Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Jinghong Chen, Lingxuan Zhu, Weiming Mou, Anqi Lin, Dongqiang Zeng, Chang Qi, Zaoqu Liu, Aimin Jiang, Bufu Tang, Wenjie Shi, Ulf D. Kahlert, Jianguo Zhou, Shipeng Guo, Xiaofan Lu, Xu Sun, Trunghieu Ngo, Zhongji Pu, Baolei Jia, Che Ok Jeon, Yongbin He, Haiyang Wu, Shuqin Gu, Wisit Cheungpasitporn, Haojie Huang, Weipu Mao, Shixiang Wang, Xin Chen, Loïc Cabannes, Gerald Sng Gui Ren, Iain S. Whitaker, Stephen Ali, Quan Cheng, Kai Miao, Shuofeng Yuan, Peng Luo
Format: Artículo Open Access
Veröffentlicht: Wiley 2024
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/imo2.7
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1867014560674742272
author Jinghong Chen
Lingxuan Zhu
Weiming Mou
Anqi Lin
Dongqiang Zeng
Chang Qi
Zaoqu Liu
Aimin Jiang
Bufu Tang
Wenjie Shi
Ulf D. Kahlert
Jianguo Zhou
Shipeng Guo
Xiaofan Lu
Xu Sun
Trunghieu Ngo
Zhongji Pu
Baolei Jia
Che Ok Jeon
Yongbin He
Haiyang Wu
Shuqin Gu
Wisit Cheungpasitporn
Haojie Huang
Weipu Mao
Shixiang Wang
Xin Chen
Loïc Cabannes
Gerald Sng Gui Ren
Iain S. Whitaker
Stephen Ali
Quan Cheng
Kai Miao
Shuofeng Yuan
Peng Luo
author_facet Jinghong Chen
Lingxuan Zhu
Weiming Mou
Anqi Lin
Dongqiang Zeng
Chang Qi
Zaoqu Liu
Aimin Jiang
Bufu Tang
Wenjie Shi
Ulf D. Kahlert
Jianguo Zhou
Shipeng Guo
Xiaofan Lu
Xu Sun
Trunghieu Ngo
Zhongji Pu
Baolei Jia
Che Ok Jeon
Yongbin He
Haiyang Wu
Shuqin Gu
Wisit Cheungpasitporn
Haojie Huang
Weipu Mao
Shixiang Wang
Xin Chen
Loïc Cabannes
Gerald Sng Gui Ren
Iain S. Whitaker
Stephen Ali
Quan Cheng
Kai Miao
Shuofeng Yuan
Peng Luo
Jinghong Chen
Lingxuan Zhu
Weiming Mou
Anqi Lin
Dongqiang Zeng
Chang Qi
Zaoqu Liu
Aimin Jiang
Bufu Tang
Wenjie Shi
Ulf D. Kahlert
Jianguo Zhou
Shipeng Guo
Xiaofan Lu
Xu Sun
Trunghieu Ngo
Zhongji Pu
Baolei Jia
Che Ok Jeon
Yongbin He
Haiyang Wu
Shuqin Gu
Wisit Cheungpasitporn
Haojie Huang
Weipu Mao
Shixiang Wang
Xin Chen
Loïc Cabannes
Gerald Sng Gui Ren
Iain S. Whitaker
Stephen Ali
Quan Cheng
Kai Miao
Shuofeng Yuan
Peng Luo
collection Wiley Open Access
contents STAGER checklist: Standardized testing and assessment guidelines for evaluating generative artificial intelligence reliability Jinghong Chen Lingxuan Zhu Weiming Mou Anqi Lin Dongqiang Zeng Chang Qi Zaoqu Liu Aimin Jiang Bufu Tang Wenjie Shi Ulf D. Kahlert Jianguo Zhou Shipeng Guo Xiaofan Lu Xu Sun Trunghieu Ngo Zhongji Pu Baolei Jia Che Ok Jeon Yongbin He Haiyang Wu Shuqin Gu Wisit Cheungpasitporn Haojie Huang Weipu Mao Shixiang Wang Xin Chen Loïc Cabannes Gerald Sng Gui Ren Iain S. Whitaker Stephen Ali Quan Cheng Kai Miao Shuofeng Yuan Peng Luo iMetaOmics AbstractGenerative artificial intelligence (AI) holds immense potential for medical applications, but the lack of a comprehensive evaluation framework and methodological deficiencies in existing studies hinder its effective implementation. Standardized assessment guidelines are crucial for ensuring reliable and consistent evaluation of generative AI in healthcare. Our objective is to develop robust, standardized guidelines tailored for evaluating generative AI performance in medical contexts. Through a rigorous literature review utilizing the Web of Sciences, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Google Scholar, we focused on research testing generative AI capabilities in medicine. Our multidisciplinary team of experts conducted discussion sessions to develop a comprehensive 32‐item checklist. This checklist encompasses critical evaluation aspects of generative AI in medical applications, addressing key dimensions such as question collection, querying methodologies, and assessment techniques. The checklist and its broader assessment framework provide a holistic evaluation of AI systems, delineating a clear pathway from question gathering to result assessment. It guides researchers through potential challenges and pitfalls, enhancing research quality and reporting and aiding the evolution of generative AI in medicine and life sciences. Our framework furnishes a standardized, systematic approach for testing generative AI's applicability in medicine. For a concise checklist, please refer to Table S or visit GenAIMed.org. 10.1002/imo2.7 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
