Unicondylar knee arthroplasty demonstrating a significant increased risk for aseptic revisions compared to unconstrained and constrained total knee arthroplasty: An analysis of aseptic revisions after unicondylar and primary total knee arthroplasty of the German Arthroplasty Registry

Similar Items

• Low implantation volume, comorbidities, male sex and implantation of constrained TKA identified as risk factors for septic revision in knee arthroplasty: A register‐based study from the German Arthroplasty Registry
  by: Dominik Szymski, et al.
  Published: (2024)
• Periprosthetic joint infection risk is comparable between unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty conversion and primary total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
  by: Maximilian Budin, et al.
  Published: (2025)
• Prospective, randomised controlled trial comparing robotic arm‐assisted bi‐unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty
  by: Omer M. Farhan‐Alanie, et al.
  Published: (2025)
• The number of prior knee arthroscopies is associated with an incremental increase in risk of revision in a subsequent total knee arthroplasty
  by: Julius Tetens Hald, et al.
  Published: (2025)
• Superior patient‐reported clinical outcomes after patient‐individual total knee arthroplasty compared with off‐the‐shelf robotic‐assisted total knee arthroplasty in valgus knee phenotypes
  by: Lars‐Rene Tuecking, et al.
  Published: (2026)