Reversal of Opioid‐Induced Respiratory Depression in Healthy Volunteers: Comparison of Intranasal Nalmefene and Intranasal Naloxone

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mark Ellison, Emily Hutton, Lynn Webster, Phil Skolnick
Formato: Artículo Open Access
Publicado: Wiley 2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1867015394369208320
author Mark Ellison
Emily Hutton
Lynn Webster
Phil Skolnick
author_facet Mark Ellison
Emily Hutton
Lynn Webster
Phil Skolnick
Mark Ellison
Emily Hutton
Lynn Webster
Phil Skolnick
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Reversal of Opioid‐Induced Respiratory Depression in Healthy Volunteers: Comparison of Intranasal Nalmefene and Intranasal Naloxone Mark Ellison Emily Hutton Lynn Webster Phil Skolnick The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology AbstractAn open‐label, randomized, crossover study in healthy volunteers compared the reversal of remifentanil‐induced respiratory depression by intranasal (IN) naloxone hydrochloride (4 mg) to IN nalmefene (2.7 mg) (NCT 04828005). Subjects were administered a hypercapnic gas mixture which produces an elevation in minute ventilation (MV), a result of the ventilatory response to hypercapnia. Subjects breathed a hypercapnic gas mixture through a tight‐fitting mask for an initial period of 46 min prior to a series of mask “holidays” introduced to reduce subject discomfort and encourage study completion. Ten minutes after initiating the hypercapnic gas mixture, a remifentanil bolus was administered, and an infusion continued for the study duration. Subjects were administered either naloxone or nalmefene 15 min after initiating the remifentanil infusion and MV monitored for 21 min followed by a mask holiday. Both nalmefene and naloxone produced a time‐dependent reversal of remifentanil‐induced reductions in MV measured 2.5–20 min post administration. At the primary endpoint (5 min post administration), nalmefene increases in MV (5.75 L/min) were nearly twice that produced by naloxone (3.01 L/min) (P < .0009); the point estimate favors nalmefene, demonstrating non‐inferiority and superiority. In this model of opioid‐induced respiratory depression, nalmefene has a more rapid onset of action than naloxone, which required 20 min to achieve a comparable reversal of respiratory depression. Both nalmefene and naloxone were well tolerated by healthy volunteers. This rapid onset of action may prove particularly valuable in an era when over 90% of fatalities are linked to synthetic opioid overdose. 10.1002/jcph.2421 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jcph.2421
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1002_jcph_2421
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
publishDate 2024
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Reversal of Opioid‐Induced Respiratory Depression in Healthy Volunteers: Comparison of Intranasal Nalmefene and Intranasal Naloxone
Mark Ellison
Emily Hutton
Lynn Webster
Phil Skolnick
The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Reversal of Opioid‐Induced Respiratory Depression in Healthy Volunteers: Comparison of Intranasal Nalmefene and Intranasal Naloxone Mark Ellison Emily Hutton Lynn Webster Phil Skolnick The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology AbstractAn open‐label, randomized, crossover study in healthy volunteers compared the reversal of remifentanil‐induced respiratory depression by intranasal (IN) naloxone hydrochloride (4 mg) to IN nalmefene (2.7 mg) (NCT 04828005). Subjects were administered a hypercapnic gas mixture which produces an elevation in minute ventilation (MV), a result of the ventilatory response to hypercapnia. Subjects breathed a hypercapnic gas mixture through a tight‐fitting mask for an initial period of 46 min prior to a series of mask “holidays” introduced to reduce subject discomfort and encourage study completion. Ten minutes after initiating the hypercapnic gas mixture, a remifentanil bolus was administered, and an infusion continued for the study duration. Subjects were administered either naloxone or nalmefene 15 min after initiating the remifentanil infusion and MV monitored for 21 min followed by a mask holiday. Both nalmefene and naloxone produced a time‐dependent reversal of remifentanil‐induced reductions in MV measured 2.5–20 min post administration. At the primary endpoint (5 min post administration), nalmefene increases in MV (5.75 L/min) were nearly twice that produced by naloxone (3.01 L/min) (P < .0009); the point estimate favors nalmefene, demonstrating non‐inferiority and superiority. In this model of opioid‐induced respiratory depression, nalmefene has a more rapid onset of action than naloxone, which required 20 min to achieve a comparable reversal of respiratory depression. Both nalmefene and naloxone were well tolerated by healthy volunteers. This rapid onset of action may prove particularly valuable in an era when over 90% of fatalities are linked to synthetic opioid overdose. 10.1002/jcph.2421 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
title Reversal of Opioid‐Induced Respiratory Depression in Healthy Volunteers: Comparison of Intranasal Nalmefene and Intranasal Naloxone
topic The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
url https://accp1.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcph.2421