Identifying Faults in Power Transformers Based on Machine‐Learning Algorithms Compared With Other Techniques

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Osama E. Gouda, Nourhan Ramadan, Matti Lehtonen, Mohamed M. F. Darwish
Format: Artículo Open Access
Published: Wiley 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867007468994822144
author Osama E. Gouda
Nourhan Ramadan
Matti Lehtonen
Mohamed M. F. Darwish
author_facet Osama E. Gouda
Nourhan Ramadan
Matti Lehtonen
Mohamed M. F. Darwish
Osama E. Gouda
Nourhan Ramadan
Matti Lehtonen
Mohamed M. F. Darwish
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Identifying Faults in Power Transformers Based on Machine‐Learning Algorithms Compared With Other Techniques Osama E. Gouda Nourhan Ramadan Matti Lehtonen Mohamed M. F. Darwish Energy Science & Engineering ABSTRACT This paper implemented a comprehensive variety of modern machine‐learning techniques, which were demonstrated to be effective in handling complex tabular data, generating accurate predictions, and ensuring high dependability in fault classification of oil‐immersed power transformers. The primary objective of utilizing the techniques is to improve computing efficiency and generalization by using neural networks, gradient boosting models, and hybrid ensemble techniques. Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM) was selected due to its rapidity and memory efficiency algorithms, integrating histogram‐based learning and leafwise growth strategies to allow the effective handling of large‐scale data sets. In parallel, Categorical Boosting was implemented because of its powerful ability to manage categorical data through adaptive categorical encoding and ordered boosting. These methods contribute to mitigating biases and overfitting. According to study comparisons, LGBM performs more accurately than several other boosting algorithms in a variety of real‐life situations. Additionally, a Multilayer Perceptron was applied to capture complex nonlinear interactions that tree‐based models frequently miss. On the basis of utilizing 700 samples reported by the International Technical Committee 10, Central Chemical Laboratories at Egyptian Electricity Holding Company, and related databases, it is concluded that the hybrid LGBM + Extra Trees Classifier model achieved the best performance, with accuracy values ranging between 93% and 98%. Furthermore, the accuracy of the hybrid LGBM + ET has been compared with the accuracy of different conventional and artificial intelligence techniques and has proven to be more accurate. 10.1002/ese3.70521 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ese3.70521
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1002_ese3_70521
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
publishDate 2026
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Identifying Faults in Power Transformers Based on Machine‐Learning Algorithms Compared With Other Techniques
Osama E. Gouda
Nourhan Ramadan
Matti Lehtonen
Mohamed M. F. Darwish
Energy Science & Engineering
Identifying Faults in Power Transformers Based on Machine‐Learning Algorithms Compared With Other Techniques Osama E. Gouda Nourhan Ramadan Matti Lehtonen Mohamed M. F. Darwish Energy Science & Engineering ABSTRACT This paper implemented a comprehensive variety of modern machine‐learning techniques, which were demonstrated to be effective in handling complex tabular data, generating accurate predictions, and ensuring high dependability in fault classification of oil‐immersed power transformers. The primary objective of utilizing the techniques is to improve computing efficiency and generalization by using neural networks, gradient boosting models, and hybrid ensemble techniques. Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM) was selected due to its rapidity and memory efficiency algorithms, integrating histogram‐based learning and leafwise growth strategies to allow the effective handling of large‐scale data sets. In parallel, Categorical Boosting was implemented because of its powerful ability to manage categorical data through adaptive categorical encoding and ordered boosting. These methods contribute to mitigating biases and overfitting. According to study comparisons, LGBM performs more accurately than several other boosting algorithms in a variety of real‐life situations. Additionally, a Multilayer Perceptron was applied to capture complex nonlinear interactions that tree‐based models frequently miss. On the basis of utilizing 700 samples reported by the International Technical Committee 10, Central Chemical Laboratories at Egyptian Electricity Holding Company, and related databases, it is concluded that the hybrid LGBM + Extra Trees Classifier model achieved the best performance, with accuracy values ranging between 93% and 98%. Furthermore, the accuracy of the hybrid LGBM + ET has been compared with the accuracy of different conventional and artificial intelligence techniques and has proven to be more accurate. 10.1002/ese3.70521 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
title Identifying Faults in Power Transformers Based on Machine‐Learning Algorithms Compared With Other Techniques
topic Energy Science & Engineering
url https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.70521