Electron and proton FLASH beam dosimetry using unified alanine, EBT‐XD, and HD‐V2 Gafchromic film dosimeters

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Seongmoon Jung, In Jung Kim, Chul‐Young Yi, Yun Ho Kim, Young Min Seong, Rukundo Solomon, Sang Hyoun Choi, Young‐jae Jang, Se Byeong Lee, Chae‐Eon Kim, Sang‐il Pak, Jong In Park
Format: Artículo Open Access
Published: Wiley 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867017741232242688
author Seongmoon Jung
In Jung Kim
Chul‐Young Yi
Yun Ho Kim
Young Min Seong
Rukundo Solomon
Sang Hyoun Choi
Young‐jae Jang
Se Byeong Lee
Chae‐Eon Kim
Sang‐il Pak
Jong In Park
author_facet Seongmoon Jung
In Jung Kim
Chul‐Young Yi
Yun Ho Kim
Young Min Seong
Rukundo Solomon
Sang Hyoun Choi
Young‐jae Jang
Se Byeong Lee
Chae‐Eon Kim
Sang‐il Pak
Jong In Park
Seongmoon Jung
In Jung Kim
Chul‐Young Yi
Yun Ho Kim
Young Min Seong
Rukundo Solomon
Sang Hyoun Choi
Young‐jae Jang
Se Byeong Lee
Chae‐Eon Kim
Sang‐il Pak
Jong In Park
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Electron and proton FLASH beam dosimetry using unified alanine, EBT‐XD, and HD‐V2 Gafchromic film dosimeters Seongmoon Jung In Jung Kim Chul‐Young Yi Yun Ho Kim Young Min Seong Rukundo Solomon Sang Hyoun Choi Young‐jae Jang Se Byeong Lee Chae‐Eon Kim Sang‐il Pak Jong In Park Medical Physics Abstract Background Ultra‐high dose rate (UHDR) radiotherapy, or FLASH RT, has shown potential to spare normal tissues while maintaining tumor control. However, accurate dosimetry at UHDR remains challenging, as conventional ionization chambers suffer from recombination effects. Although radiochromic films and alanine dosimeters have both been investigated independently for FLASH dosimetry, their separate use hinders robust validation and direct comparison of their measurements. Purpose This study aims to develop and evaluate a unified dosimeter containing both alanine and radiochromic film for electron and proton FLASH beam dosimetry. The design allows for simultaneous, co‐located irradiation of both dosimeter types, enabling a direct comparison between them. This configuration eliminates confounding factors such as positional offsets, alignment errors, and beam fluctuations, thereby facilitating the validation of measurements and enhancing confidence in FLASH dosimetry. Methods The unified alanine and EBT‐XD/HD‐V2 film dosimeter was designed with the same outer dimensions as the Advanced Markus chamber (PTW‐Freiburg), allowing compatibility with commercial QA phantoms. Alanine and film dosimeters were calibrated under conventional electron and proton beams, traceable to absorbed dose to water from Co‐60 gamma rays. The unified dosimeter was used to measure dose from a 9 MeV electron FLASH beam (Varian Clinac iX) and a 230 MeV proton FLASH beam (IBA machine), with alanine and film irradiated simultaneously at the same location. Results The alanine dosimeter measured the dose per pulse, instantaneous dose rate, and mean dose rate at a source‐to‐surface distance of 100 cm for the electron FLASH beam as 0.99 0.02 Gy/pulse, 2.48 10 5  Gy/s, and 357 Gy/s, respectively. The EBT‐XD film showed good agreement (within a 2.0% relative difference) in the 10–30‐Gy range, whereas the HD‐V2 indicated a larger difference (up to 5.9%) compared to the alanine dosimeter. The mean dose rate for the proton FLASH beam, measured by the alanine dosimeter, was 115.4 1.1 Gy/s. The EBT‐XD showed a 4.3% relative difference with the alanine dosimeter in the 10–30‐Gy range. Conclusions The unified alanine and film dosimeters enabled simultaneous irradiation of the alanine and the films, with combined relative standard uncertainties of 2.4% ( k  = 1) for the alanine dosimeter and 3.5% ( k  = 1) for the EBT‐XD films at the electron FLASH beam. For the proton FLASH beam, these uncertainties were 3.2% ( k  = 1) for both the alanine dosimeter and the EBT‐XD films. Until dosimetry guidelines for the FLASH RT community are established by a working group such as AAPM TG‐359, the dosimetry protocol proposed in this study can serve as a promising approach for FLASH RT facilities worldwide. 10.1002/mp.70022 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