doi_str_mv 10.1002/imo2.7
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1002_imo2_7
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
publishDate 2024
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle STAGER checklist: Standardized testing and assessment guidelines for evaluating generative artificial intelligence reliability
Jinghong Chen
Lingxuan Zhu
Weiming Mou
Anqi Lin
Dongqiang Zeng
Chang Qi
Zaoqu Liu
Aimin Jiang
Bufu Tang
Wenjie Shi
Ulf D. Kahlert
Jianguo Zhou
Shipeng Guo
Xiaofan Lu
Xu Sun
Trunghieu Ngo
Zhongji Pu
Baolei Jia
Che Ok Jeon
Yongbin He
Haiyang Wu
Shuqin Gu
Wisit Cheungpasitporn
Haojie Huang
Weipu Mao
Shixiang Wang
Xin Chen
Loïc Cabannes
Gerald Sng Gui Ren
Iain S. Whitaker
Stephen Ali
Quan Cheng
Kai Miao
Shuofeng Yuan
Peng Luo
iMetaOmics
STAGER checklist: Standardized testing and assessment guidelines for evaluating generative artificial intelligence reliability Jinghong Chen Lingxuan Zhu Weiming Mou Anqi Lin Dongqiang Zeng Chang Qi Zaoqu Liu Aimin Jiang Bufu Tang Wenjie Shi Ulf D. Kahlert Jianguo Zhou Shipeng Guo Xiaofan Lu Xu Sun Trunghieu Ngo Zhongji Pu Baolei Jia Che Ok Jeon Yongbin He Haiyang Wu Shuqin Gu Wisit Cheungpasitporn Haojie Huang Weipu Mao Shixiang Wang Xin Chen Loïc Cabannes Gerald Sng Gui Ren Iain S. Whitaker Stephen Ali Quan Cheng Kai Miao Shuofeng Yuan Peng Luo iMetaOmics AbstractGenerative artificial intelligence (AI) holds immense potential for medical applications, but the lack of a comprehensive evaluation framework and methodological deficiencies in existing studies hinder its effective implementation. Standardized assessment guidelines are crucial for ensuring reliable and consistent evaluation of generative AI in healthcare. Our objective is to develop robust, standardized guidelines tailored for evaluating generative AI performance in medical contexts. Through a rigorous literature review utilizing the Web of Sciences, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Google Scholar, we focused on research testing generative AI capabilities in medicine. Our multidisciplinary team of experts conducted discussion sessions to develop a comprehensive 32‐item checklist. This checklist encompasses critical evaluation aspects of generative AI in medical applications, addressing key dimensions such as question collection, querying methodologies, and assessment techniques. The checklist and its broader assessment framework provide a holistic evaluation of AI systems, delineating a clear pathway from question gathering to result assessment. It guides researchers through potential challenges and pitfalls, enhancing research quality and reporting and aiding the evolution of generative AI in medicine and life sciences. Our framework furnishes a standardized, systematic approach for testing generative AI's applicability in medicine. For a concise checklist, please refer to Table S or visit GenAIMed.org. 10.1002/imo2.7 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
title STAGER checklist: Standardized testing and assessment guidelines for evaluating generative artificial intelligence reliability
topic iMetaOmics
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/imo2.7