Reporting ethical approval in case reports and case series in 12 consecutive years: A systematic review
Fuente:
Wiley Open Access
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artículo Open Access |
| Published: |
Wiley
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867008288663535616 |
|---|---|
| author | Linh Tran Vuong Thanh Huan Luu Lam Thang Tai Adnan Safi Moustafa ElBadry Ahmed Mohamed Osman Algazar Sedighe Karimzadeh Nguyen Vinh Khang Nguyen Hai Nam Zaheer Ahmad Qureshi Nguyen Lam Vuong Le Huu Nhat Minh Nguyen Tien Huy |
| author_facet | Linh Tran Vuong Thanh Huan Luu Lam Thang Tai Adnan Safi Moustafa ElBadry Ahmed Mohamed Osman Algazar Sedighe Karimzadeh Nguyen Vinh Khang Nguyen Hai Nam Zaheer Ahmad Qureshi Nguyen Lam Vuong Le Huu Nhat Minh Nguyen Tien Huy Linh Tran Vuong Thanh Huan Luu Lam Thang Tai Adnan Safi Moustafa ElBadry Ahmed Mohamed Osman Algazar Sedighe Karimzadeh Nguyen Vinh Khang Nguyen Hai Nam Zaheer Ahmad Qureshi Nguyen Lam Vuong Le Huu Nhat Minh Nguyen Tien Huy |
| collection | Wiley Open Access |
| contents | Reporting ethical approval in case reports and case series in 12 consecutive years: A systematic review Linh Tran Vuong Thanh Huan Luu Lam Thang Tai Adnan Safi Moustafa ElBadry Ahmed Mohamed Osman Algazar Sedighe Karimzadeh Nguyen Vinh Khang Nguyen Hai Nam Zaheer Ahmad Qureshi Nguyen Lam Vuong Le Huu Nhat Minh Nguyen Tien Huy Health Care Science AbstractOur study describes the reported rate of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, declaration of Helsinki (DoH), and informed consent in the case reports and case series and investigates factors associated with the ethical approval report. We searched PubMed for case reports and case series from 2006 to 2017. Annually, we obtained the first 20 articles of a case report cluster from 20 distinct publications. This analysis initially contained at least 2400 papers, with 100 papers each study design and year. Only 26 (5.4%) of 480 included studies reported IRB approval, DoH approval, and participant informed consent; 58 (12.1%) reported two out of three ethical statements (DoH, informed consent, IRB); and 151 (31.5%) reported only one, leading to nearly 245 studies (51.0%) did not report any ethical approval item. Both clusters mentioned the DoH the least. Only years, ages, ethical item types, and cluster types were associated with ethical reporting practices. This study found the serious under‐reporting of ethical practices in both case reports and case series. 10.1002/hcs2.113 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/hcs2.113 |
| format | Artículo Open Access |
| id | wiley_oa_10_1002_hcs2_113 |
| institution | Wiley Open Access |
| license_str_mv | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | wiley_oa |
| spellingShingle | Reporting ethical approval in case reports and case series in 12 consecutive years: A systematic review Linh Tran Vuong Thanh Huan Luu Lam Thang Tai Adnan Safi Moustafa ElBadry Ahmed Mohamed Osman Algazar Sedighe Karimzadeh Nguyen Vinh Khang Nguyen Hai Nam Zaheer Ahmad Qureshi Nguyen Lam Vuong Le Huu Nhat Minh Nguyen Tien Huy Health Care Science Reporting ethical approval in case reports and case series in 12 consecutive years: A systematic review Linh Tran Vuong Thanh Huan Luu Lam Thang Tai Adnan Safi Moustafa ElBadry Ahmed Mohamed Osman Algazar Sedighe Karimzadeh Nguyen Vinh Khang Nguyen Hai Nam Zaheer Ahmad Qureshi Nguyen Lam Vuong Le Huu Nhat Minh Nguyen Tien Huy Health Care Science AbstractOur study describes the reported rate of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, declaration of Helsinki (DoH), and informed consent in the case reports and case series and investigates factors associated with the ethical approval report. We searched PubMed for case reports and case series from 2006 to 2017. Annually, we obtained the first 20 articles of a case report cluster from 20 distinct publications. This analysis initially contained at least 2400 papers, with 100 papers each study design and year. Only 26 (5.4%) of 480 included studies reported IRB approval, DoH approval, and participant informed consent; 58 (12.1%) reported two out of three ethical statements (DoH, informed consent, IRB); and 151 (31.5%) reported only one, leading to nearly 245 studies (51.0%) did not report any ethical approval item. Both clusters mentioned the DoH the least. Only years, ages, ethical item types, and cluster types were associated with ethical reporting practices. This study found the serious under‐reporting of ethical practices in both case reports and case series. 10.1002/hcs2.113 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| title | Reporting ethical approval in case reports and case series in 12 consecutive years: A systematic review |
| topic | Health Care Science |
| url | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hcs2.113 |