doi_str_mv 10.1002/mp.70022
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1002_mp_70022
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
publishDate 2025
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Electron and proton FLASH beam dosimetry using unified alanine, EBT‐XD, and HD‐V2 Gafchromic film dosimeters
Seongmoon Jung
In Jung Kim
Chul‐Young Yi
Yun Ho Kim
Young Min Seong
Rukundo Solomon
Sang Hyoun Choi
Young‐jae Jang
Se Byeong Lee
Chae‐Eon Kim
Sang‐il Pak
Jong In Park
Medical Physics
Electron and proton FLASH beam dosimetry using unified alanine, EBT‐XD, and HD‐V2 Gafchromic film dosimeters Seongmoon Jung In Jung Kim Chul‐Young Yi Yun Ho Kim Young Min Seong Rukundo Solomon Sang Hyoun Choi Young‐jae Jang Se Byeong Lee Chae‐Eon Kim Sang‐il Pak Jong In Park Medical Physics Abstract Background Ultra‐high dose rate (UHDR) radiotherapy, or FLASH RT, has shown potential to spare normal tissues while maintaining tumor control. However, accurate dosimetry at UHDR remains challenging, as conventional ionization chambers suffer from recombination effects. Although radiochromic films and alanine dosimeters have both been investigated independently for FLASH dosimetry, their separate use hinders robust validation and direct comparison of their measurements. Purpose This study aims to develop and evaluate a unified dosimeter containing both alanine and radiochromic film for electron and proton FLASH beam dosimetry. The design allows for simultaneous, co‐located irradiation of both dosimeter types, enabling a direct comparison between them. This configuration eliminates confounding factors such as positional offsets, alignment errors, and beam fluctuations, thereby facilitating the validation of measurements and enhancing confidence in FLASH dosimetry. Methods The unified alanine and EBT‐XD/HD‐V2 film dosimeter was designed with the same outer dimensions as the Advanced Markus chamber (PTW‐Freiburg), allowing compatibility with commercial QA phantoms. Alanine and film dosimeters were calibrated under conventional electron and proton beams, traceable to absorbed dose to water from Co‐60 gamma rays. The unified dosimeter was used to measure dose from a 9 MeV electron FLASH beam (Varian Clinac iX) and a 230 MeV proton FLASH beam (IBA machine), with alanine and film irradiated simultaneously at the same location. Results The alanine dosimeter measured the dose per pulse, instantaneous dose rate, and mean dose rate at a source‐to‐surface distance of 100 cm for the electron FLASH beam as 0.99 0.02 Gy/pulse, 2.48 10 5  Gy/s, and 357 Gy/s, respectively. The EBT‐XD film showed good agreement (within a 2.0% relative difference) in the 10–30‐Gy range, whereas the HD‐V2 indicated a larger difference (up to 5.9%) compared to the alanine dosimeter. The mean dose rate for the proton FLASH beam, measured by the alanine dosimeter, was 115.4 1.1 Gy/s. The EBT‐XD showed a 4.3% relative difference with the alanine dosimeter in the 10–30‐Gy range. Conclusions The unified alanine and film dosimeters enabled simultaneous irradiation of the alanine and the films, with combined relative standard uncertainties of 2.4% ( k  = 1) for the alanine dosimeter and 3.5% ( k  = 1) for the EBT‐XD films at the electron FLASH beam. For the proton FLASH beam, these uncertainties were 3.2% ( k  = 1) for both the alanine dosimeter and the EBT‐XD films. Until dosimetry guidelines for the FLASH RT community are established by a working group such as AAPM TG‐359, the dosimetry protocol proposed in this study can serve as a promising approach for FLASH RT facilities worldwide. 10.1002/mp.70022 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
title Electron and proton FLASH beam dosimetry using unified alanine, EBT‐XD, and HD‐V2 Gafchromic film dosimeters
topic Medical Physics
url https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mp.70022