Sample size and follow‐up duration predict the robustness of findings in randomized controlled trials comparing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with or without lateral extra‐articular procedures: A fragility index meta‐analysis

Documents similaires

• Comparative outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with and without lateral extra‐articular tenodesis: A meta‐analysis
  par: Yi Zhang, et autres
  Publié: (2025)
• Faster return to work and reduced failure rates with the addition of a lateral extra‐articular procedure in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction among workers' compensation patients
  par: Rodrigo Olivieri, et autres
  Publié: (2026)
• Similar graft failure rates in low‐activity patients (Tegner activity scale ≤ 4) undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with or without lateral extra‐articular augmentation
  par: Ali Alayane, et autres
  Publié: (2025)
• Selective approach to lateral extra‐articular tenodesis achieves low anterior cruciate ligament graft rupture rates, while posterior tibial slope and static anterior tibial translation remain major risk factors
  par: David Mazy, et autres
  Publié: (2026)
• The elusive predictors of anterior cruciate ligament failure in the young: Null findings in registry data
  par: DuJiang Yang, et autres
  Publié: (2026)