Expanding the cross‐cultural validity of the Enright Forgiveness Inventory short form
Fuente:
Wiley Open Access
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artículo Open Access |
| Published: |
Wiley
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867002245479923712 |
|---|---|
| author | Jacqueline Y. Song Romulo Lustosa Julio Rique John Klatt Lifan Yu Nahlah Mandurah Jichan J. Kim Robert D. Enright |
| author_facet | Jacqueline Y. Song Romulo Lustosa Julio Rique John Klatt Lifan Yu Nahlah Mandurah Jichan J. Kim Robert D. Enright Jacqueline Y. Song Romulo Lustosa Julio Rique John Klatt Lifan Yu Nahlah Mandurah Jichan J. Kim Robert D. Enright |
| collection | Wiley Open Access |
| contents | Expanding the cross‐cultural validity of the Enright Forgiveness Inventory short form Jacqueline Y. Song Romulo Lustosa Julio Rique John Klatt Lifan Yu Nahlah Mandurah Jichan J. Kim Robert D. Enright Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy AbstractThis research assessed the cross‐cultural validity and internal consistency of the Enright Forgiveness Inventory short form (EFI‐30). A total of 1677 people across four countries (United States, the Philippines, China and Saudi Arabia) participated in the study. Data analysis relied on multigroup confirmatory factor analysis and assessments of internal consistency. The results indicated that the EFI‐30 has the same structure and factor loadings in the four countries and that internal consistency for the EFI‐30 factors was >0.80 in the four countries. The discrimination values suggest that the instrument can differentiate people with different levels of forgiveness. The analyses in this study indicate that the EFI‐30 is a valid and reliable assessment of cognition, behaviour and affect related to forgiveness in the United States, the Philippines, China and Saudi Arabia. Clinicians working in these countries can confidently use this shorter version of the EFI to measure forgiveness. 10.1002/cpp.2960 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/cpp.2960 |
| format | Artículo Open Access |
| id | wiley_oa_10_1002_cpp_2960 |
| institution | Wiley Open Access |
| license_str_mv | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | wiley_oa |
| spellingShingle | Expanding the cross‐cultural validity of the Enright Forgiveness Inventory short form Jacqueline Y. Song Romulo Lustosa Julio Rique John Klatt Lifan Yu Nahlah Mandurah Jichan J. Kim Robert D. Enright Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy Expanding the cross‐cultural validity of the Enright Forgiveness Inventory short form Jacqueline Y. Song Romulo Lustosa Julio Rique John Klatt Lifan Yu Nahlah Mandurah Jichan J. Kim Robert D. Enright Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy AbstractThis research assessed the cross‐cultural validity and internal consistency of the Enright Forgiveness Inventory short form (EFI‐30). A total of 1677 people across four countries (United States, the Philippines, China and Saudi Arabia) participated in the study. Data analysis relied on multigroup confirmatory factor analysis and assessments of internal consistency. The results indicated that the EFI‐30 has the same structure and factor loadings in the four countries and that internal consistency for the EFI‐30 factors was >0.80 in the four countries. The discrimination values suggest that the instrument can differentiate people with different levels of forgiveness. The analyses in this study indicate that the EFI‐30 is a valid and reliable assessment of cognition, behaviour and affect related to forgiveness in the United States, the Philippines, China and Saudi Arabia. Clinicians working in these countries can confidently use this shorter version of the EFI to measure forgiveness. 10.1002/cpp.2960 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor |
| title | Expanding the cross‐cultural validity of the Enright Forgiveness Inventory short form |
| topic | Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy |
| url | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.2960 |