Harmonisation of assessments of attention, social, emotional, and behaviour problems using the Child Behavior Checklist and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Nicole Baumann, Peter J. Anderson, Samantha Johnson, Neil Marlow, Dieter Wolke, Julia Jaekel
Format: Artículo Open Access
Veröffentlicht: Wiley 2024
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1867006399926501376
author Nicole Baumann
Peter J. Anderson
Samantha Johnson
Neil Marlow
Dieter Wolke
Julia Jaekel
author_facet Nicole Baumann
Peter J. Anderson
Samantha Johnson
Neil Marlow
Dieter Wolke
Julia Jaekel
Nicole Baumann
Peter J. Anderson
Samantha Johnson
Neil Marlow
Dieter Wolke
Julia Jaekel
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Harmonisation of assessments of attention, social, emotional, and behaviour problems using the Child Behavior Checklist and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Nicole Baumann Peter J. Anderson Samantha Johnson Neil Marlow Dieter Wolke Julia Jaekel International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research AbstractObjectivesRetrospective harmonisation of data obtained through different instruments creates measurement error, even if the underlying concepts are assumed the same. We tested a novel method for item‐level data harmonisation of two widely used instruments that measure emotional and behavioural problems: the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ).MethodsItem content of the CBCL and SDQ was mapped onto four dimensions: emotional problems, peer relationship problems, hyperactivity/inattention and conduct problems. A diverse test sample was drawn from four prospective longitudinal birth cohort studies in Australia and Europe who used one or both instruments. The pooled sample included 5188 data points assessing children and adolescents aged 6–13 years (N = 257–704 participants per cohort). Measurement invariance was assessed using latent variable multi‐group confirmatory factor analysis.ResultsFifteen items from the CBCL and SDQ were mapped onto four dimensions allowing for measurement invariance testing as part of a stepwise process. Partial strict invariance between CBCL and SDQ assessments was established for all four dimensions.ConclusionsThe harmonised dimensions of emotional, peer relationship, hyperactivity/inattention and conduct problems are invariant across the CBCL and SDQ suggesting that these dimensions can be reliably compared with limited measurement error. 10.1002/mpr.2001 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
doi_str_mv 10.1002/mpr.2001
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1002_mpr_2001
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
publishDate 2024
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Harmonisation of assessments of attention, social, emotional, and behaviour problems using the Child Behavior Checklist and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
Nicole Baumann
Peter J. Anderson
Samantha Johnson
Neil Marlow
Dieter Wolke
Julia Jaekel
International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
Harmonisation of assessments of attention, social, emotional, and behaviour problems using the Child Behavior Checklist and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Nicole Baumann Peter J. Anderson Samantha Johnson Neil Marlow Dieter Wolke Julia Jaekel International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research AbstractObjectivesRetrospective harmonisation of data obtained through different instruments creates measurement error, even if the underlying concepts are assumed the same. We tested a novel method for item‐level data harmonisation of two widely used instruments that measure emotional and behavioural problems: the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ).MethodsItem content of the CBCL and SDQ was mapped onto four dimensions: emotional problems, peer relationship problems, hyperactivity/inattention and conduct problems. A diverse test sample was drawn from four prospective longitudinal birth cohort studies in Australia and Europe who used one or both instruments. The pooled sample included 5188 data points assessing children and adolescents aged 6–13 years (N = 257–704 participants per cohort). Measurement invariance was assessed using latent variable multi‐group confirmatory factor analysis.ResultsFifteen items from the CBCL and SDQ were mapped onto four dimensions allowing for measurement invariance testing as part of a stepwise process. Partial strict invariance between CBCL and SDQ assessments was established for all four dimensions.ConclusionsThe harmonised dimensions of emotional, peer relationship, hyperactivity/inattention and conduct problems are invariant across the CBCL and SDQ suggesting that these dimensions can be reliably compared with limited measurement error. 10.1002/mpr.2001 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
title Harmonisation of assessments of attention, social, emotional, and behaviour problems using the Child Behavior Checklist and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
topic International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mpr.2001