Twenty Years of Attachment Research With the Friends and Family Interview: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stefania Muzi, Howard Steele, Cecilia Serena Pace
Format: Artículo Open Access
Published: Wiley 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867003743276367872
author Stefania Muzi
Howard Steele
Cecilia Serena Pace
author_facet Stefania Muzi
Howard Steele
Cecilia Serena Pace
Stefania Muzi
Howard Steele
Cecilia Serena Pace
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Twenty Years of Attachment Research With the Friends and Family Interview: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis Stefania Muzi Howard Steele Cecilia Serena Pace Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy ABSTRACT Objective This systematic review and meta‐analysis assessed the Friends and Family Interview (FFI) as a tool for measuring attachment in middle childhood and adolescence. Methods A comprehensive search was conducted following PRISMA guidelines across Scopus, Web of Sciences, PsycINFO and PubMed, covering literature from 2004 to 2024. Out of 3000 screened records, 52 studies were selected for narrative synthesis and 32 for meta‐analysis. Data extraction used a structured coding protocol and quality was assessed with the Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale. Results The meta‐analysis included 2867 participants, revealing significant study heterogeneity. At‐risk samples ( k  = 13, n  = 598) had a higher prevalence of insecure attachment compared to community samples ( k  = 11, n  = 1080). Clinical samples (three, all with anxiety disorders) mostly showed secure classifications. Cultural differences in attachment were observed between European and Northern American or Latin samples. Attachment disorganization scores correlated positively and significantly with internalizing and thought symptoms, while scores for Security, Insecure‐Dismissing, Coherence, Secure Base/Safe Haven mother and father scores were associated to verbal IQ, with moderating effects of (older) age, (female) gender and sample risk. Conclusions The FFI shows potential as an attachment assessment tool, but issues like study heterogeneity and cultural bias require further research to improve its applicability across diverse populations. 10.1002/cpp.70203 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cpp.70203
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1002_cpp_70203
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
publishDate 2026
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Twenty Years of Attachment Research With the Friends and Family Interview: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
Stefania Muzi
Howard Steele
Cecilia Serena Pace
Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
Twenty Years of Attachment Research With the Friends and Family Interview: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis Stefania Muzi Howard Steele Cecilia Serena Pace Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy ABSTRACT Objective This systematic review and meta‐analysis assessed the Friends and Family Interview (FFI) as a tool for measuring attachment in middle childhood and adolescence. Methods A comprehensive search was conducted following PRISMA guidelines across Scopus, Web of Sciences, PsycINFO and PubMed, covering literature from 2004 to 2024. Out of 3000 screened records, 52 studies were selected for narrative synthesis and 32 for meta‐analysis. Data extraction used a structured coding protocol and quality was assessed with the Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale. Results The meta‐analysis included 2867 participants, revealing significant study heterogeneity. At‐risk samples ( k  = 13, n  = 598) had a higher prevalence of insecure attachment compared to community samples ( k  = 11, n  = 1080). Clinical samples (three, all with anxiety disorders) mostly showed secure classifications. Cultural differences in attachment were observed between European and Northern American or Latin samples. Attachment disorganization scores correlated positively and significantly with internalizing and thought symptoms, while scores for Security, Insecure‐Dismissing, Coherence, Secure Base/Safe Haven mother and father scores were associated to verbal IQ, with moderating effects of (older) age, (female) gender and sample risk. Conclusions The FFI shows potential as an attachment assessment tool, but issues like study heterogeneity and cultural bias require further research to improve its applicability across diverse populations. 10.1002/cpp.70203 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
title Twenty Years of Attachment Research With the Friends and Family Interview: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
topic Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.70203