Better Safe Than Sorry. A Scoping Review of Monitoring for Negative Effects in Preregistrations of Psychological Interventions

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jacoba Jeckel, Christian Thiele, Gerrit Hirschfeld, Tobias Teismann, Silvia Schneider, Ruth von Brachel
Format: Artículo Open Access
Published: Wiley 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867014379575181312
author Jacoba Jeckel
Christian Thiele
Gerrit Hirschfeld
Tobias Teismann
Silvia Schneider
Ruth von Brachel
author_facet Jacoba Jeckel
Christian Thiele
Gerrit Hirschfeld
Tobias Teismann
Silvia Schneider
Ruth von Brachel
Jacoba Jeckel
Christian Thiele
Gerrit Hirschfeld
Tobias Teismann
Silvia Schneider
Ruth von Brachel
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Better Safe Than Sorry. A Scoping Review of Monitoring for Negative Effects in Preregistrations of Psychological Interventions Jacoba Jeckel Christian Thiele Gerrit Hirschfeld Tobias Teismann Silvia Schneider Ruth von Brachel Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy ABSTRACTAlthough negative effects of psychological interventions are suspected to be common, they are rarely investigated. Experts and international guidelines agree that monitoring for negative effects in clinical studies is needed to make psychological interventions safer and to empower patients before they give their consent to participate. Therefore, monitoring should already be considered during planning and preregistration of a study. The aim of this scoping review was to find out how frequently studies on psychological interventions monitor their negative effects according to preregistrations and to investigate reasons why monitoring is not carried out. Preregistrations of psychological interventions on ClinicalTrials.gov were scrutinized for information on monitoring of negative effects and other study characteristics. In a survey, researchers of studies where no monitoring was reported were asked for reasons for not doing so. Overall, 2231 preregistrations of psychological interventions were found; of these, only 3.4% included explicit information on monitoring for negative effects. In the survey, more researchers reported having conducted monitoring, although the type of monitoring was often inadequate. The type of monitoring varied widely, and specific monitoring measurements were rarely used repeatedly. Monitoring for negative effects was more prevalent in studies investigating treatments versus low‐threshold interventions, in studies conducted in Europe versus other continents and in more recent studies. Researchers reported lack of knowledge as the most frequent reason for not monitoring negative effects. Our results imply a lack of monitoring and inconsistent information on negative effects in preregistrations, with inconsistent use of the term monitoring and measurements, and a lack of knowledge among researchers. Improved knowledge and a standardized approach, starting with an adequate preregistration, would be helpful to routinely examine negative effects in psychological interventions to make them safer and better. 10.1002/cpp.2968 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cpp.2968
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1002_cpp_2968
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
publishDate 2024
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Better Safe Than Sorry. A Scoping Review of Monitoring for Negative Effects in Preregistrations of Psychological Interventions
Jacoba Jeckel
Christian Thiele
Gerrit Hirschfeld
Tobias Teismann
Silvia Schneider
Ruth von Brachel
Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
Better Safe Than Sorry. A Scoping Review of Monitoring for Negative Effects in Preregistrations of Psychological Interventions Jacoba Jeckel Christian Thiele Gerrit Hirschfeld Tobias Teismann Silvia Schneider Ruth von Brachel Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy ABSTRACTAlthough negative effects of psychological interventions are suspected to be common, they are rarely investigated. Experts and international guidelines agree that monitoring for negative effects in clinical studies is needed to make psychological interventions safer and to empower patients before they give their consent to participate. Therefore, monitoring should already be considered during planning and preregistration of a study. The aim of this scoping review was to find out how frequently studies on psychological interventions monitor their negative effects according to preregistrations and to investigate reasons why monitoring is not carried out. Preregistrations of psychological interventions on ClinicalTrials.gov were scrutinized for information on monitoring of negative effects and other study characteristics. In a survey, researchers of studies where no monitoring was reported were asked for reasons for not doing so. Overall, 2231 preregistrations of psychological interventions were found; of these, only 3.4% included explicit information on monitoring for negative effects. In the survey, more researchers reported having conducted monitoring, although the type of monitoring was often inadequate. The type of monitoring varied widely, and specific monitoring measurements were rarely used repeatedly. Monitoring for negative effects was more prevalent in studies investigating treatments versus low‐threshold interventions, in studies conducted in Europe versus other continents and in more recent studies. Researchers reported lack of knowledge as the most frequent reason for not monitoring negative effects. Our results imply a lack of monitoring and inconsistent information on negative effects in preregistrations, with inconsistent use of the term monitoring and measurements, and a lack of knowledge among researchers. Improved knowledge and a standardized approach, starting with an adequate preregistration, would be helpful to routinely examine negative effects in psychological interventions to make them safer and better. 10.1002/cpp.2968 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
title Better Safe Than Sorry. A Scoping Review of Monitoring for Negative Effects in Preregistrations of Psychological Interventions
topic Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.2968