Some hope for a dimensional assessment? A critical review of psychometric validated (semi‐)structured interview to assess eating disorders
Fuente:
Wiley Open Access
Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Artículo Open Access |
| Pubblicazione: |
Wiley
2024
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1867019938358624256 |
|---|---|
| author | Lola Tournayre Marcos Alencar Abaide Balbinotti Johana Monthuy‐Blanc |
| author_facet | Lola Tournayre Marcos Alencar Abaide Balbinotti Johana Monthuy‐Blanc Lola Tournayre Marcos Alencar Abaide Balbinotti Johana Monthuy‐Blanc |
| collection | Wiley Open Access |
| contents | Some hope for a dimensional assessment? A critical review of psychometric validated (semi‐)structured interview to assess eating disorders Lola Tournayre Marcos Alencar Abaide Balbinotti Johana Monthuy‐Blanc European Eating Disorders Review AbstractObjectiveGiven that eating disorders (EDs) are considered one of the deadliest mental illnesses, the development of appropriate assessment instruments is a necessity. Despite the extensive literature on assessing EDs, there has been a lack of focus on semi‐structured interviews. The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive review of psychometrically validated semi‐structured interviews for EDs.MethodsIncluded studies (N = 24) were required to present a semi‐structured interview for EDs that has been validated through a psychometric process. The APA PsycNet, MEDLINE, APA Psycinfo, Pubmed, and Health & Psychosocial Instruments databases were searched. The literature search included publications through May 2024, with no earliest year restriction.ResultsA total of six instruments were identified and reviewed in terms of conceptual design, purpose and content, psychometric characteristics, and strengths and limitations. Three main findings were highlighted: (a) only half of the instruments are up to date; (b) the instruments are based on either a categorical or a mixed categorical‐dimensional approach; and (c) the predominance of the categorical approach.ConclusionsThe results are discussed regarding the conceptual approaches of the instrument to provide clinical and research implications. Despite the many strengths of the instrument, additional psychometric research is needed. 10.1002/erv.3115 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/erv.3115 |
| format | Artículo Open Access |
| id | wiley_oa_10_1002_erv_3115 |
| institution | Wiley Open Access |
| license_str_mv | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | wiley_oa |
| spellingShingle | Some hope for a dimensional assessment? A critical review of psychometric validated (semi‐)structured interview to assess eating disorders Lola Tournayre Marcos Alencar Abaide Balbinotti Johana Monthuy‐Blanc European Eating Disorders Review Some hope for a dimensional assessment? A critical review of psychometric validated (semi‐)structured interview to assess eating disorders Lola Tournayre Marcos Alencar Abaide Balbinotti Johana Monthuy‐Blanc European Eating Disorders Review AbstractObjectiveGiven that eating disorders (EDs) are considered one of the deadliest mental illnesses, the development of appropriate assessment instruments is a necessity. Despite the extensive literature on assessing EDs, there has been a lack of focus on semi‐structured interviews. The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive review of psychometrically validated semi‐structured interviews for EDs.MethodsIncluded studies (N = 24) were required to present a semi‐structured interview for EDs that has been validated through a psychometric process. The APA PsycNet, MEDLINE, APA Psycinfo, Pubmed, and Health & Psychosocial Instruments databases were searched. The literature search included publications through May 2024, with no earliest year restriction.ResultsA total of six instruments were identified and reviewed in terms of conceptual design, purpose and content, psychometric characteristics, and strengths and limitations. Three main findings were highlighted: (a) only half of the instruments are up to date; (b) the instruments are based on either a categorical or a mixed categorical‐dimensional approach; and (c) the predominance of the categorical approach.ConclusionsThe results are discussed regarding the conceptual approaches of the instrument to provide clinical and research implications. Despite the many strengths of the instrument, additional psychometric research is needed. 10.1002/erv.3115 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
| title | Some hope for a dimensional assessment? A critical review of psychometric validated (semi‐)structured interview to assess eating disorders |
| topic | European Eating Disorders Review |
| url | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/erv.3115 |