Non‐linear time history analyses of a rigid block isolated with unbonded fiber‐reinforced elastomeric isolators (UFREIs): A comparison between 3D finite element and phenomenological models
Fuente:
Wiley Open Access
Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Artículo Open Access |
| Pubblicazione: |
Wiley
2024
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1867013539193946113 |
|---|---|
| author | Hediyeh Sheikh Gaetano Pianese Rajeev Ruparathna Niel C. Van Engelen Gabriele Milani |
| author_facet | Hediyeh Sheikh Gaetano Pianese Rajeev Ruparathna Niel C. Van Engelen Gabriele Milani Hediyeh Sheikh Gaetano Pianese Rajeev Ruparathna Niel C. Van Engelen Gabriele Milani |
| collection | Wiley Open Access |
| contents | Non‐linear time history analyses of a rigid block isolated with unbonded fiber‐reinforced elastomeric isolators (UFREIs): A comparison between 3D finite element and phenomenological models Hediyeh Sheikh Gaetano Pianese Rajeev Ruparathna Niel C. Van Engelen Gabriele Milani Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics AbstractNumerical modeling represents a pivotal tool in the seismic analysis and design of structural systems, enabling the detailed prediction and examination of structural responses under seismic loading. This research conducts a comparative analysis of two numerical modeling approaches aimed at simulating the seismic response of unbonded fiber‐reinforced elastomeric isolators (UFREIs). The research focuses on a finite element (FE) model developed using Abaqus and a developed phenomenological model implemented in OpenSees, outlining the development and calibration processes for each. The FE model is developed based on simple rubber material testing data, while the phenomenological model is calibrated using experimental results from cyclic shear tests conducted on the UFREI device and the FE model. The primary objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of these modeling approaches in predicting UFREI behavior under seismic conditions. This evaluation entails comparing model predictions with experimental data obtained from unidirectional shake table tests performed on a rigid block isolated by two UFREIs. This paper highlights the distinct advantages and limitations of each model in simulating UFREI dynamic responses during seismic events. Furthermore, it provides insights into the modeling techniques and discusses the computational demands and data requirements of each model, thereby aiding in their application to various aspects of seismic analysis and design. 10.1002/eqe.4263 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/eqe.4263 |
| format | Artículo Open Access |
| id | wiley_oa_10_1002_eqe_4263 |
| institution | Wiley Open Access |
| license_str_mv | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | wiley_oa |
| spellingShingle | Non‐linear time history analyses of a rigid block isolated with unbonded fiber‐reinforced elastomeric isolators (UFREIs): A comparison between 3D finite element and phenomenological models Hediyeh Sheikh Gaetano Pianese Rajeev Ruparathna Niel C. Van Engelen Gabriele Milani Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics Non‐linear time history analyses of a rigid block isolated with unbonded fiber‐reinforced elastomeric isolators (UFREIs): A comparison between 3D finite element and phenomenological models Hediyeh Sheikh Gaetano Pianese Rajeev Ruparathna Niel C. Van Engelen Gabriele Milani Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics AbstractNumerical modeling represents a pivotal tool in the seismic analysis and design of structural systems, enabling the detailed prediction and examination of structural responses under seismic loading. This research conducts a comparative analysis of two numerical modeling approaches aimed at simulating the seismic response of unbonded fiber‐reinforced elastomeric isolators (UFREIs). The research focuses on a finite element (FE) model developed using Abaqus and a developed phenomenological model implemented in OpenSees, outlining the development and calibration processes for each. The FE model is developed based on simple rubber material testing data, while the phenomenological model is calibrated using experimental results from cyclic shear tests conducted on the UFREI device and the FE model. The primary objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of these modeling approaches in predicting UFREI behavior under seismic conditions. This evaluation entails comparing model predictions with experimental data obtained from unidirectional shake table tests performed on a rigid block isolated by two UFREIs. This paper highlights the distinct advantages and limitations of each model in simulating UFREI dynamic responses during seismic events. Furthermore, it provides insights into the modeling techniques and discusses the computational demands and data requirements of each model, thereby aiding in their application to various aspects of seismic analysis and design. 10.1002/eqe.4263 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
| title | Non‐linear time history analyses of a rigid block isolated with unbonded fiber‐reinforced elastomeric isolators (UFREIs): A comparison between 3D finite element and phenomenological models |
| topic | Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics |
| url | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eqe.4263 |