Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abolghasem Akbari, Majid Rajabi Jaghargh, Azizan Abu Samah, Jonathan Peter Cox, Mojtaba Gholamzadeh, Alireza Araghi, Patricia M. Saco, Khabat Khosravi
Format: Artículo Open Access
Published: Wiley 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/met.2221
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867007400245985281
author Abolghasem Akbari
Majid Rajabi Jaghargh
Azizan Abu Samah
Jonathan Peter Cox
Mojtaba Gholamzadeh
Alireza Araghi
Patricia M. Saco
Khabat Khosravi
author_facet Abolghasem Akbari
Majid Rajabi Jaghargh
Azizan Abu Samah
Jonathan Peter Cox
Mojtaba Gholamzadeh
Alireza Araghi
Patricia M. Saco
Khabat Khosravi
Abolghasem Akbari
Majid Rajabi Jaghargh
Azizan Abu Samah
Jonathan Peter Cox
Mojtaba Gholamzadeh
Alireza Araghi
Patricia M. Saco
Khabat Khosravi
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Utilization of the Google Earth Engine for the evaluation of daily soil temperature derived from Global Land Data Assimilation System in two different depths over a semiarid region Abolghasem Akbari Majid Rajabi Jaghargh Azizan Abu Samah Jonathan Peter Cox Mojtaba Gholamzadeh Alireza Araghi Patricia M. Saco Khabat Khosravi Meteorological Applications AbstractThe Google Earth Engine (GEE) was used to investigate the performance of the Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS) soil temperature (ST) data against observed ST from 13 synoptic stations over a semiarid region in Iran. Three‐hourly ST data were collected and analyzed in two depths (0–10 cm; 40–100 cm) and 5 years. In each depth, GLDAS‐Noah ST data were evaluated for daily minimum, maximum, and average ST (i.e., Tmin, Tmax, and Tavg). Based on the correlation coefficient, Kling–Gupta Efficiency, and Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency the overall performance of the GLDAS‐Noah is 0.96, 0.66, and 0.79 for Tmin; 0.97, 0.84, and 0.89 for Tavg; and 0.95, 0.89, and 0.89 for Tmax, respectively in the first layer. Likewise, 0.97, 0.85, and 0.86 for Tmin; 0.97, 0.77, and 0.80 for Tavg; and 0.97, 0.69, and 0.69 for Tmax are obtained in the second layer. However, there is a significant negative bias which tends to underestimate ST in the two investigated layers, given by an average bias over all the stations analyzed of −24%, −12%, and −5% for Tmin, Tavg, and Tmax in the first layer, and average bias of −8%, −13%, and −17% for Tmin, Tavg, and Tmax in the second layer. This study reveals that GLDAS‐Noah‐derived ST can be used in arid regions where little or no observation data is available. Moreover, GEE performed as an advanced geospatial processing tool in regional scale analysis of ST in different layers. 10.1002/met.2221 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
doi_str_mv 10.1002/met.2221
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1002_met_2221
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
publishDate 2024
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Utilization of the Google Earth Engine for the evaluation of daily soil temperature derived from Global Land Data Assimilation System in two different depths over a semiarid region
Abolghasem Akbari
Majid Rajabi Jaghargh
Azizan Abu Samah
Jonathan Peter Cox
Mojtaba Gholamzadeh
Alireza Araghi
Patricia M. Saco
Khabat Khosravi
Meteorological Applications
Utilization of the Google Earth Engine for the evaluation of daily soil temperature derived from Global Land Data Assimilation System in two different depths over a semiarid region Abolghasem Akbari Majid Rajabi Jaghargh Azizan Abu Samah Jonathan Peter Cox Mojtaba Gholamzadeh Alireza Araghi Patricia M. Saco Khabat Khosravi Meteorological Applications AbstractThe Google Earth Engine (GEE) was used to investigate the performance of the Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS) soil temperature (ST) data against observed ST from 13 synoptic stations over a semiarid region in Iran. Three‐hourly ST data were collected and analyzed in two depths (0–10 cm; 40–100 cm) and 5 years. In each depth, GLDAS‐Noah ST data were evaluated for daily minimum, maximum, and average ST (i.e., Tmin, Tmax, and Tavg). Based on the correlation coefficient, Kling–Gupta Efficiency, and Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency the overall performance of the GLDAS‐Noah is 0.96, 0.66, and 0.79 for Tmin; 0.97, 0.84, and 0.89 for Tavg; and 0.95, 0.89, and 0.89 for Tmax, respectively in the first layer. Likewise, 0.97, 0.85, and 0.86 for Tmin; 0.97, 0.77, and 0.80 for Tavg; and 0.97, 0.69, and 0.69 for Tmax are obtained in the second layer. However, there is a significant negative bias which tends to underestimate ST in the two investigated layers, given by an average bias over all the stations analyzed of −24%, −12%, and −5% for Tmin, Tavg, and Tmax in the first layer, and average bias of −8%, −13%, and −17% for Tmin, Tavg, and Tmax in the second layer. This study reveals that GLDAS‐Noah‐derived ST can be used in arid regions where little or no observation data is available. Moreover, GEE performed as an advanced geospatial processing tool in regional scale analysis of ST in different layers. 10.1002/met.2221 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
title Utilization of the Google Earth Engine for the evaluation of daily soil temperature derived from Global Land Data Assimilation System in two different depths over a semiarid region
topic Meteorological Applications
url https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/met.2221