On the origin of MTF reduction in grating‐based x‐ray differential phase contrast CT imaging

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Yuhang Tan, Jiecheng Yang, Hairong Zheng, Dong Liang, Peiping Zhu, Yongshuai Ge
Natura: Artículo Open Access
Pubblicazione: Wiley 2024
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1867016987509522432
author Yuhang Tan
Jiecheng Yang
Hairong Zheng
Dong Liang
Peiping Zhu
Yongshuai Ge
author_facet Yuhang Tan
Jiecheng Yang
Hairong Zheng
Dong Liang
Peiping Zhu
Yongshuai Ge
Yuhang Tan
Jiecheng Yang
Hairong Zheng
Dong Liang
Peiping Zhu
Yongshuai Ge
collection Wiley Open Access
contents On the origin of MTF reduction in grating‐based x‐ray differential phase contrast CT imaging Yuhang Tan Jiecheng Yang Hairong Zheng Dong Liang Peiping Zhu Yongshuai Ge Medical Physics Abstract Background The complementary absorption contrast CT (ACT) and differential phase contrast CT (DPCT) can be generated simultaneously from an x‐ray computed tomography (CT) imaging system incorporated with grating interferometer. However, it has been reported that ACT images exhibit better spatial resolution than DPCT images. By far, the primary cause of such discrepancy remains unclear. Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate the underlying cause of the resolution discrepancy between ACT and DPCT in a grating interferometer CT imaging system. Methods In this study, theoretical derivations were performed with a ‐phase Talbot–Lau grating interferometer system to model the signal formation mechanism of absorption imaging and phase imaging, respectively. In addition, physical, and numerical experiments were conducted to verify the theoretical findings and assess the resolution discrepancy between ACT and DPCT under various conditions. Herein, the ACT and DPCT images were reconstructed from the filtered‐back‐projection algorithm using a standard Ramp filter and a standard Hilbert filter, respectively. Results Experiments demonstrated that the spatial resolution of ACT and DPCT images are primarily impacted by the beam diffraction induced signal splitting. In particular, lower modulation transfer function (MTF) was observed for DPCT than ACT due to the opposite‐superposition of phase signals. In addition, factors such as focal spot size, beam spectra, object composition, sample size, and detector pixel size were found to have minor impacts on the MTFs of both ACT and DPCT. Conclusions In conclusion, this study reveals that the opposite‐superposition of split phase signals causes the spatial resolution reduction in DPCT imaging. 10.1002/mp.17593 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
doi_str_mv 10.1002/mp.17593
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1002_mp_17593
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
publishDate 2024
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle On the origin of MTF reduction in grating‐based x‐ray differential phase contrast CT imaging
Yuhang Tan
Jiecheng Yang
Hairong Zheng
Dong Liang
Peiping Zhu
Yongshuai Ge
Medical Physics
On the origin of MTF reduction in grating‐based x‐ray differential phase contrast CT imaging Yuhang Tan Jiecheng Yang Hairong Zheng Dong Liang Peiping Zhu Yongshuai Ge Medical Physics Abstract Background The complementary absorption contrast CT (ACT) and differential phase contrast CT (DPCT) can be generated simultaneously from an x‐ray computed tomography (CT) imaging system incorporated with grating interferometer. However, it has been reported that ACT images exhibit better spatial resolution than DPCT images. By far, the primary cause of such discrepancy remains unclear. Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate the underlying cause of the resolution discrepancy between ACT and DPCT in a grating interferometer CT imaging system. Methods In this study, theoretical derivations were performed with a ‐phase Talbot–Lau grating interferometer system to model the signal formation mechanism of absorption imaging and phase imaging, respectively. In addition, physical, and numerical experiments were conducted to verify the theoretical findings and assess the resolution discrepancy between ACT and DPCT under various conditions. Herein, the ACT and DPCT images were reconstructed from the filtered‐back‐projection algorithm using a standard Ramp filter and a standard Hilbert filter, respectively. Results Experiments demonstrated that the spatial resolution of ACT and DPCT images are primarily impacted by the beam diffraction induced signal splitting. In particular, lower modulation transfer function (MTF) was observed for DPCT than ACT due to the opposite‐superposition of phase signals. In addition, factors such as focal spot size, beam spectra, object composition, sample size, and detector pixel size were found to have minor impacts on the MTFs of both ACT and DPCT. Conclusions In conclusion, this study reveals that the opposite‐superposition of split phase signals causes the spatial resolution reduction in DPCT imaging. 10.1002/mp.17593 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
title On the origin of MTF reduction in grating‐based x‐ray differential phase contrast CT imaging
topic Medical Physics
url https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mp.17593