Real‐world glycaemic outcomes in patients with type 1 diabetes using glucose sensors—Experience from a single centre in Dublin

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Robert E. Lyons, Roshaida Abdul Wahab, Sue Yee Goh, Cathy Breen, Amanda Rhynehart, Mary O'Scannail, Hannah Jade Kelly, Karl Neff, Donal O'Shea, Ronan Canavan, Wan Aizad Wan Mahmood
Natura: Artículo Open Access
Pubblicazione: Wiley 2024
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1867016545511669760
author Robert E. Lyons
Roshaida Abdul Wahab
Sue Yee Goh
Cathy Breen
Amanda Rhynehart
Mary O'Scannail
Hannah Jade Kelly
Karl Neff
Donal O'Shea
Ronan Canavan
Wan Aizad Wan Mahmood
author_facet Robert E. Lyons
Roshaida Abdul Wahab
Sue Yee Goh
Cathy Breen
Amanda Rhynehart
Mary O'Scannail
Hannah Jade Kelly
Karl Neff
Donal O'Shea
Ronan Canavan
Wan Aizad Wan Mahmood
Robert E. Lyons
Roshaida Abdul Wahab
Sue Yee Goh
Cathy Breen
Amanda Rhynehart
Mary O'Scannail
Hannah Jade Kelly
Karl Neff
Donal O'Shea
Ronan Canavan
Wan Aizad Wan Mahmood
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Real‐world glycaemic outcomes in patients with type 1 diabetes using glucose sensors—Experience from a single centre in Dublin Robert E. Lyons Roshaida Abdul Wahab Sue Yee Goh Cathy Breen Amanda Rhynehart Mary O'Scannail Hannah Jade Kelly Karl Neff Donal O'Shea Ronan Canavan Wan Aizad Wan Mahmood Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism AbstractAimsTo evaluate changes in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and sensor‐based glycaemic metrics after glucose sensor commencement in adults with T1D.MethodsWe performed a retrospective observational single‐centre study on HbA1c, and sensor‐based glycaemic data following the initiation of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in adults with T1D (n = 209).ResultsWe observed an overall improvement in HbA1c from 66 (59–78) mmol/mol [8.2 (7.5–9.3)%] pre‐sensor to 60 (53–71) mmol/mol [7.6 (7.0–8.6)%] on‐sensor (p < .001). The pre‐sensor HbA1c improved from 66 (57–74) mmol/mol [8.2 (7.4–8.9)%] to 62 (54–71) mmol/mol [7.8 (7.1–8.7)%] within the first year of usage to 60 (53–69) mmol/mol [7.6 (7.0–8.4)%] in the following year (n = 121, p < .001). RT‐CGM‐user had a significant improvement in HbA1c (Dexcom G6; p < .001, r = 0.33 and Guardian 3; p < .001, r = 0.59) while a non‐significant reduction was seen in FGM‐user (Libre 1; p = .279). Both MDI (p < .001, r = 0.33) and CSII group (p < .001, r = 0.41) also demonstrated significant HbA1c improvement. Patients with pre‐sensor HbA1c of ≥64 mmol/mol [8.0%] (n = 125), had attenuation of pre‐sensor HbA1c from 75 (68–83) mmol/mol [9.0 (8.4–9.7)%] to 67 (59–75) mmol/mol [8.2 (7.6–9.0)%] (p < .001, r = 0.44). Altogether, 25.8% of patients achieved the recommended HbA1c goal of ≤53 mmol/mol and 16.7% attained the recommended ≥70% time in range (3.9–10.0 mmol/L).ConclusionsOur study demonstrated that minimally invasive glucose sensor technology in adults with T1D is associated with improvement in glycaemic outcomes. However, despite significant improvements in HbA1c, achieving the recommended goals for all glycaemic metrics remained challenging. 10.1002/edm2.469 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
doi_str_mv 10.1002/edm2.469
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1002_edm2_469
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
publishDate 2024
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Real‐world glycaemic outcomes in patients with type 1 diabetes using glucose sensors—Experience from a single centre in Dublin
Robert E. Lyons
Roshaida Abdul Wahab
Sue Yee Goh
Cathy Breen
Amanda Rhynehart
Mary O'Scannail
Hannah Jade Kelly
Karl Neff
Donal O'Shea
Ronan Canavan
Wan Aizad Wan Mahmood
Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism
Real‐world glycaemic outcomes in patients with type 1 diabetes using glucose sensors—Experience from a single centre in Dublin Robert E. Lyons Roshaida Abdul Wahab Sue Yee Goh Cathy Breen Amanda Rhynehart Mary O'Scannail Hannah Jade Kelly Karl Neff Donal O'Shea Ronan Canavan Wan Aizad Wan Mahmood Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism AbstractAimsTo evaluate changes in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and sensor‐based glycaemic metrics after glucose sensor commencement in adults with T1D.MethodsWe performed a retrospective observational single‐centre study on HbA1c, and sensor‐based glycaemic data following the initiation of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in adults with T1D (n = 209).ResultsWe observed an overall improvement in HbA1c from 66 (59–78) mmol/mol [8.2 (7.5–9.3)%] pre‐sensor to 60 (53–71) mmol/mol [7.6 (7.0–8.6)%] on‐sensor (p < .001). The pre‐sensor HbA1c improved from 66 (57–74) mmol/mol [8.2 (7.4–8.9)%] to 62 (54–71) mmol/mol [7.8 (7.1–8.7)%] within the first year of usage to 60 (53–69) mmol/mol [7.6 (7.0–8.4)%] in the following year (n = 121, p < .001). RT‐CGM‐user had a significant improvement in HbA1c (Dexcom G6; p < .001, r = 0.33 and Guardian 3; p < .001, r = 0.59) while a non‐significant reduction was seen in FGM‐user (Libre 1; p = .279). Both MDI (p < .001, r = 0.33) and CSII group (p < .001, r = 0.41) also demonstrated significant HbA1c improvement. Patients with pre‐sensor HbA1c of ≥64 mmol/mol [8.0%] (n = 125), had attenuation of pre‐sensor HbA1c from 75 (68–83) mmol/mol [9.0 (8.4–9.7)%] to 67 (59–75) mmol/mol [8.2 (7.6–9.0)%] (p < .001, r = 0.44). Altogether, 25.8% of patients achieved the recommended HbA1c goal of ≤53 mmol/mol and 16.7% attained the recommended ≥70% time in range (3.9–10.0 mmol/L).ConclusionsOur study demonstrated that minimally invasive glucose sensor technology in adults with T1D is associated with improvement in glycaemic outcomes. However, despite significant improvements in HbA1c, achieving the recommended goals for all glycaemic metrics remained challenging. 10.1002/edm2.469 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
title Real‐world glycaemic outcomes in patients with type 1 diabetes using glucose sensors—Experience from a single centre in Dublin
topic Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edm2.469