Mental Pain Questionnaire: Clinimetric Properties of a Potential Global Person‐Centred Outcome Measure
Fuente:
Wiley Open Access
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artículo Open Access |
| Published: |
Wiley
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867013496405753857 |
|---|---|
| author | Fiammetta Cosci Danilo Carrozzino Chiara Patierno Sara Romanazzo Carmen Berrocal Alberto Chiarugi Francesco De Cesaris Serena Guiducci Giovanni Mansueto Kaj Sparle Christensen Tom Sensky |
| author_facet | Fiammetta Cosci Danilo Carrozzino Chiara Patierno Sara Romanazzo Carmen Berrocal Alberto Chiarugi Francesco De Cesaris Serena Guiducci Giovanni Mansueto Kaj Sparle Christensen Tom Sensky Fiammetta Cosci Danilo Carrozzino Chiara Patierno Sara Romanazzo Carmen Berrocal Alberto Chiarugi Francesco De Cesaris Serena Guiducci Giovanni Mansueto Kaj Sparle Christensen Tom Sensky |
| collection | Wiley Open Access |
| contents | Mental Pain Questionnaire: Clinimetric Properties of a Potential Global Person‐Centred Outcome Measure Fiammetta Cosci Danilo Carrozzino Chiara Patierno Sara Romanazzo Carmen Berrocal Alberto Chiarugi Francesco De Cesaris Serena Guiducci Giovanni Mansueto Kaj Sparle Christensen Tom Sensky Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy ABSTRACTIntroductionThe Mental Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) was developed using a clinimetric approach to bring together the key features of mental pain into a single, brief, transdiagnostic scale. The present study aims at extending the validation of the MPQ to people from three different clinical settings.MethodsA multicentre, cross‐sectional study on adults diagnosed with migraine (n = 256), systemic sclerosis (n = 219), or mental disorders (n = 138) was conducted. The MPQ was administered; Rasch and Mokken analyses were performed to assess clinimetric validity.ResultsThe overall fit to the Rasch model indicated a misfit, improved by the exclusion of a single item. MPQ showed to be unidimensional. MPQ total score and individual items scalability were optimal except for the same item. The total MPQ score showed an optimal scalability for the systemic sclerosis sample and an acceptable scalability for the migraine and mental disorders samples. Local dependency was found between two pairs of items. Person separation reliability indices (PSI 0.45) showed that the MPQ could not distinguish between groups with different levels of mental pain.ConclusionMental pain has the potential to serve as a truly generic patient‐centred outcome measure. Recommendations are made for revisions of the original MPQ, but these will require testing in further validation studies. 10.1002/cpp.70022 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/cpp.70022 |
| format | Artículo Open Access |
| id | wiley_oa_10_1002_cpp_70022 |
| institution | Wiley Open Access |
| license_str_mv | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | wiley_oa |
| spellingShingle | Mental Pain Questionnaire: Clinimetric Properties of a Potential Global Person‐Centred Outcome Measure Fiammetta Cosci Danilo Carrozzino Chiara Patierno Sara Romanazzo Carmen Berrocal Alberto Chiarugi Francesco De Cesaris Serena Guiducci Giovanni Mansueto Kaj Sparle Christensen Tom Sensky Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy Mental Pain Questionnaire: Clinimetric Properties of a Potential Global Person‐Centred Outcome Measure Fiammetta Cosci Danilo Carrozzino Chiara Patierno Sara Romanazzo Carmen Berrocal Alberto Chiarugi Francesco De Cesaris Serena Guiducci Giovanni Mansueto Kaj Sparle Christensen Tom Sensky Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy ABSTRACTIntroductionThe Mental Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) was developed using a clinimetric approach to bring together the key features of mental pain into a single, brief, transdiagnostic scale. The present study aims at extending the validation of the MPQ to people from three different clinical settings.MethodsA multicentre, cross‐sectional study on adults diagnosed with migraine (n = 256), systemic sclerosis (n = 219), or mental disorders (n = 138) was conducted. The MPQ was administered; Rasch and Mokken analyses were performed to assess clinimetric validity.ResultsThe overall fit to the Rasch model indicated a misfit, improved by the exclusion of a single item. MPQ showed to be unidimensional. MPQ total score and individual items scalability were optimal except for the same item. The total MPQ score showed an optimal scalability for the systemic sclerosis sample and an acceptable scalability for the migraine and mental disorders samples. Local dependency was found between two pairs of items. Person separation reliability indices (PSI 0.45) showed that the MPQ could not distinguish between groups with different levels of mental pain.ConclusionMental pain has the potential to serve as a truly generic patient‐centred outcome measure. Recommendations are made for revisions of the original MPQ, but these will require testing in further validation studies. 10.1002/cpp.70022 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor |
| title | Mental Pain Questionnaire: Clinimetric Properties of a Potential Global Person‐Centred Outcome Measure |
| topic | Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy |
| url | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.70022 |