The Assessment of Metacognition in Psychosis: Systematic Review and Future Lines of Research
Fuente:
Wiley Open Access
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artículo Open Access |
| Published: |
Wiley
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867015690750263296 |
|---|---|
| author | Luciana Díaz‐Cutraro Marina Verdaguer‐Rodriguez Marta Ferrer‐Quintero Roger Montserrat Steffen Moritz Paul Lysaker Giancarlo Dimaggio Carolina Palma‐Sevillano María Lamarca Victoria Espinosa Rabea Fischer Marina Peniza‐Soriano Raquel López‐Carrilero Helena García‐Mieres Susana Ochoa |
| author_facet | Luciana Díaz‐Cutraro Marina Verdaguer‐Rodriguez Marta Ferrer‐Quintero Roger Montserrat Steffen Moritz Paul Lysaker Giancarlo Dimaggio Carolina Palma‐Sevillano María Lamarca Victoria Espinosa Rabea Fischer Marina Peniza‐Soriano Raquel López‐Carrilero Helena García‐Mieres Susana Ochoa Luciana Díaz‐Cutraro Marina Verdaguer‐Rodriguez Marta Ferrer‐Quintero Roger Montserrat Steffen Moritz Paul Lysaker Giancarlo Dimaggio Carolina Palma‐Sevillano María Lamarca Victoria Espinosa Rabea Fischer Marina Peniza‐Soriano Raquel López‐Carrilero Helena García‐Mieres Susana Ochoa |
| collection | Wiley Open Access |
| contents | The Assessment of Metacognition in Psychosis: Systematic Review and Future Lines of Research Luciana Díaz‐Cutraro Marina Verdaguer‐Rodriguez Marta Ferrer‐Quintero Roger Montserrat Steffen Moritz Paul Lysaker Giancarlo Dimaggio Carolina Palma‐Sevillano María Lamarca Victoria Espinosa Rabea Fischer Marina Peniza‐Soriano Raquel López‐Carrilero Helena García‐Mieres Susana Ochoa Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy ABSTRACT Impaired metacognition, the capacity to understand one's own and others' mental states, has gained increasing attention in psychosis research. Different conceptualizations, psychological treatments and assessment methods have emerged; however, there is a lack of consensus regarding the appropriate tools for clinical and research use. This systematic review had two aims: (1) to compile and organize available assessment tools and (2) to propose an index of metacognitive domains and processes. Instruments were categorized according to authorship, year of use in psychosis, outcomes assessed, language/version, administration time and type of Clinical Outcome Assessment (ClinRO, PRO or PerfO). We identified 42 studies that used 31 instruments. The tools were classified into four domains: Metacognitive Awareness, Metacognitive Capacity, Neurometacognition and Social Metacognition. Our findings highlight the diversity of the available measures and propose a framework for aligning instruments with specific reflective processes. This work represents a practical and theoretical first step toward building consensus and facilitating both the use of available tools according to practical needs and the development of an agreed‐upon definition and components of metacognition. 10.1002/cpp.70223 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/cpp.70223 |
| format | Artículo Open Access |
| id | wiley_oa_10_1002_cpp_70223 |
| institution | Wiley Open Access |
| license_str_mv | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | wiley_oa |
| spellingShingle | The Assessment of Metacognition in Psychosis: Systematic Review and Future Lines of Research Luciana Díaz‐Cutraro Marina Verdaguer‐Rodriguez Marta Ferrer‐Quintero Roger Montserrat Steffen Moritz Paul Lysaker Giancarlo Dimaggio Carolina Palma‐Sevillano María Lamarca Victoria Espinosa Rabea Fischer Marina Peniza‐Soriano Raquel López‐Carrilero Helena García‐Mieres Susana Ochoa Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy The Assessment of Metacognition in Psychosis: Systematic Review and Future Lines of Research Luciana Díaz‐Cutraro Marina Verdaguer‐Rodriguez Marta Ferrer‐Quintero Roger Montserrat Steffen Moritz Paul Lysaker Giancarlo Dimaggio Carolina Palma‐Sevillano María Lamarca Victoria Espinosa Rabea Fischer Marina Peniza‐Soriano Raquel López‐Carrilero Helena García‐Mieres Susana Ochoa Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy ABSTRACT Impaired metacognition, the capacity to understand one's own and others' mental states, has gained increasing attention in psychosis research. Different conceptualizations, psychological treatments and assessment methods have emerged; however, there is a lack of consensus regarding the appropriate tools for clinical and research use. This systematic review had two aims: (1) to compile and organize available assessment tools and (2) to propose an index of metacognitive domains and processes. Instruments were categorized according to authorship, year of use in psychosis, outcomes assessed, language/version, administration time and type of Clinical Outcome Assessment (ClinRO, PRO or PerfO). We identified 42 studies that used 31 instruments. The tools were classified into four domains: Metacognitive Awareness, Metacognitive Capacity, Neurometacognition and Social Metacognition. Our findings highlight the diversity of the available measures and propose a framework for aligning instruments with specific reflective processes. This work represents a practical and theoretical first step toward building consensus and facilitating both the use of available tools according to practical needs and the development of an agreed‐upon definition and components of metacognition. 10.1002/cpp.70223 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| title | The Assessment of Metacognition in Psychosis: Systematic Review and Future Lines of Research |
| topic | Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy |
| url | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.70223 |