Safety of the use of dinoprostone gel and vaginal insert for induction of labor: A multicenter retrospective cohort study

Documenti analoghi

• Comparison of the sequential use of mifepristone and dinoprostone vaginal insert with dinoprostone vaginal insert as the only method for induction of labor in very unripe cervix: a secondary analysis of a multicenter real‐word evidence study
  di: Oleg R. Baev, et al.
  Pubblicazione: (2025)
• Oxytocin and vaginal dinoprostone in labor induction: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
  di: Ting‐An Chang, et al.
  Pubblicazione: (2024)
• Retracted: Safety and efficacy of titrated oral misoprostol solution versus vaginal dinoprostone for induction of labor: A single‐center randomized control trial
  Pubblicazione: (2024)
• Cervical ripening balloon compared with vaginal dinoprostone for cervical ripening in obese women at term: A prospective cohort study
  di: Guillaume Ducarme, et al.
  Pubblicazione: (2024)
• Oral misoprostol ( PGE1 ) vs vaginal dinoprostone ( PGE2 ) for labor induction: individual participant data meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
  di: S. Y. Tan, et al.
  Pubblicazione: (2025)