Cover Image

Letter to the Editor regarding ‘Increased contralateral dynamic valgus in female athletes following ACL reconstruction’

Fuente: Wiley Open Access

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Mingfeng Lu, Xingxing Li, Fuyou Zhang, Lilei He, Mingyun Fu, Huolong Zhou
Format:	Artículo Open Access
Published:	Wiley 2026
Subjects:	Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
Online Access:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items

Response Letter to the Editor regarding ‘Increased contralateral dynamic valgus in female athletes following ACL reconstruction’
by: Fredrik Gaugg, et al.
Published: (2026)

Global knee function rating more strongly influences adolescent athletes that sustain a sports‐related surgical ACL re‐injury or contralateral ACL injury
by: John Nyland, et al.
Published: (2024)

Increased residual anterior knee laxity at one year is associated with a dose‐dependent increase in graft re‐rupture risk following hamstring autograft ACL reconstruction in athletes
by: Tunay Erden, et al.
Published: (2026)

Response to the Letter to the Editor regarding the meta‐analytic evidence on age‐stratified ACL repair outcomes, with a commentary on reporting beyond the evidence hierarchy
by: Sebastian Conner‐Rilk, et al.
Published: (2025)

Kinematic association between single‐leg squat and hop landing in female athletes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
by: Wataru Fukuda, et al.
Published: (2025)

Validating the capture rate of revisions by the New Zealand ACL Registry: An analysis of all‐cause reoperation following primary ACL reconstruction
by: Richard Rahardja, et al.
Published: (2024)

Tibiofemoral bone configuration is not associated with hamstring muscle strength in male and female patients with ACL reconstruction
by: Christoph Centner, et al.
Published: (2024)

The majority of elite and professional athletes return to the preinjury level of activity after ACL reconstruction: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
by: Riccardo D'Ambrosi, et al.
Published: (2025)

More knee reinjuries after ACL reconstruction compared to nonsurgical treatment of the ACL. A 2‐year follow‐up of the NACOX prospective cohort study
by: Anna S. Selin, et al.
Published: (2024)

Revision ACL reconstruction, but not bilateral ACL reconstruction, is associated with clinically relevant inferior subjective knee function compared with primary ACL reconstruction: A comparative analysis of 6831 patients
by: Riccardo Cristiani, et al.
Published: (2024)

Increased risk for early revision with quadriceps graft compared with patellar tendon graft in primary ACL reconstructions
by: Marek Zegzdryn, et al.
Published: (2024)

Satisfactory 5‐year functional outcomes following primary ACL reconstructions from the UK National Ligament Registry
by: Ayman Gabr, et al.
Published: (2024)

Valgus malalignment causes increased forces on a medial collateral ligament reconstruction under dynamic valgus loading: A biomechanical study
by: Christian Peez, et al.
Published: (2024)

ACL injury prevention content on TikTok : Untapped outreach potential for youth athletes
by: Ameer A. Haider, et al.
Published: (2025)

Lack of association between revision ACL reconstruction and preoperative, intraoperative and post‐operative factors at primary ACL reconstruction in children and adolescents
by: Riccardo Cristiani, et al.
Published: (2024)

Similar dynamic tibiofemoral movements during jump‐landing and walking but distinct hamstrings strength across ACL reconstruction autograft types at mid‐term follow‐up
by: Tom Vendrig, et al.
Published: (2026)

Rectus femoris tendon: An emerging option in ACL reconstruction
by: Tomas Pineda, et al.
Published: (2025)

Patient‐reported outcome measures following individualised TKA are not affected by the degree of preoperative coronal varus or valgus laxity
by: Elliot Sappey‐Marinier, et al.
Published: (2024)

The critical 3‐ to 6‐month period of quadriceps tendon graft remodelling following ACL reconstruction: Implications for safe return to sport
by: Magdalena Stawińska, et al.
Published: (2026)

Older age, higher BMI, female sex and meniscal repair are predictors of inferior patient‐reported outcomes 1 year after ACL reconstruction
by: Junya Tsukisaka, et al.
Published: (2025)

Prevention of ACL injury is better than repair or reconstruction—Implementing the ESSKA‐ESMA ‘Prevention for All’ ACL programme
by: Robert Prill, et al.
Published: (2025)

ACL injuries in elite alpine skiing reliably allow athletes to return to competition and perform at or above their pre‐injury level
by: Jakub Oronowicz, et al.
Published: (2025)

Femoral tunnel length does not impact outcomes following ACL reconstruction using a single‐bundle quadriceps tendon autograft: A systematic review
by: Tess Bracken, et al.
Published: (2024)

ACL Denmark: A nationwide register‐questionnaire study from 2000 to 2018 reporting stable ACL incidence rates but rising rates of reconstruction
by: Niels Christian Kaldau, et al.
Published: (2026)

Vertical jump asymmetries from 6 to 9 months following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft in non‐elite athletes
by: Peter Edwards, et al.
Published: (2025)

Late (≥60 years old) and middle adulthood (40–59 years old) patients achieve similar improvement in patient‐reported outcomes following ACL reconstruction
by: Nicholas B. Pohl, et al.
Published: (2024)

Early surgery, meniscal injury and physiologic contralateral knee extension deficit are associated with extension loss prior to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
by: Riccardo Cristiani, et al.
Published: (2025)

Letter to the Editor regarding ‘Anterior cruciate ligament primary repair revision rates are increased in skeletally mature patients under the age of 21 compared to reconstruction, while adults (>21 years) show no significant difference: A systematic review and meta‐analysis’
by: Hanrong Rao, et al.
Published: (2025)

Graft selection in ACL reconstruction: Clinical and functional outcomes based on level I–II evidence
by: Mahmod Hasan, et al.
Published: (2025)

Good physical function but reduced quality of life in children 3 years after ACL reconstruction
by: Mathilde Lundgaard‐Nielsen, et al.
Published: (2024)

Preoperative CPAK phenotype does not affect clinical and radiological outcomes after medial closing‐wedge distal femoral osteotomy in valgus knees at 8‐year follow‐up
by: Alessio Maione, et al.
Published: (2025)

Lateral extra‐articular tenodesis at primary ACL reconstruction increases career length in professional rugby players
by: Kyle Borque, et al.
Published: (2024)

Beyond the registry: The multifactorial enigma of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the young athlete
by: DuJiang Yang, et al.
Published: (2026)

Greater hip internal rotation range of motion is associated with increased dynamic knee valgus during jump landing, both before and after fatigue
by: Sandro Hodel, et al.
Published: (2024)

Poor side‐to‐side symmetry in posterior tibial slope limits the use of the contralateral limb as a reliable reference for surgical planning in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
by: Romir Patel, et al.
Published: (2026)

An isolated lateral extra‐articular procedure for persisting rotatory instability following ACL reconstruction has low failure rates with good clinical and patient‐reported outcomes: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
by: Anirudh Sharma, et al.
Published: (2026)

Elite athletes return to sport faster and more often than non‐elite athletes with low complication rates following proximal hamstring repair: A systematic review
by: Udit Dave, et al.
Published: (2025)

Kaplan fibres of the knee revisited: Anatomical variants, MRI identification and surgical implications for ACL reconstruction and rotational instability
by: Ingrid C. Landfald, et al.
Published: (2025)

Weight‐bearing after ACL reconstruction with or without concomitant injuries: Defining the limits of early mobilisation and safe rehabilitation
by: Marko Ostojic, et al.
Published: (2025)

Single‐ or two‐stage revision after failed ACL reconstruction: No differences in re‐revision rates and clinical outcomes
by: Torsten Grønbech Nielsen, et al.
Published: (2024)