Federal court clarifies A.J.T . holding, limits of failure to accommodate claims

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Eric Lyerly
Format: Artículo Open Access
Veröffentlicht: Wiley 2025
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1867007945545351168
author Eric Lyerly
author_facet Eric Lyerly
Eric Lyerly
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Federal court clarifies A.J.T . holding, limits of failure to accommodate claims Eric Lyerly Disability Compliance for Higher Education In the June 2025 case A.J.T. v. Osseo Area Schools , the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously rejected the “bad faith or gross misjudgment” standard that several lower courts had been applying to disability discrimination claims brought under Title II of the ADA and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act in the education context. The Court held that disability discrimination claims against public schools and educational institutions should be evaluated under the ordinary ADA/Rehabilitation Act framework, not a heightened one requiring proof of bad faith or gross misjudgment. Essentially, the Court clarified that plaintiffs do not need to show extreme misconduct or ill intent by an institution to have a successful discrimination claim. 10.1002/dhe.32090 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
doi_str_mv 10.1002/dhe.32090
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1002_dhe_32090
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
publishDate 2025
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Federal court clarifies A.J.T . holding, limits of failure to accommodate claims
Eric Lyerly
Disability Compliance for Higher Education
Federal court clarifies A.J.T . holding, limits of failure to accommodate claims Eric Lyerly Disability Compliance for Higher Education In the June 2025 case A.J.T. v. Osseo Area Schools , the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously rejected the “bad faith or gross misjudgment” standard that several lower courts had been applying to disability discrimination claims brought under Title II of the ADA and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act in the education context. The Court held that disability discrimination claims against public schools and educational institutions should be evaluated under the ordinary ADA/Rehabilitation Act framework, not a heightened one requiring proof of bad faith or gross misjudgment. Essentially, the Court clarified that plaintiffs do not need to show extreme misconduct or ill intent by an institution to have a successful discrimination claim. 10.1002/dhe.32090 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
title Federal court clarifies A.J.T . holding, limits of failure to accommodate claims
topic Disability Compliance for Higher Education
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dhe.32090