Safety and Efficacy of DPMAS in Patients With Acute‐on‐Chronic Liver Failure Based on Different Platelet Count Levels

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lingyun Niu, Jiamei Zhou, Ninghui Zhao, Aiqing Zhang, Qing Ye, Jia Lian, Baiguo Xu, Jing Wen, Jia Yao, Tao Han
Format: Artículo Open Access
Published: Wiley 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867005346450505728
author Lingyun Niu
Jiamei Zhou
Ninghui Zhao
Aiqing Zhang
Qing Ye
Jia Lian
Baiguo Xu
Jing Wen
Jia Yao
Tao Han
author_facet Lingyun Niu
Jiamei Zhou
Ninghui Zhao
Aiqing Zhang
Qing Ye
Jia Lian
Baiguo Xu
Jing Wen
Jia Yao
Tao Han
Lingyun Niu
Jiamei Zhou
Ninghui Zhao
Aiqing Zhang
Qing Ye
Jia Lian
Baiguo Xu
Jing Wen
Jia Yao
Tao Han
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Safety and Efficacy of DPMAS in Patients With Acute‐on‐Chronic Liver Failure Based on Different Platelet Count Levels Lingyun Niu Jiamei Zhou Ninghui Zhao Aiqing Zhang Qing Ye Jia Lian Baiguo Xu Jing Wen Jia Yao Tao Han Journal of Clinical Apheresis ABSTRACTTo investigate the effect of different platelet (PLT) counts on the safety and efficacy of the double‐plasma molecular absorption system (DPMAS) in patients with acute‐on‐chronic liver failure (ACLF). A total of 156 patients with ACLF receiving DPMAS were divided into the observed group (40 × 109/L ≤ PLT < 50 × 109/L) and the control group (PLT ≥ 50 × 109/L) according to PLT count level. The safety and efficacy indices of bleeding‐related complications, PLT reduction rate, total bilirubin (TBIL) reduction rate, and 28‐days survival rate after DPMAS were analyzed and compared between the two groups. The incidence of bleeding complications during and after DPMAS in the observed and control groups (14.3% vs. 14.9%, p = 0.922), the decline rate of PLT immediately and 24 h after treatment (0.13 vs. 0.11/0.05 vs. 0.09, p = 0.256/0.161), and the 28‐days survival rate after treatment (76.2% vs. 75.4%, p = 0.923) were not significantly different. The thromboelastogram before DPMAS showed no significant difference in PLT function between the two groups (p > 0.05). Although the TBIL level of the two groups rebounded 24 h after treatment compared with immediately after treatment, it decreased significantly immediately and 24 h after treatment compared with pre‐treatment levels (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the rate of decline of serum TBIL immediately after treatment and 24 h after treatment between the two groups (0.33 vs. 0.35/0.14 vs. 0.16, p = 0.193 and 0.653, respectively). DPMAS is safe and effective in patients with ACLF with 40 × 109/L ≤ PLT count < 50 × 109/L. 10.1002/jca.70006 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jca.70006
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1002_jca_70006
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
publishDate 2025
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Safety and Efficacy of DPMAS in Patients With Acute‐on‐Chronic Liver Failure Based on Different Platelet Count Levels
Lingyun Niu
Jiamei Zhou
Ninghui Zhao
Aiqing Zhang
Qing Ye
Jia Lian
Baiguo Xu
Jing Wen
Jia Yao
Tao Han
Journal of Clinical Apheresis
Safety and Efficacy of DPMAS in Patients With Acute‐on‐Chronic Liver Failure Based on Different Platelet Count Levels Lingyun Niu Jiamei Zhou Ninghui Zhao Aiqing Zhang Qing Ye Jia Lian Baiguo Xu Jing Wen Jia Yao Tao Han Journal of Clinical Apheresis ABSTRACTTo investigate the effect of different platelet (PLT) counts on the safety and efficacy of the double‐plasma molecular absorption system (DPMAS) in patients with acute‐on‐chronic liver failure (ACLF). A total of 156 patients with ACLF receiving DPMAS were divided into the observed group (40 × 109/L ≤ PLT < 50 × 109/L) and the control group (PLT ≥ 50 × 109/L) according to PLT count level. The safety and efficacy indices of bleeding‐related complications, PLT reduction rate, total bilirubin (TBIL) reduction rate, and 28‐days survival rate after DPMAS were analyzed and compared between the two groups. The incidence of bleeding complications during and after DPMAS in the observed and control groups (14.3% vs. 14.9%, p = 0.922), the decline rate of PLT immediately and 24 h after treatment (0.13 vs. 0.11/0.05 vs. 0.09, p = 0.256/0.161), and the 28‐days survival rate after treatment (76.2% vs. 75.4%, p = 0.923) were not significantly different. The thromboelastogram before DPMAS showed no significant difference in PLT function between the two groups (p > 0.05). Although the TBIL level of the two groups rebounded 24 h after treatment compared with immediately after treatment, it decreased significantly immediately and 24 h after treatment compared with pre‐treatment levels (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the rate of decline of serum TBIL immediately after treatment and 24 h after treatment between the two groups (0.33 vs. 0.35/0.14 vs. 0.16, p = 0.193 and 0.653, respectively). DPMAS is safe and effective in patients with ACLF with 40 × 109/L ≤ PLT count < 50 × 109/L. 10.1002/jca.70006 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
title Safety and Efficacy of DPMAS in Patients With Acute‐on‐Chronic Liver Failure Based on Different Platelet Count Levels
topic Journal of Clinical Apheresis
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jca.70006