Enhancing Self‐Efficacy for Engagement With Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Initiatives: Evaluation of a Seven‐Day Immersive Pilot Program in a College of Education, Health, and Human Sciences

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Jennifer M. Jabson Tree, Stefanie Benjamin, Dorian L. McCoy
Format: Artículo Open Access
Publié: Wiley 2025
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1867010661063589888
author Jennifer M. Jabson Tree
Stefanie Benjamin
Dorian L. McCoy
author_facet Jennifer M. Jabson Tree
Stefanie Benjamin
Dorian L. McCoy
Jennifer M. Jabson Tree
Stefanie Benjamin
Dorian L. McCoy
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Enhancing Self‐Efficacy for Engagement With Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Initiatives: Evaluation of a Seven‐Day Immersive Pilot Program in a College of Education, Health, and Human Sciences Jennifer M. Jabson Tree Stefanie Benjamin Dorian L. McCoy Diversity & Inclusion Research ABSTRACTColleges of health, human sciences, and education are often administratively organized to include a diverse array of human sciences departments that share roots in social justice and a commitment to advancing equity and inclusion. Despite espoused commitments to equity and inclusion, they frequently struggle to achieve the changes necessary for advancing equity, and inclusion principles across policies, practices, procedures, and units. We implemented and evaluated a 7‐day, total immersion, 56‐h, educational program entitled the “Social Justice Institute” (SJI) for two cohorts of faculty, staff, and administrators to develop self‐efficacy to intervene in systemic oppression in their academic units. SJI delivered focused content and exercises on structural oppression. A one‐group, pre‐, and post‐survey no comparison process evaluation design was used to estimate the change in participants' quantitative self‐efficacy. Cohort 1 included 14 and Cohort 2 included 15 participants (N = 29). Before attending SJI, participants' average self‐efficacy score was 5.84 (SD = 0.76; Cohort 1) and 5.83 (SD = 0.37; Cohort 2), respectively. After attending the SJI, the self‐efficacy average increased to 6.49 (SD = 1.19) and 6.46 (SD = 0.18) respectively. This is a 9%–10% average improvement in self‐efficacy each year. Each cohort rated the quality of the SJI. Day 2 had the highest quality rating (mean = 4.75, SD = 0.45) (topic: sex, gender, sexism, and cissexism), with Day 3 receiving the lowest quality rating (mean = 3.75, SD = 0.97) (topic: race, racism, and whiteness). This evaluation provides preliminary evidence that an SJI may be one possible contribution to advancing self‐efficacy for intervening in bias in higher education. Rigorous educational programs and evaluations must be implemented and conducted to advance strategies that support inclusion and diversity in higher education. 10.1002/dvr2.70021 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
doi_str_mv 10.1002/dvr2.70021
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1002_dvr2_70021
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
publishDate 2025
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Enhancing Self‐Efficacy for Engagement With Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Initiatives: Evaluation of a Seven‐Day Immersive Pilot Program in a College of Education, Health, and Human Sciences
Jennifer M. Jabson Tree
Stefanie Benjamin
Dorian L. McCoy
Diversity & Inclusion Research
Enhancing Self‐Efficacy for Engagement With Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Initiatives: Evaluation of a Seven‐Day Immersive Pilot Program in a College of Education, Health, and Human Sciences Jennifer M. Jabson Tree Stefanie Benjamin Dorian L. McCoy Diversity & Inclusion Research ABSTRACTColleges of health, human sciences, and education are often administratively organized to include a diverse array of human sciences departments that share roots in social justice and a commitment to advancing equity and inclusion. Despite espoused commitments to equity and inclusion, they frequently struggle to achieve the changes necessary for advancing equity, and inclusion principles across policies, practices, procedures, and units. We implemented and evaluated a 7‐day, total immersion, 56‐h, educational program entitled the “Social Justice Institute” (SJI) for two cohorts of faculty, staff, and administrators to develop self‐efficacy to intervene in systemic oppression in their academic units. SJI delivered focused content and exercises on structural oppression. A one‐group, pre‐, and post‐survey no comparison process evaluation design was used to estimate the change in participants' quantitative self‐efficacy. Cohort 1 included 14 and Cohort 2 included 15 participants (N = 29). Before attending SJI, participants' average self‐efficacy score was 5.84 (SD = 0.76; Cohort 1) and 5.83 (SD = 0.37; Cohort 2), respectively. After attending the SJI, the self‐efficacy average increased to 6.49 (SD = 1.19) and 6.46 (SD = 0.18) respectively. This is a 9%–10% average improvement in self‐efficacy each year. Each cohort rated the quality of the SJI. Day 2 had the highest quality rating (mean = 4.75, SD = 0.45) (topic: sex, gender, sexism, and cissexism), with Day 3 receiving the lowest quality rating (mean = 3.75, SD = 0.97) (topic: race, racism, and whiteness). This evaluation provides preliminary evidence that an SJI may be one possible contribution to advancing self‐efficacy for intervening in bias in higher education. Rigorous educational programs and evaluations must be implemented and conducted to advance strategies that support inclusion and diversity in higher education. 10.1002/dvr2.70021 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
title Enhancing Self‐Efficacy for Engagement With Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Initiatives: Evaluation of a Seven‐Day Immersive Pilot Program in a College of Education, Health, and Human Sciences
topic Diversity & Inclusion Research
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dvr2.70021