Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salome Vanwoerden, Vera Vine, Amy L. Byrd, Kathryn B. Altman, J. Richard Jennings, Stephanie D. Stepp
Formato: Artículo Open Access
Publicado: Wiley 2026
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dev.70149
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1867003444469956609
author Salome Vanwoerden
Vera Vine
Amy L. Byrd
Kathryn B. Altman
J. Richard Jennings
Stephanie D. Stepp
author_facet Salome Vanwoerden
Vera Vine
Amy L. Byrd
Kathryn B. Altman
J. Richard Jennings
Stephanie D. Stepp
Salome Vanwoerden
Vera Vine
Amy L. Byrd
Kathryn B. Altman
J. Richard Jennings
Stephanie D. Stepp
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Investigating Physiology‐Behavior Associations for Youth During Parent–Child Conflict Discussions Salome Vanwoerden Vera Vine Amy L. Byrd Kathryn B. Altman J. Richard Jennings Stephanie D. Stepp Developmental Psychobiology ABSTRACT Adolescents’ observed affective behavior is associated with patterns of concurrent physiological responding, which explain clinically relevant outcomes. Few studies have elucidated the physiology‐behavior association during the developmentally salient context of conflict with parents. The current study evaluated associations between respiratory sinus arrythmia (RSA) activity and observed youth affective behavior during parent–child conflict. We took a contextually informed approach to address limitations of past research with a clinical sample of parent–child dyads ( N  = 162, M youthage  = 12.03 (0.92) years; 46.9% female; 42% White and non‐Hispanic/Latinx; 40.7% Black; 16.7% multiracial). Dyads completed a conflict discussion during which youths’ affective behaviors were observationally coded. Additionally, we measured youths’ RSA and subjective affect as well as parents’ negative behavior. Youths’ angry/defiant behavior was predicted by faster RSA withdrawal, increases in subjective negative affect, and more negative parent behavior, whereas youths’ sad/distressed and positive engagement behaviors were predicted solely by subjective negative affect and negative parent behavior, respectively. Findings underscore the importance of taking context into account to understand the physiology‐behavior association among youth in developmentally salient interactions, which has implications for enhancing etiological models of psychopathology. 10.1002/dev.70149 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
doi_str_mv 10.1002/dev.70149
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1002_dev_70149
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
publishDate 2026
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Investigating Physiology‐Behavior Associations for Youth During Parent–Child Conflict Discussions
Salome Vanwoerden
Vera Vine
Amy L. Byrd
Kathryn B. Altman
J. Richard Jennings
Stephanie D. Stepp
Developmental Psychobiology
Investigating Physiology‐Behavior Associations for Youth During Parent–Child Conflict Discussions Salome Vanwoerden Vera Vine Amy L. Byrd Kathryn B. Altman J. Richard Jennings Stephanie D. Stepp Developmental Psychobiology ABSTRACT Adolescents’ observed affective behavior is associated with patterns of concurrent physiological responding, which explain clinically relevant outcomes. Few studies have elucidated the physiology‐behavior association during the developmentally salient context of conflict with parents. The current study evaluated associations between respiratory sinus arrythmia (RSA) activity and observed youth affective behavior during parent–child conflict. We took a contextually informed approach to address limitations of past research with a clinical sample of parent–child dyads ( N  = 162, M youthage  = 12.03 (0.92) years; 46.9% female; 42% White and non‐Hispanic/Latinx; 40.7% Black; 16.7% multiracial). Dyads completed a conflict discussion during which youths’ affective behaviors were observationally coded. Additionally, we measured youths’ RSA and subjective affect as well as parents’ negative behavior. Youths’ angry/defiant behavior was predicted by faster RSA withdrawal, increases in subjective negative affect, and more negative parent behavior, whereas youths’ sad/distressed and positive engagement behaviors were predicted solely by subjective negative affect and negative parent behavior, respectively. Findings underscore the importance of taking context into account to understand the physiology‐behavior association among youth in developmentally salient interactions, which has implications for enhancing etiological models of psychopathology. 10.1002/dev.70149 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
title Investigating Physiology‐Behavior Associations for Youth During Parent–Child Conflict Discussions
topic Developmental Psychobiology
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dev.70149