Buchumschlag

Assessing the Societal Impact of Academic Research With Artificial Intelligence ( AI ): A Scoping Review of Business School Scholarship as a ‘Force for Good’

Fuente: Wiley Open Access

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser:	David Steingard, Kathleen Rodenburg
Format:	Artículo Open Access
Veröffentlicht:	Wiley 2025
Schlagworte:	Learned Publishing
Online-Zugang:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Ähnliche Einträge

AI In Academic Publishing for Non‐Native English Speakers: The Good, the Bot, and the Ugly
von: Talip Gönülal, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

From Connections to Citations: Assessing the Influence of Academic Social Networking ( ASN ) Sites on Scholarly Impact in Bangladesh
von: Sabrina Aktar, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Integrity and Misconduct, Where Does Artificial Intelligence Lead?
von: David Nicholas, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Scoping Reviews Should Describe—Not Score
von: Tove Godskesen
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

Beyond the Map: Considering Reporting Quality to Strengthen Scoping Reviews
von: Chin‐Siang Ang, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Science Behind a Paywall: Restricted Access Limits the Promise of Artificial Intelligence
von: Haoyi Zheng, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

Why Not Use the Power of Artificial Intelligence to Encourage the Reading of Scientific Articles?
von: Mert Şen, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

Barriers to Accessibility: Reflections on Submitting Academic Work as a Blind Researcher
von: Ibrahim Helmy Emara
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

Gatekeepers or Nightmares? Exploring Academics' Experiences With the Reviewer 2 Phenomenon
von: Mustafa Caner, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

Do Early Career Researchers Consider AI as an Opportunity or a Threat? A Pathfinding Study
von: David Nicholas, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

Where Will AI Take Scholarly Communication? Voices From the Research Frontline
von: David Nicholas, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Review Articles, Generative AI and the Remaking of Scholarly Infrastructure
von: Serhii Nazarovets, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

Sharpening the Pencil, Not Replacing the Hand: De‐Stigmatising AI Use in Research Writing
von: Aaron Opdyke
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

“I Really Try to Model Good Practices”: Reflecting on Journal Article Publication From Mid‐Career
von: Margaret K. Merga, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

The impact of generative AI on the scholarly communications of early career researchers: An international, multi‐disciplinary study
von: David Nicholas, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2024)

Peer Review at the Crossroads
von: Dmitry Kochetkov
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

The impact of AI on the post‐pandemic generation of early career researchers: What we know or can predict from the published literature
von: Eti Herman, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2024)

What Are Journals and Reviewers Concerned About in Data Papers? Evidence From Journal Guidelines and Review Reports
von: Xinyu Wang, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Enhancing Consistency in Peer Review: A Statistical Analysis of Discrepancies and Proposals for Improvement
von: Maher M. Alarfaj
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Publish‐Review‐Curate Modelling for Data Paper and Dataset: A Collaborative Approach
von: Youngim Jung, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Clinical Evidence Behind a Paywall: An Analysis of Randomised Clinical Trials Included in Cochrane Reviews
von: Leonardo J. Uribe‐Cavero, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

AI and language change: The case of the hallucinating spellchecker
von: Keith Abbott
Veröffentlicht: (2024)

Who Owns the Argument? A Practical Test for Author Responsibility in AI ‐Assisted Scholarly Writing
von: Malcolm Koo, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

Expanding the Paediatric Urology Peer Review Pipeline: A Novel Panel and Facilitated Peer Mentorship Program
von: Michael Ernst, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Small Is Sexy: Rethinking Article Length in the Age of AI
von: Yana Suchikova, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Collaborating With Early Career Researchers to Enhance the Future of Scholarly Publication: A Guide for Publishers
von: Friederike E. Kohrs, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Conclusion First: A Modest Proposal to Reorganize the IMRaD Structure of Research Articles
von: Farrokh Habibzadeh
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

Rethinking Peer Review Using the Swiss Cheese Model to Better Flag Problematic Manuscripts
von: Jennifer A. Byrne, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Scholarly Publications: Criteria, Types, and Recognition From the Researchers' Perspective
von: Christian Kaier, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Recycling Research Without (Self‐)Plagiarism: The Importance of Context and the Case of Conference Contributions
von: Gert Helgesson, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2024)

Securing the Future of Books: A Collaborative Guide to Preservation
von: Graham Bell, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

WhatsApp — what’s that?
von: David Clark, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2024)

Are early career researchers feeling the consequences of the COVID pandemic?
von: David Nicholas, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2024)

Invitations to Publish in a Journal by Email: A Prospective Analysis
von: Christiane Thallinger, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

Purchase and publish: Early career researchers and open access publishing costs
von: David Nicholas, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2024)

From Gatekeeping to Brokerage: A Collaborative Ethnography of Editorial Work in International English as a Foreign Language Journals
von: Thanh Thao Le, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

Is the Scholarly System Breaking Down?
von: David Nicholas, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

From Findings to Meaning: A Strategic Framework for the Discussion Section
von: Farrokh Habibzadeh
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

The Existence of Stealth Corrections in Scientific Literature—A Threat to Scientific Integrity
von: René Aquarius, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Macao's academic book publishing industry: A SWOT and PEST analysis
von: Li Jiagui, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2024)