carbon Energy AbstractHydrogen (H2) has been regarded as a promising alternative to fossil‐fuel energy. Green H2 produced via water electrolysis (WE) powered by renewable energy could achieve a zero‐carbon footprint. Considerable attention has been focused on developing highly active catalysts to facilitate the reaction kinetics and improve the energy efficiency of WE. However, the stability of the electrocatalysts hampers the commercial viability of WE. Few studies have elucidated the origin of catalyst degradation. In this review, we first discuss the WE mechanism, including anodic oxygen evolution reaction (OER) and cathodic hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). Then, we provide strategies used to enhance the stability of electrocatalysts. After that, the deactivation mechanisms of the typical commercialized HER and OER catalysts, including Pt, Ni, RuO2, and IrO2, are summarized. Finally, the influence of fluctuating energy on catalyst degradation is highlighted and in situ characterization methodologies for understanding the dynamic deactivation processes are described. 10.1002/cey2.528 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cey2.528
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1002_cey2_528
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
publishDate 2024
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Deactivation mechanism for water splitting: Recent advances
Yansong Jia
Yang Li
Qiong Zhang
Sohail Yasin
Xinyu Zheng
Kai Ma
Zhengli Hua
Jianfeng Shi
Chaohua Gu
Yuhai Dou
Shixue Dou
Carbon Energy
Deactivation mechanism for water splitting: Recent advances Yansong Jia Yang Li Qiong Zhang Sohail Yasin Xinyu Zheng Kai Ma Zhengli Hua Jianfeng Shi Chaohua Gu Yuhai Dou Shixue Dou Carbon Energy AbstractHydrogen (H2) has been regarded as a promising alternative to fossil‐fuel energy. Green H2 produced via water electrolysis (WE) powered by renewable energy could achieve a zero‐carbon footprint. Considerable attention has been focused on developing highly active catalysts to facilitate the reaction kinetics and improve the energy efficiency of WE. However, the stability of the electrocatalysts hampers the commercial viability of WE. Few studies have elucidated the origin of catalyst degradation. In this review, we first discuss the WE mechanism, including anodic oxygen evolution reaction (OER) and cathodic hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). Then, we provide strategies used to enhance the stability of electrocatalysts. After that, the deactivation mechanisms of the typical commercialized HER and OER catalysts, including Pt, Ni, RuO2, and IrO2, are summarized. Finally, the influence of fluctuating energy on catalyst degradation is highlighted and in situ characterization methodologies for understanding the dynamic deactivation processes are described. 10.1002/cey2.528 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
title Deactivation mechanism for water splitting: Recent advances
topic Carbon Energy
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cey2.528