Comparative Diagnostic Performance of IOTA Simple Rules, O‐ RADS US , and Subjective Assessment in Differentiating Benign from Malignant Adnexal Masses

Documenti analoghi

• Diagnostic Accuracy of O‐ RADS US , IOTA Simple Rules, Subjective Assessment, and the Sequential IOTA Simple Rules–Subjective Assessment ( SR – SA ) Strategy in Adnexal Masses: High Sensitivity Versus the Challenge of Specificity in a Middle‐Resource Setting
  di: Carolina Meloni Stecca, et al.
  Pubblicazione: (2025)
• Diagnostic Value of Contrast‐Enhanced Ultrasound in Benign and Malignant Adnexal Masses
  di: Boyang Zhang, et al.
  Pubblicazione: (2024)
• Diagnostic accuracy of Ovarian‐Adnexal Reporting and Data System, IOTA Simple Rules and Pediatric Risk of Malignancy Index for pediatric adnexal lesions: comparative study
  di: M. Wu, et al.
  Pubblicazione: (2025)
• Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasound for Differentiating Malignant From Benign Cervical Lymphadenopathy in Children
  di: Jayoung Moon, et al.
  Pubblicazione: (2025)
• Diagnostic Value of Dual‐Energy CT Iodine Mapping in Differentiating Malignant and Benign Cervical Lymphadenopathies
  di: Mustafa Başaran, et al.
  Pubblicazione: (2025)