Metacognitive Beliefs and Symptom Dimensions in OCD: A Network Analysis Identifying Central Nodes and a Severity Predictor

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Saeed Anwar, Romana Younas, Mujahid Iqbal, Jiang Yingjie
Natura: Artículo Open Access
Pubblicazione: Wiley 2026
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1867017129540190208
author Saeed Anwar
Romana Younas
Mujahid Iqbal
Jiang Yingjie
author_facet Saeed Anwar
Romana Younas
Mujahid Iqbal
Jiang Yingjie
Saeed Anwar
Romana Younas
Mujahid Iqbal
Jiang Yingjie
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Metacognitive Beliefs and Symptom Dimensions in OCD: A Network Analysis Identifying Central Nodes and a Severity Predictor Saeed Anwar Romana Younas Mujahid Iqbal Jiang Yingjie Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy ABSTRACT Obsessive‐compulsive disorder (OCD) is a heterogeneous condition characterized by a wide range of symptoms and maladaptive beliefs. However, previous research has often studied these symptoms and metacognitive beliefs in isolation, creating a critical gap in our understanding. To address this, our study used network analysis to uncover the interconnected relationships between these factors in 167 adults with primary OCD. By identifying the most central cognitive nodes, our findings suggest new targets for targeted interventions that could significantly enhance treatment effectiveness. Data were collected from two outpatient clinics in Pakistan. Participants completed measures of OCD symptoms (Yale–Brown Obsessive‐Compulsive Scale; Padua Inventory–Revised) and metacognitive beliefs (Obsessive Beliefs Questionnaire–44; Metacognitions Questionnaire–30). Network analysis revealed two clusters, one for symptoms and one for metacognitive beliefs, indicating distinct yet interconnected domains of OCD pathology. Centrality analyses identified cognitive confidence (CC) and negative beliefs about worry (NBW) as the most central nodes, with strong connections to other nodes. Regression analyses indicated that, contrary to expectations, only positive beliefs about worry (PBW) uniquely predicted OCD severity, whereas CC and NBW did not show unique predictive effects. These findings support targeting central cognitive processes, such as memory confidence and beliefs about the uncontrollability of worry, in the treatment of OCD. Mapping the interplay between symptoms and beliefs within the OCD network may inform the development of targeted interventions and enhance treatment efficacy. 10.1002/cpp.70287 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cpp.70287
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1002_cpp_70287
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
publishDate 2026
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Metacognitive Beliefs and Symptom Dimensions in OCD: A Network Analysis Identifying Central Nodes and a Severity Predictor
Saeed Anwar
Romana Younas
Mujahid Iqbal
Jiang Yingjie
Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
Metacognitive Beliefs and Symptom Dimensions in OCD: A Network Analysis Identifying Central Nodes and a Severity Predictor Saeed Anwar Romana Younas Mujahid Iqbal Jiang Yingjie Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy ABSTRACT Obsessive‐compulsive disorder (OCD) is a heterogeneous condition characterized by a wide range of symptoms and maladaptive beliefs. However, previous research has often studied these symptoms and metacognitive beliefs in isolation, creating a critical gap in our understanding. To address this, our study used network analysis to uncover the interconnected relationships between these factors in 167 adults with primary OCD. By identifying the most central cognitive nodes, our findings suggest new targets for targeted interventions that could significantly enhance treatment effectiveness. Data were collected from two outpatient clinics in Pakistan. Participants completed measures of OCD symptoms (Yale–Brown Obsessive‐Compulsive Scale; Padua Inventory–Revised) and metacognitive beliefs (Obsessive Beliefs Questionnaire–44; Metacognitions Questionnaire–30). Network analysis revealed two clusters, one for symptoms and one for metacognitive beliefs, indicating distinct yet interconnected domains of OCD pathology. Centrality analyses identified cognitive confidence (CC) and negative beliefs about worry (NBW) as the most central nodes, with strong connections to other nodes. Regression analyses indicated that, contrary to expectations, only positive beliefs about worry (PBW) uniquely predicted OCD severity, whereas CC and NBW did not show unique predictive effects. These findings support targeting central cognitive processes, such as memory confidence and beliefs about the uncontrollability of worry, in the treatment of OCD. Mapping the interplay between symptoms and beliefs within the OCD network may inform the development of targeted interventions and enhance treatment efficacy. 10.1002/cpp.70287 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
title Metacognitive Beliefs and Symptom Dimensions in OCD: A Network Analysis Identifying Central Nodes and a Severity Predictor
topic Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.70287